A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex

OBJECTIVE The application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bursts at theta frequencies (TBS) may produce lasting neuroplastic changes in the human cortex. However, there exists high variability in subjects' responses, possibly due to non-optimal stimulation characteristics. Here we compare the efficacy of two variations of continuous TBS (cTBS) for producing neuroplastic change in the human primary motor cortex (M1). METHODS The two cTBS paradigms were: (1) standard cTBS (cTBS(std)) (three stimuli at 50Hz, repeated at 5Hz), and (2) modified cTBS (cTBS(mod)) (three stimuli at 30Hz, repeated at 6Hz with intensity). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle before, as well as at 0, 5, 10, 20 and 30min following each paradigm. RESULTS Both cTBS(std) (P=0.05) and cTBS(mod) (P<0.0001) induced a suppression of MEP amplitudes. However, MEP suppression following cTBS(mod) was greater (ANOVA(RM); P=0.02). Experiments using magnetic brainstem stimulation provided evidence that cTBS(mod) induced MEP suppression through cortical mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS The neuroplastic response of the human M1 to cTBS is highly dependent on the stimulation parameters employed. SIGNIFICANCE These findings may have significant implications for the clinical application of cTBS paradigms.

[1]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[2]  P. Tonali,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for ALS A preliminary controlled study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  M. Ridding,et al.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Mechanisms and Applications of Theta-burst rTMS on the Human Motor Cortex , 2009, Brain Topography.

[6]  Walter Senn,et al.  Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: Comparison of 1-Hz and theta burst stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Michael C. Ridding,et al.  Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D Curran-Everett,et al.  Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[9]  P. Wurtz,et al.  Interhemispheric balance of overt attention: a theta burst stimulation study , 2009, European Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  John C Rothwell,et al.  Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  Hippocampal electrical activity and voluntary movement in the rat. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Daniel Zeller,et al.  Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  M. Ridding,et al.  The application of spaced theta burst protocols induces long‐lasting neuroplastic changes in the human motor cortex , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Y. Z. Huang,et al.  Theta‐burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Dario Cazzoli,et al.  One Session of Repeated Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation Trains Induces Long-Lasting Improvement of Visual Neglect , 2009, Stroke.

[19]  B. H. Bland.  The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal formation theta rhythms , 1986, Progress in Neurobiology.

[20]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[21]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Bidirectional long‐term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  P. Wurtz,et al.  Neglect‐like visual exploration behaviour after theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right posterior parietal cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  S. C. Gandevia,et al.  Theta burst stimulation does not reliably depress all regions of the human motor cortex , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  John C Rothwell,et al.  Cortical oscillatory activity and the induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Gabrielle Todd,et al.  Voluntary Movement and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Human Motor Cortex Electromyographic and Force Recordings , 2022 .

[27]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.