A Perspective of Peptide Modelling

Were it not for the immense range of biological activities possessed by the peptide hormones and enzyme inhibitors, it seems likely that the molecular modelling of peptides would remain the province of a few dedicated and perhaps slightly masochistic academics. The complexity of the problem arises from the high density of functional groups found in peptides together with their inherent flexibility, which can seldom be studied satisfactorily either by such theoretical means as conformational grid search algorithms devised with ‘small molecules’ in mind, or — worse — by many experimental techniques. Spectral complexity, insolubility and solvent dependence, together with a number of other problems, make spectral analysis difficult, while the assumption that intramolecular interactions will dominate intermolecular ones cannot be made for small peptides in the solid state, and so the structural knowledge gained from X-ray data is difficult to transfer to the solution, gas phase or ‘receptor bound’ structures.

[1]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Configuration entropy of the alanine dipeptide in vacuum and in solution: a molecular dynamics study , 1985 .

[2]  P. Schiller,et al.  Conformational restriction of the phenylalanine residue in a cyclic opioid peptide analogue: effects on receptor selectivity and stereospecificity. , 1991, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  M. Rholam,et al.  Precursors for peptide hormones share common secondary structures forming features at the proteolytic processing sites , 1986, FEBS letters.

[4]  L. Toll,et al.  Conformational determinants of high affinity delta receptor binding of opioid peptides. , 1988, Molecular pharmacology.

[5]  R. Hider,et al.  Snake toxin secondary structure predictions. Structure activity relationships. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Empirical predictions of protein conformation. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[7]  M Kahn,et al.  Examination of HIV-1 protease secondary structure specificity using conformationally constrained inhibitors. , 1991, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Michael E. Johnson,et al.  The design and synthesis of mimetics of peptide β‐turns , 1988 .

[9]  J. Stewart Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I. Method , 1989 .

[10]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Combined use of stereospecific deuteration, NMR, distance geometry, and energy minimization for the conformational analysis of the highly .delta. opioid receptor selective peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin , 1990 .

[11]  H A Scheraga,et al.  A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. I. Conformational predictions for the tandemly repeated peptide (Asn-Ala-Asn-Pro)9. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[12]  M. Braga,et al.  Electronic factor in biological electron transfer systems. Role of aromatic side groups , 1991 .

[13]  Werner Braun,et al.  Efficient search for all low energy conformations of polypeptides by Monte Carlo methods , 1991 .

[14]  W. Clark Still,et al.  An unbounded systematic search of conformational space , 1991 .

[15]  Computer simulation of the conformational properties of retro–inverso peptides. I. Empirical force field calculations of rigid and flexible geometries of N‐acetylglycine‐N′‐ methylamide, bis(acetamido) methane, and N, N′‐ dimethylmalonamide and their corresponding Cα‐methylated analogs , 1983, Biopolymers.

[16]  D. Osguthorpe,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of water behavior around the dipeptide N-acetylalanyl-N-methylamide. , 1980, Science.

[17]  B. Roques,et al.  Proposals for conformation of enkephalins related to opiate mu-pharmacophore. , 1981, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  M. Froimowitz,et al.  Conformational search in enkephalin analogues containing a disulfide bond , 1990, Biopolymers.

[19]  V. Barone,et al.  Sensitivity of peptide conformation to methods and geometrical parameters. A comparative ab initio and molecular mechanics study of oligomers of .alpha.-aminoisobutyric acid , 1990 .

[20]  V. Hruby,et al.  Conformational analysis of enkephalin analogs containing a disulfide bond. Models for delta- and mu-receptor opioid agonists. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[21]  D. Veber,et al.  Bioactive conformation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: evidence from a conformationally constrained analog. , 1980, Science.

[22]  B. Robson,et al.  Conformational behaviour of the architectural units of peptides and proteins. Assessment of current understanding by ab initio quantum mechanical methods and refinement of the dipeptide energy surface. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  A E Howard,et al.  An analysis of current methodologies for conformational searching of complex molecules. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Chain-Folding Initiation Structures in Ribonuclease A: Conformational Free Energy Calculations on Ac-Asn-Pro-Tyr-NHMe, Ac-Tyr-Pro-Asn-NHMe, and Related Peptides , 1984 .

[25]  I. N. Demetropoulos,et al.  A supermolecule study of the effect of hydration on the conformational behaviour of leucine-enkephalin , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[26]  D. Osguthorpe,et al.  Monte carlo simulation of the solvent structure in crystals of a hydrated cyclic peptide , 1980 .

[27]  Momany Fa,et al.  Conformational energy analysis of the molecule, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. I. Native decapeptide. , 1976 .

[28]  D. Cabrol,et al.  Conformational studies on polypeptide models of collagen. Poly(Gly-Pro-Val), poly(Gly-Pro-Met), poly(Gly-Val-Pro) and poly(Gly-Met-Pro). , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[29]  Martin Karplus,et al.  SOLVATION. A MOLECULAR DYNAMICS STUDY OF A DIPEPTIDE IN WATER. , 1979 .

[30]  B. Roques,et al.  Conformational analysis of cholecystokinin CCK26-33 and related fragments by 1H NMR spectroscopy, fluorescence-transfer measurements, and calculations. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[31]  David J. Osguthorpe,et al.  The conformational preferences of γ-lactam and its role in constraining peptide structure , 1990, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[32]  B. Maigret,et al.  Effects of long range interactions on the conformational statistics of short polypeptide chains generated by a Monte Carlo method , 1977 .

[33]  F. Momany,et al.  Local geometry maps and conformational transitions between low-energy conformers of N-acetyl-N′-methyl glycine amide: An ab initio study at the 4–21g level with gradient relaxed geometries , 1985 .

[34]  A. Balázs The effect of the side-chain on the force field of the polypeptide backbone , 1989 .

[35]  A. Hagler,et al.  Computer simulation of the conformational properties of retro–inverso peptides. II. Ab initio study, spatial electron distribution, and population analysis of N‐formylglycine methylamide, N‐formyl N′‐acetyldiaminomethane, and N‐methylmalonamide , 1983, Biopolymers.

[36]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  Constrained search of conformational hyperspace , 1989, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[37]  G H Loew,et al.  Theoretical study of the flexibility and solution conformation of the cyclic opioid peptides [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Pen2,L-Pen5]enkephalin. , 1991, Molecular pharmacology.

[38]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[39]  B. Roques,et al.  Structural requirements for specific recognition of mu or delta opiate receptors. , 1981, Molecular pharmacology.

[40]  D. Cabrol,et al.  Quantum and experimental conformational analysis of model molecules related to collagenic structures , 1988 .

[41]  J H Welsh,et al.  Synthesis, conformational properties, and antibody recognition of peptides containing beta-turn mimetics based on alpha-alkylproline derivatives. , 1991, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  L. Schäfer,et al.  Ab initio studies of structural features not easily amenable to experiment. 23. Molecular structures and conformational analysis of the dipeptide N‐acetyl‐N′‐methyl glycyl amide and the significance of local geometries for peptide structures , 1982 .

[43]  N Go,et al.  Efficient monte carlo method for simulation of fluctuating conformations of native proteins , 1985, Biopolymers.

[44]  A. Hagler,et al.  Theoretical studies of the structure and molecular dynamics of a peptide crystal. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[45]  D J Osguthorpe,et al.  Dynamics and conformational energetics of a peptide hormone: vasopressin. , 1985, Science.

[46]  David Hall,et al.  An appraisal of molecular force fields for the representation of polypeptides , 1984 .

[47]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Theoretical studies of the mechanism of the action of the neurohypophyseal hormones. I. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and molecular electrostatic field (MEF) maps of some vasopressin analogues , 1989, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[48]  P. Gund,et al.  Three-dimensional molecular modeling and drug design. , 1980, Science.

[49]  R. Cramer,et al.  Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field , 1989 .

[50]  E. Giroux,et al.  An acyl-iminium ion cyclization route to a novel conformationally restricted dipeptide mimic: applications to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition , 1987 .

[51]  F. Momany,et al.  Ab initio studies of molecular geometries. 27. Optimized molecular structures and conformational analysis of N.alpha.-acetyl-N-methylalaninamide and comparison with peptide crystal data and empirical calculations , 1983 .

[52]  V J Hruby,et al.  Conformational restrictions of biologically active peptides via amino acid side chain groups. , 1982, Life sciences.

[53]  Angelo Vedani,et al.  YETI: An interactive molecular mechanics program for small‐molecule protein complexes , 1988 .

[54]  David H. Kitson,et al.  Computational conformational analysis of cyclohexaglycyl , 1986 .

[55]  B. Roques,et al.  Delta opioid receptor selectivity induced by conformational constraints in linear enkephalin-related peptides: 1H 400-MHz NMR study and theoretical calculations. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[56]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[57]  M Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of proteins: elements and function. , 1983, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  M. Pesquer,et al.  Computer simulation of the conformational behavior of cholecystokinin fragments: Conformational families of sulfated CCK8 , 1989, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[59]  H. Scheraga,et al.  A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N'-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[60]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Use of buildup and energy‐minimization procedures to compute low‐energy structures of the backbone of enkephalin , 1985, Biopolymers.

[61]  F. Momany,et al.  Conformational energy calculations on enkephalins and enkephalin analogs. Classification of conformations to different configurational types. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[62]  Olle Teleman,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the renin inhibitor H142 in water , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[63]  Lothar Schäfer,et al.  On the use of conformationally dependent geometry trends from ab initio dipeptide and oligopeptide studies in empirical peptide modeling , 1991 .

[64]  F. Momany,et al.  Conformational transitions and geometry differences between low‐energy conformers of N‐acetyl‐N′‐methyl alanineamide: An ab initio study at the 4‐21G level with gradient relaxed geometries , 1984 .

[65]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Prediction of the native conformation of a polypeptide by a statistical‐mechanical procedure. I. Backbone structure of enkephalin , 1985, Biopolymers.

[66]  M. Carson,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Polypeptide Conformational Equilibria: A Progress Report a , 1986 .

[67]  S. Krimm,et al.  Ab initio force fields of glycine dipeptide in C5 and C7 conformations , 1989 .

[68]  On the use of conformationally dependent geometry trends from ab initio dipeptide studies to refine potentials for the empirical force field CHARMM , 1990 .

[69]  Jenn-Huei Lii,et al.  The MM3 force field for amides, polypeptides and proteins , 1991 .

[70]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  A prediction of tertiary structures of peptide by the Monte Carlo simulated annealing method. , 1989, Protein engineering.