The affordances of technology for student teachers to shape their teacher education experience

This chapter describes a case study model to document the evolution over three semesters of a Masters course in technology and language learning for in-service teachers using a social constructivist pedagogical approach (Felix, 2002) within an ecological framework, from completely face to face (F2F) to predominantly online. The focus is on teachers’ acceptance of change in the form of integration of technology first into their learning and second into their teaching, as well as their adaptability to self-managing their learning. The design of the modified course took an experiential modeling approach in which all of the tools and processes that were taught in the course were modeled and experienced by students (teachers) during the semester. These tools include reflective and social computing tools such as chat, blogs, wikis, and e-portfolios, as well as lesson and task-templating software such as Swarthmore Makers, Hot Potatoes, and WebQuest and web page creation software such as Dreamweaver. Based on grounded research methods, techniques such as surveys, problem-based focus groups and short-answer responses were used to ascertain the values of the changes. Some of the information collected from these instruments is presented and compared to the reflective pieces produced by students in their blogs and the projects they created. Due to the multinational composition of the class, some commentary on intercultural perspectives on experiential pedagogy and working with social networking software is also offered.

[1]  R. Oliver,et al.  Exploring system factors that influence community development in online settings , 2005 .

[2]  C. Willig.  Introducing qualitative research in psychology : adventures in theory and method , 2008 .

[3]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Technology in Teacher Education: From Electronic Tutor to Cognitive Tool. Relevant Readings , 1996 .

[4]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[5]  R. A. Bentley,et al.  An introduction to complex systems , 2003 .

[6]  Uschi Felix.  Beyond Babel: Language Learning Online. , 2001 .

[7]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Distance learning – Social software’s killer ap? , 2005 .

[8]  M. D. Roblyer,et al.  How Interactive are YOUR Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning , 2000 .

[9]  Sudarshan Mishra,et al.  Selecting Research Areas and Research Design Approaches in Distance Education: Process Issues , 2004 .

[10]  Cheryl L. Rosaen,et al.  Providing Authentic Contexts for Learning Information Technology in Teacher Preparation. , 2005 .

[11]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  Inclusivity and alignment: Principles of pedagogy, task and assessment design for effective cross‐cultural online learning , 2001 .

[12]  Kathleen P. King,et al.  Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The social affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning environments , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[14]  T. Anderson,et al.  Using Constructivism in Technology-Mediated Learning: Constructing Order out of the Chaos in the Literature , 1999 .

[15]  Uschi Felix,et al.  The web as a vehicle for constructivist approaches in language teaching , 2002, ReCALL.

[16]  Lara L. Lomicka,et al.  Exploring the blogosphere:: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. , 2005 .

[17]  C. Tu,et al.  The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes , 2002 .

[18]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[19]  Joan E. Hughes,et al.  The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-Integrated Pedagogy , 2005 .

[20]  Aisha Salim Ali Al-Harthi,et al.  Distance Higher Education Experiences of Arab Gulf Students in the United States: A cultural perspective , 2006 .

[21]  Zemsky Robert,et al.  Thwarted Innovation : What Happened to e-learning and Why?(Keynote Presentation,Networks without Borders : Towards Cross-Cultural Learning Communities) , 2004 .

[22]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know , 1990 .

[23]  Belle Alderman.  The Role of Interaction in Enhancing Achievement and Student Satisfaction in an Online Course: A Rubric Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Carole Steketee,et al.  Modelling ICT integration in teacher education courses using distributed cognition as a framework , 2006 .

[25]  Steven L. Thor.  Artifacts and Cultures-of-use in Intercultural Communication , 2003 .

[26]  Ken Willing.  Teaching how to learn : learning strategies in ESL , 1989 .

[27]  C. Tu.  How Chinese Perceive Social Presence: An Examination of Interaction in Online Learning Environment , 2001 .

[28]  Jörg Roche,et al.  Intercultural Challenges in Networked Learning: Hard Technologies Meet Soft Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[29]  Anne Bartlett-Bragg.  Blogs @ anywhere: High fidelity online communication , 2005 .

[30]  C. McLoughlin,et al.  Designing Learning Environments for Cultural Inclusivity: A Case Study of Indigenous Online Learning at Tertiary Level. , 2000 .

[31]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  Andrew R. Brown,et al.  Elements of Effective e-Learning Design , 2005 .

[33]  Linda Roehrig Knapp,et al.  Restructuring Schools with Technology , 1995 .

[34]  Thomas Cochrane.  Mobilising learning : A primer for utilising wireless palm devices to facilitate a collaborative learning environment , 2005 .

[35]  Stuart Blythe.  Designing Online Courses: User-Centered Practices. , 2001 .

[36]  Leah P. Macfadyen,et al.  Negotiating Cultures in Cyberspace: Participation Patterns and Problematics , 2004 .