CASM—The Right Environment for Simulation

The modeller approaching discrete-event simulation has expected and received a high degree of computer support. The processing power simply to run a model and analyse the results would, of course, be taken for granted, but support has gone far beyond this in promoting the easier and speedier construction of models through specialized program structures, languages and lately program generators. Computer graphics capabilities of mini- and microcomputers have been exploited to secure a readier acceptance of simulation models and results. These support facilities constitute the computer environment within which the fortunate modeller works at present. What more could be expected?The work of an L.S.E. group of researchers is guided by a picture of an ideal environment for simulation modelling. We shall describe this picture and illustrate the progress made towards its implementation. Our principal intention is to promote discussion amongst simulation practitioners about their own ‘ideal’ of a computer support environment and the nature of deficiencies in the current systems.

[1]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  A Three-Phase Simulation System Written in Pascal , 1986 .

[2]  S. C. Mathewson Simulation Program Generators: Code and Animation on a P.C. , 1985 .

[3]  Jacques Pasquier-Boltuck Discrete-events simulations models in Pascal MT + on a microcomputer: L. Peter JENNERGREN Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 135 pages, £7.70 , 1986 .

[4]  G. J. Gray,et al.  AUTOSIM: An automatic simulation program generator , 1985 .

[5]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Multifacetted Modelling and Discrete Event Simulation , 1984 .

[6]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Computer Simulation in Management Science (3rd Edition) , 1998 .

[7]  James O. Henriksen,et al.  The Integrated Simulation Environment (Simulation Software of the 1990s) , 1983, Oper. Res..

[8]  Georgios I. Doukidis,et al.  Research into Expert Systems to Aid Simulation Model Formulation , 1985 .

[9]  R. D. Hurrion An Investigation of Visual Interactive Simulation Methods Using the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem , 1978 .

[10]  Robert M. O'Keefe,et al.  Expert Systems and Operational Research-Mutual Benefits , 1985 .

[11]  James Martin,et al.  Application Development Without Programmers , 1981 .

[12]  Simon Peck Intermediate Generality Simulation Software for Production , 1985 .

[13]  John E. Beasley,et al.  O.R. Education — A Survey of Young O.R. Workers , 1984 .

[14]  Brian W. Hollocks Simulation and the Micro , 1983 .

[15]  P. A. Dearnley Software Development for Microcomputer Data Processing Systems , 1982, Comput. J..

[16]  D. Ellison,et al.  How to Write Simulations Using Microcomputers , 1984 .

[17]  Richard E. Nance,et al.  The time and state relationships in simulation modeling , 1981, CACM.

[18]  N. R. Davies On the information content of a discrete-event simulation model , 1976 .

[19]  Averill M. Law,et al.  An Analytical Evaluation of Alternative Strategies in Steady-State Simulation , 1984, Oper. Res..

[20]  Robert M. O'Keefe,et al.  Programming Languages, Microcomputers and O.R. , 1984 .

[21]  Georgios I. Doukidis,et al.  ASPES: A Skeletal Pascal Expert System , 1987 .

[22]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Theory of Modelling and Simulation , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.