The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud

Two experiments examined the role of pronunciation rules and of lexical information in pronouncing letter strings. In Experiment 1, subjects pronounced pseudowords varying in the strength of the rules needed to pronounce them, as well as in the availability of a lexical model. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were words varying in rule strength and in usage frequency. The pronunciation times from both experiments displayed an interaction between rules and lexical information: When the rules necessary were strong, the relative availability of lexical information was less important than when the rules were weak. The results were discussed with respect to both traditional dual-process models of pronunciation and models proposing the use of lexical analogies.

[1]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[2]  R. Venezky.  The Structure of English Orthography , 1965 .

[3]  Paul R. Hanna,et al.  Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement , 1966 .

[4]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[5]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[6]  E. Rosch,et al.  Structural bases of typicality effects. , 1976 .

[7]  J. Baron,et al.  Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .

[8]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[9]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition , 1978 .

[10]  John R. Anderson.  Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. , 1978 .

[11]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  R. Glushko.  The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[14]  D W Massaro,et al.  Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  An Interactive Activation Model of the Effect of Context in Perception. Part 2 , 1980 .

[16]  Janice Kay,et al.  One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .

[17]  M. Rosson.  From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation , 1983, Memory & cognition.