How wood fuels' quality relates to the standards: A class-modelling approach

The quality requirements of wood biofuels are regulated by a series of harmonized international standards. These standards define the technical parameter limits that influence the quality of solid biomass as a fuel. In 2014 the European reference standard for solid biofuel was replaced by the International ISO standard. In the case of wood chips, the main difference between the European and International standards is the definition of particle size distribution classes. In this context, this study analyses the quality of wood chips and its variation over the years according to the “former” (EN 14691-4) and “in force” (ISO 17225-4) standards. A Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy (SIMCA) model was built to predict the best quality of wood chips and to clarify the relationship between quality and standard parameters, time and changes in the standard regulations. The results show that, compared to the EN standards, classification with the ISO standards increases the samples belonging to the best quality classes and decreases the not classified samples. Furthermore, all the SIMCA models have a high sensitivity (>90%), reflect the differences introduced to the quality standards and are therefore suitable for monitoring the quality of wood chips and their changes.

[1]  Mikko Hupa,et al.  Chemical forms of ash-forming elements in woody biomass fuels , 2010 .

[2]  M. Forina,et al.  Multivariate range modeling, a new technique for multivariate class modeling: the uncertainty of the estimates of sensitivity and specificity. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[3]  Mariusz J. Stolarski,et al.  Effect of storage methods on willow chips quality , 2016 .

[4]  Jacopo Bacenetti,et al.  Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: Environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management , 2016 .

[5]  M. Hubert,et al.  Robust classification in high dimensions based on the SIMCA Method , 2005 .

[6]  G. Hall,et al.  Estuarine water classification using EEM spectroscopy and PARAFAC-SIMCA. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[7]  Clara Serrano,et al.  Pine chips combustion in a 50 kW domestic biomass boiler , 2013 .

[8]  Monica Casale,et al.  Combining information from headspace mass spectrometry and visible spectroscopy in the classification of the Ligurian olive oils. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[9]  Rami Abdallah,et al.  Experimental study about the effects of disc chipper settings on the distribution of wood chip size , 2011 .

[10]  P. Gilbert,et al.  Maximizing the greenhouse gas reductions from biomass: The role of life cycle assessment , 2015 .

[11]  S. Mekhilef,et al.  A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers , 2011 .

[12]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Giuseppe Zimbalatti,et al.  Roundwood and bioenergy production from forestry: Environmental impact assessment considering different logging systems , 2017 .

[14]  C. Costa,et al.  Spectrophotometric Qualification of Italian Pasta Produced by Traditional or Industrial Production Parameters , 2014, Food and Bioprocess Technology.

[15]  Jay S. Golden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood pellets in the Southeastern United States , 2017 .

[16]  S. Godbout,et al.  Influence of biomass properties on technical and environmental performance of a multi-fuel boiler during on-farm combustion of energy crops , 2015 .

[17]  Christopher C. Berndt,et al.  Bagasse fibre for sustainable manufacturing , 2007 .

[18]  Federico Pallottino,et al.  A multivariate SIMCA index as discriminant in wood pellet quality assessment , 2015 .

[19]  Federico Pallottino,et al.  Colorimetric patterns of wood pellets and their relations with quality and energy parameters , 2014 .

[20]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals , 2001 .

[21]  Roger Bentley,et al.  Assessing the date of the global oil peak: The need to use 2P reserves , 2007 .

[22]  Marco Manzone,et al.  Energy consumption and CO2 analysis of different types of chippers used in wood biomass plantations , 2015 .

[23]  Hans Hartmann,et al.  The effect of raw material and machine setting on chipping performance and fuel quality – a German case study , 2015 .

[24]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer-aided design of experiments , 1981 .

[25]  Mário Costa,et al.  Test of a small domestic boiler using different pellets. , 2004 .

[26]  M. Forina,et al.  Class-modeling techniques, classic and new, for old and new problems , 2008 .

[27]  Raida Jirjis,et al.  Effects of particle size and pile height on storage and fuel quality of comminuted Salix viminalis , 2005 .

[28]  S. Wold,et al.  SIMCA: A Method for Analyzing Chemical Data in Terms of Similarity and Analogy , 1977 .

[29]  Francesca Antonucci,et al.  Influence of diel behaviour in the morphology of decapod natantia , 2009 .

[30]  S. Grigolato,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact of firewood production - A case study in Italy , 2015 .

[31]  P. Lehtikangas.  Quality properties of pelletised sawdust, logging residues and bark , 2001 .

[32]  Kevin McDonnell,et al.  Forest Biomass Supply Chains in Ireland: A Life Cycle Assessment of GHG Emissions and Primary Energy Balances , 2014 .

[33]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Prospects for Bioenergy , 2007 .

[34]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Physical characterization of commercial woodchips on the Italian energy market , 2011 .

[35]  D. Duca,et al.  Fast measurement by infrared spectroscopy as support to woody biofuels quality determination , 2016 .

[36]  Jacopo Bacenetti,et al.  Bridging the gap between reliable data collection and the environmental impact for mechanised field operations , 2017 .

[37]  Nicola La Porta,et al.  Allocation of five macroelements and quality of fuels derived from Norway spruce wood obtained by thinning operations , 2014 .