Non-Kolmogorovian Approach to the Context-Dependent Systems Breaking the Classical Probability Law

There exist several phenomena breaking the classical probability laws. The systems related to such phenomena are context-dependent, so that they are adaptive to other systems. In this paper, we present a new mathematical formalism to compute the joint probability distribution for two event-systems by using concepts of the adaptive dynamics and quantum information theory, e.g., quantum channels and liftings. In physics the basic example of the context-dependent phenomena is the famous double-slit experiment. Recently similar examples have been found in biological and psychological sciences. Our approach is an extension of traditional quantum probability theory, and it is general enough to describe aforementioned contextual phenomena outside of quantum physics.

[1]  K. T. Compton The American Institute of Physics , 1933 .

[2]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  On compound state and mutual information in quantum information theory , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Note on quantum probability , 1983 .

[4]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Some aspects of quantum information theory and their applications to irreversible processes , 1989 .

[5]  T. Inada,et al.  Mechanism responsible for glucose–lactose diauxie in Escherichia coli: challenge to the cAMP model , 1996, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[6]  M. Ohya Complexities and Their Applications to Characterization of Chaos , 1998 .

[7]  Keiko Sato,et al.  APPLICATION OF CHAOS DEGREE TO SOME DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS , 1998, math-ph/9809026.

[8]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Compound Channels, Transition Expectations, and Liftings , 1999 .

[9]  I. V. Volovich,et al.  Semiclassical properties and chaos degree for the quantum Baker’s map , 2002 .

[10]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Foundations of Probability and Physics , 2002 .

[11]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[12]  W. D. Muynck Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach , 2002 .

[13]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  New quantum algorithm for studying NP-complete problems , 2003 .

[14]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  A Stochastic Limit Approach to the SAT Problem , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[15]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  How Can We Observe and Describe Chaos? , 2003, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[16]  R. Balian,et al.  The quantum measurement process: an exactly solvable model , 2003, cond-mat/0408316.

[17]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Quantum-Like Probabilistic Structure of Mental Information , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[18]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Information Processing Explanation of Disjunction Effects , 2006 .

[19]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Reading Bohr: Physics and Philosophy , 2006 .

[20]  Taksu Cheon,et al.  Classical and quantum contents of solvable game theory on Hilbert space , 2006 .

[21]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[22]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Operational Axioms for Quantum Mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0611094.

[23]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like brain: "Interference of minds". , 2006, Bio Systems.

[24]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  ON A QUANTUM MODEL OF THE RECOGNITION PROCESS , 2008 .

[25]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  MARKOV FIELDS ON GRAPHS , 2008 .

[26]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO CHAOS AND NPC PROBLEM , 2008 .

[27]  Fabio Benatti Quantum Algorithmic Complexities and Entropy , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[28]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts , 2009 .

[29]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Mental States Follow Quantum Mechanics During Perception and Cognition of Ambiguous Figures , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[30]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking , 2009 .

[31]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum Markov Model for Data from Shafir-Tversky Experiments in Cognitive Psychology , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[32]  C. Garola,et al.  The ESR model: A proposal for a noncontextual and local Hilbert space extension of QM , 2009 .

[33]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .

[34]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  The problem of quantum-like representation in economy, cognitive science, and genetics , 2009 .

[35]  Taksu Cheon,et al.  Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory , 2010, 1008.2628.

[36]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[37]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[38]  Si Si White Noise Analysis , 2011 .

[39]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum‐like Representation of Bayesian Updating , 2011 .

[40]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  On the Reasonable and Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in Classical and Quantum Physics , 2011 .

[41]  C. Garola,et al.  Generalized Observables, Bell’s Inequalities and Mixtures in the ESR Model for QM , 2010, 1001.4688.

[42]  M. Ohya,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Information and Computation and Its Applications to Nano- and Bio-systems , 2011 .

[43]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-like interference effect in gene expression: glucose-lactose destructive interference , 2011, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[44]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making Process in Two Players Game , 2011 .

[45]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  On Application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad Equation in Cognitive Psychology , 2011, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[46]  C. Fuchs,et al.  A Quantum-Bayesian Route to Quantum-State Space , 2009, 0912.4252.

[47]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum Bio-Informatics IV: From Quantum Information to Bio-Informatics , 2011 .