Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels

Purpose: Many radiomics features were originally developed for non‐medical imaging applications and therefore original assumptions may need to be reexamined. In this study, we investigated the impact of slice thickness and pixel spacing (or pixel size) on radiomics features extracted from Computed Tomography (CT) phantom images acquired with different scanners as well as different acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The dependence of CT texture features on gray‐level discretization was also evaluated. Methods and materials: A texture phantom composed of 10 different cartridges of different materials was scanned on eight different CT scanners from three different manufacturers. The images were reconstructed for various slice thicknesses. For each slice thickness, the reconstruction Field Of View (FOV) was varied to render pixel sizes ranging from 0.39 to 0.98 mm. A fixed spherical region of interest (ROI) was contoured on the images of the shredded rubber cartridge and the 3D printed, 20% fill, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene plastic cartridge (ABS20) for all phantom imaging sets. Radiomic features were extracted from the ROIs using an in‐house program. Features categories were: shape (10), intensity (16), GLCM (24), GLZSM (11), GLRLM (11), and NGTDM (5), fractal dimensions (8) and first‐order wavelets (128), for a total of 213 features. Voxel‐size resampling was performed to investigate the usefulness of extracting features using a suitably chosen voxel size. Acquired phantom image sets were resampled to a voxel size of 1 × 1 × 2 mm3 using linear interpolation. Image features were therefore extracted from resampled and original datasets and the absolute value of the percent coefficient of variation (%COV) for each feature was calculated. Based on the %COV values, features were classified in 3 groups: (1) features with large variations before and after resampling (%COV >50); (2) features with diminished variation (%COV <30) after resampling; and (3) features that had originally moderate variation (%COV <50%) and were negligibly affected by resampling. Group 2 features were further studied by modifying feature definitions to include voxel size. Original and voxel‐size normalized features were used for interscanner comparisons. A subsequent analysis investigated feature dependency on gray‐level discretization by extracting 51 texture features from ROIs from each of the 10 different phantom cartridges using 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 gray levels. Results: Out of the 213 features extracted, 150 were reproducible across voxel sizes, 42 improved significantly (%COV <30, Group 2) after resampling, and 21 had large variations before and after resampling (Group 1). Ten features improved significantly after definition modification effectively removed their voxel‐size dependency. Interscanner comparison indicated that feature variability among scanners nearly vanished for 8 of these 10 features. Furthermore, 17 out of 51 texture features were found to be dependent on the number of gray levels. These features were redefined to include the number of gray levels which greatly reduced this dependency. Conclusion: Voxel‐size resampling is an appropriate pre‐processing step for image datasets acquired with variable voxel sizes to obtain more reproducible CT features. We found that some of the radiomics features were voxel size and gray‐level discretization‐dependent. The introduction of normalizing factors in their definitions greatly reduced or removed these dependencies.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[3]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Image characterizations based on joint gray level-run length distributions , 1991, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri,et al.  An efficient approach to estimate fractal dimension of textural images , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  A practical method for estimating fractal dimension , 1995, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  M. Kuo,et al.  Radiogenomic analysis to identify imaging phenotypes associated with drug response gene expression programs in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2007, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[9]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Huan Yu,et al.  Coregistered FDG PET/CT-Based Textural Characterization of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Bernard Fertil,et al.  Texture indexes and gray level size zone matrix. Application to cell nuclei classification , 2009 .

[12]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[13]  R. Gillies,et al.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[14]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Developing a classifier model for lung tumors in CT-scan images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. , 2012, Radiology.

[17]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[19]  J. Bradley,et al.  Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. Martel,et al.  High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[22]  Frank J. Brooks,et al.  On some misconceptions about tumor heterogeneity quantification , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[24]  M. Hatt,et al.  Robustness of intratumour 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinomas: relationship with CT characteristics and histologic subtypes. , 2013, Radiology.

[26]  W. Tsai,et al.  Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[27]  H. Hricak,et al.  Radiogenomics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: associations between CT imaging features and mutations. , 2013, Radiology.

[28]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[29]  A OjoJ.,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Textural Features Derived from GLCM for Ultrasound Liver Image Classification , 2014 .

[30]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[31]  P. Lambin,et al.  CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer , 2015, Translational oncology.

[33]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[34]  Fei Yang,et al.  Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[35]  Peter Balter,et al.  Can radiomics features be reproducibly measured from CBCT images for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? , 2015, Medical physics.

[36]  Peter A Balter,et al.  Impact of image preprocessing on the volume dependence and prognostic potential of radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer , 2016 .

[37]  W. Tsai,et al.  Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Robustness of Radiomic Features in [11C]Choline and [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Impact of Segmentation and Discretization , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[39]  H. Aerts,et al.  Applications and limitations of radiomics , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .