Decoupling the function of Hox and Shh in developing limb reveals multiple inputs of Hox genes on limb growth

Limb development relies on an exquisite coordination between growth and patterning, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Anterior-posterior and proximal-distal specification initiates in early limb bud concomitantly with the proliferative expansion of limb cells. Previous studies have shown that limb bud growth initially relies on fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) produced in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER-FGFs), the maintenance of which relies on a positive-feedback loop involving sonic hedgehog (Shh) and the BMP antagonist gremlin 1 (Grem1). The positive cross-regulation between Shh and the HoxA and HoxD clustered genes identified an indirect effect of Hox genes on the maintenance of AER-FGFs but the respective function of Shh and Hox genes in this process remains unknown. Here, by uncoupling Hox and Shh function, we show that HoxA and HoxD genes are required for proper AER-FGFs expression, independently of their function in controlling Shh expression. In addition, we provide evidence that the Hox-dependent control of AER-FGF expression is achieved through the regulation of key mesenchymal signals, namely Grem1 and Fgf10, ensuring proper epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Notably, HoxA and HoxD genes contribute to both the initial activation of Grem1 and the subsequent anterior expansion of its expression domain. We propose that the intricate interactions between Hox genes and the FGF and Shh signaling pathways act as a molecular network that ensures proper limb bud growth and patterning, probably contributing to the coordination of these two processes.

[1]  R. Zeller,et al.  Gremlin-mediated BMP antagonism induces the epithelial-mesenchymal feedback signaling controlling metanephric kidney and limb organogenesis , 2004, Development.

[2]  J. Seidman,et al.  Tbx5 is required for forelimb bud formation and continued outgrowth , 2003, Development.

[3]  Philip A Beachy,et al.  Hedgehog-Regulated Processing of Gli3 Produces an Anterior/Posterior Repressor Gradient in the Developing Vertebrate Limb , 2000, Cell.

[4]  B. Olwin,et al.  FGF-2: apical ectodermal ridge growth signal for chick limb development. , 1994, Science.

[5]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  Epiblast‐restricted Cre expression in MORE mice: A tool to distinguish embryonic vs. extra‐embryonic gene function , 2000, Genesis.

[6]  D. Duboule,et al.  Regulation of number and size of digits by posterior Hox genes: a dose-dependent mechanism with potential evolutionary implications. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Multiple roles of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the formation of the mammalian forelimb zeugopod , 2003, Development.

[8]  Satoko Nishimoto,et al.  Hox genes regulate the onset of Tbx5 expression in the forelimb , 2012, Development.

[9]  G. Martin,et al.  Genetic evidence that FGFs have an instructive role in limb proximal–distal patterning , 2008, Nature.

[10]  G. Martin,et al.  The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. , 1995, Development.

[11]  Jianjian Zhu,et al.  Uncoupling Sonic hedgehog control of pattern and expansion of the developing limb bud. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[12]  Hongkai Ji,et al.  A genome-scale analysis of the cis-regulatory circuitry underlying sonic hedgehog-mediated patterning of the mammalian limb. , 2008, Genes & development.

[13]  T. Kuwana,et al.  The mesenchymal factor, FGF10, initiates and maintains the outgrowth of the chick limb bud through interaction with FGF8, an apical ectodermal factor. , 1997, Development.

[14]  D. Duboule,et al.  Interactions between HOXD and Gli3 genes control the limb apical ectodermal ridge via Fgf10. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[15]  R. Zeller,et al.  Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Normal limb development in conditional mutants of Fgf4. , 2000, Development.

[17]  J. Vane,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002 .

[18]  Andrew P. McMahon,et al.  Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity , 1993, Cell.

[19]  R. Paro,et al.  Distinct Roles of Hand2 in Initiating Polarity and Posterior Shh Expression during the Onset of Mouse Limb Bud Development , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[20]  R. Zeller,et al.  Differential regulation of gene expression in the digit forming area of the mouse limb bud by SHH and gremlin 1/FGF-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal signalling , 2006, Development.

[21]  C. Tabin,et al.  Sonic hedgehog and Fgf-4 act through a signaling cascade and feedback loop to integrate growth and patterning of the developing limb bud , 1994, Cell.

[22]  G. Morata,et al.  Colinearity and functional hierarchy among genes of the homeotic complexes. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  A. Joyner,et al.  A mouse model of Greig cephalapolysyndactyly syndrome: the extra-toes J mutation contains an intragenic deletion of the Gli3 gene , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[24]  P. Beachy,et al.  Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[25]  Andrew P. McMahon,et al.  Signal relay by BMP antagonism controls the SHH/FGF4 feedback loop in vertebrate limb buds , 1999, Nature.

[26]  G. Martin,et al.  FGF-4 and BMP-2 have opposite effects on limb growth , 1993, Nature.

[27]  G. Martin,et al.  Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Yina Li,et al.  Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Rolf Zeller,et al.  Progression of Vertebrate Limb Development Through SHH-Mediated Counteraction of GLI3 , 2002, Science.

[30]  K. Moriyama,et al.  Identification of cis‐element regulating expression of the mouse Fgf10 gene during inner ear development , 2005, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[31]  C. Tabin,et al.  Initiation of Proximal-Distal Patterning in the Vertebrate Limb by Signals and Growth , 2011, Science.

[32]  P. Chambon,et al.  Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. , 1997, Development.

[33]  C. Tabin,et al.  Early developmental arrest of mammalian limbs lacking HoxA/HoxD gene function , 2005, Nature.

[34]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Linking Incomplete Reprogramming to the Improved Pluripotency of Murine Embryonal Carcinoma Cell-Derived Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[35]  P. Kraus,et al.  Some distal limb structures develop in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog signaling , 2001, Mechanisms of Development.

[36]  D. Duboule,et al.  A Dual Role for Hox Genes in Limb Anterior-Posterior Asymmetry , 2004, Science.

[37]  K. Schughart,et al.  Hoxd-12 differentially affects preaxial and postaxial chondrogenic branches in the limb and regulates Sonic hedgehog in a positive feedback loop. , 1997, Development.

[38]  D. Duboule,et al.  Regulatory constraints in the evolution of the tetrapod limb anterior–posterior polarity , 2006, Nature.

[39]  D. Duboule,et al.  Large scale transgenic and cluster deletion analysis of the HoxD complex separate an ancestral regulatory module from evolutionary innovations. , 2001, Genes & development.

[40]  C. Tabin,et al.  Expression of Cre recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer , 2002, Genesis.

[41]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Pbx1/Pbx2 requirement for distal limb patterning is mediated by the hierarchical control of Hox gene spatial distribution and Shh expression , 2006, Development.

[42]  S. Kato,et al.  Identification of cis-elements regulating expression of Fgf10 during limb development. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[43]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[44]  G. Martin,et al.  Conditional inactivation of Fgf4 reveals complexity of signalling during limb bud development , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[45]  Rudolf Grosschedl,et al.  Tbx5 is essential for forelimb bud initiation following patterning of the limb field in the mouse embryo , 2003, Development.

[46]  M. Torres,et al.  Diffusible Signals, Not Autonomous Mechanisms, Determine the Main Proximodistal Limb Subdivision , 2011, Science.

[47]  A. McMahon,et al.  Cholesterol Modification of Sonic Hedgehog Is Required for Long-Range Signaling Activity and Effective Modulation of Signaling by Ptc1 , 2001, Cell.

[48]  James F. Martin,et al.  A Self-Regulatory System of Interlinked Signaling Feedback Loops Controls Mouse Limb Patterning , 2009, Science.

[49]  Denis Duboule,et al.  The role of Hox genes during vertebrate limb development. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[50]  S. Gross,et al.  Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 Regulate Chondrocyte Differentiation Upstream of Runx2 and Shox2 in Mice , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  M. Kmita,et al.  Recruitment of 5′ Hoxa genes in the allantois is essential for proper extra-embryonic function in placental mammals , 2012, Development.

[52]  R. Zeller,et al.  Conserved cis-regulatory regions in a large genomic landscape control SHH and BMP-regulated Gremlin1 expression in mouse limb buds , 2012, BMC Developmental Biology.

[53]  Ben Xu,et al.  Axial Hox9 activity establishes the posterior field in the developing forelimb , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.