The Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Evidence from the Effects of Contextual Constraint in a Sentence Completion Task

Although the prefrontal cortices, in particular the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), have been examined in numerous imaging and neuropsychological studies, it has proved difficult to assign a specific function to this brain region. The aim of this study was therefore to delineate the function of the DLPFC first by using positron emission tomography with a word generation task and second by comparing these findings with a series of different circumstances in which the DLPFC is activated in association with response selection. Six healthy volunteers were presented with a sentence completion task based on the Hayling test. In each of two conditions, (A) response initiation and (B) response suppression, volunteers saw a sentence with the final word omitted. In condition A they had to provide a word that fitted at the end of the sentence and in condition B they had to provide a word that did not fit. The corpus of sentences used varied systematically in their level of contextual constraint, ranging from low to high. With all levels of constraint combined, significant greater activation was observed in the left DLPFC (BA46/9) under the suppression condition and in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (BA11) under the initiation condition. Under the high-constraint condition with both tasks combined, significant right middle temporal activity (BA21) was observed, whereas under low constraint, the left DLPFC was significantly activated. An interaction of task and constraint revealed that the left DLPFC was significantly more active in the suppression task at all levels of constraint, but only under the low-constraint conditions in the initiation task. The reaction time analyses mirrored the pattern of activity observed, with slower reaction times under conditions of suppression and under conditions of initiation with low constraint. By comparing these findings with other studies of response selection, we argue that the most likely single cognitive function of the DLPFC is to specify a set of responses suitable for a given task and to bias these for selection (sculpting the response space). This function resembles the biasing of competition between stimuli in the model of Desimone and Duncan and is analogous to the component of the Supervisory Attentional System that modulates the contention scheduling system.

[1]  E. Maguire,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional activation of the human frontal cortex during the performance of verbal working memory tasks. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  The functional anatomy of verbal initiation and suppression using the Hayling Test , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Elliott,et al.  Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from human neuroimaging studies. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  E. Perret The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T. Shallice,et al.  Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[11]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[13]  M D'Esposito,et al.  The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study of the stroop color word interference task. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Working Memory for Location and Time: Activity in Prefrontal Area 46 Relates to Selection Rather than Maintenance in Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  S A Spence,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activity in people with schizophrenia and control subjects , 1998, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[17]  Newell,et al.  A neural basis for general intelligence , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Cerebral regions associated with verbal response initiation, suppression and strategy use , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects. Studies with PET. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[24]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  T. Shallice From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: Converging Operations: Specific Syndromes and Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1988 .

[27]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  J. Desmond,et al.  Dissociation of Frontal and Cerebellar Activity in a Cognitive Task: Evidence for a Distinction between Selection and Search , 1998, NeuroImage.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[30]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  Dissociative methods in the study of frontal lobe function , 2000 .

[31]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[32]  C. Frith,et al.  The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging , 2000 .

[33]  C. Marsden,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.