“Remember” source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process

The dual process model assumes memory is based on recollection (retrieval with specific detail) or familiarity (retrieval without specific detail). A current debate is whether recollection is a threshold process or, like familiarity, is a continuous process. In the present study two continuous models and two threshold models of recollection were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. These models included the continuous signal detection unequal variance model and the threshold dual process model. In the study phase of three experiments, objects were presented to the right or left of fixation. At test, participants made either remember–know responses or item confidence responses followed by source memory (spatial location) confidence ratings. Recollection-based ROCs were generated from source memory confidence ratings associated with “remember” responses (in Experiments 1–2) or the highest item confidence responses (in Experiment 3). Neither threshold model adequately fit any of the recollection-based ROCs. By contrast, one or both of the continuous models adequately fit all of the recollection-based ROCs. The present results indicate recollection and familiarity are both continuous processes.

[1]  Rachel A Diana,et al.  The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Geoff Ward,et al.  A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[3]  C. L. Raye,et al.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Signal-Detection, Threshold, and Dual-Process Models of Recognition Memory: ROCs and Conscious Recollection , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  K. Norman,et al.  Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia , 2007, Hippocampus.

[6]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[8]  John T Wixted,et al.  Recollection Is a Continuous Process , 2009, Psychological science.

[9]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[11]  F. Bellezza,et al.  Process dissociation as source monitoring. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  L. Reder,et al.  A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition , 2003 .

[13]  John T Wixted,et al.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Caren M Rotello,et al.  Theremember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Alan Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Recognition memory and decision processes: A meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses , 2002, Memory.

[17]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Response strategies in source monitoring , 1994 .

[19]  Scott D Slotnick,et al.  Aging, source memory, and misrecollections. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Remember/Know Judgments Probe Degrees of Recollection , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[24]  J. Gardiner Functional aspects of recollective experience , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[25]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[26]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[28]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[29]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Six regularities of source recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Lawrence T DeCarlo,et al.  An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[33]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[34]  William E Hockley,et al.  The picture superiority effect in associative recognition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[38]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Barbara L. Chalfonte,et al.  Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing : A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model By : , 2004 .

[40]  L. Davachi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional–neuroanatomic Correlates of Recollection: Implications for Models of Recognition Memory , 2022 .