Full Configuration Drag Estimation

Accurate drag estimation is critical in making computational design studies. Drag may be estimated thousands of times during a multidisciplinary design optimization, and computational fluid dynamics is not yet possible in these studies. The current model has been developed as part of an air-vehicle conceptual-design multidisciplinary design optimization framework. Its use for subsonic and transonic aircraft configurations is presented and validated. We present our parametric geometry definition, followed by the drag model description. The drag model includes induced, friction, wave, and interference drag. The model is compared with subsonic and transonic isolated wings, and a wing/body configuration used previously in drag prediction workshops. The agreement between the predictions of the drag model and test data is good, but lessens at high lift coefficients and high transonic Mach numbers. In some cases the accuracy of this drag estimation method exceeds much more elaborate analyses.

[1]  E. Hopkins,et al.  An evaluation of theories for predicting turbulent skin friction and heat transfer on flat plates at supersonic and hypersonic Mach numbers , 1971 .

[2]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A Multifidelity Gradient-Free Optimization Method and Application to Aerodynamic Design , 2008 .

[3]  James R. Gloudemans,et al.  A rapid geometry modeler for conceptual aircraft , 1996 .

[4]  Antonio Filippone,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of transport aircraft flight performance , 2008 .

[5]  Joel Grasmeyer,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a transonic strut-braced wing aircraft , 1999 .

[6]  Chang-Yu Liu.  Drag of a Flat Plate with Transition In the Absence of Pressure Gradient , 1972 .

[7]  Richard S. Shevell.  AERODYNAMIC BUGS: CAN CFD SPRAY THEM AWAY? , 1985 .

[8]  F. S. Collier,et al.  Applied aspects of laminar-flow technology , 1990 .

[9]  F. S. Collier,et al.  Laminar flow - The past, present, and prospects , 1989 .

[10]  I. H. Rettie,et al.  Role of Figures of Merit in Design Optimization and Technology Assessment , 1981 .

[11]  R. C. Feagin,et al.  Delta method, an empirical drag buildup technique , 1978 .

[12]  Philippe-Andre Tetrault,et al.  Numerical Prediction of the Interference Drag of a Streamlined Strut Intersecting a Surface in Transonic Flow , 2000 .

[13]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Summary of Data from the First AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2002 .

[14]  William H. Mason,et al.  Analytic models for technology integration in aircraft design , 1990 .

[15]  A. F. Vachris,et al.  QUICK-GEOMETRY, a rapid response method for mathematically modeling configuration geometry , 1975 .

[16]  A. R. Collar.  A Closed Formula for the Drag of a Flat Plate with Transition in the Absence of a Pressure Gradient , 1960, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[17]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Getting the Full Benefits of CFD in Conceptual Design , 1998 .

[18]  Frederick W. Boltz,et al.  Effects of Sweep Angle on the Boundary-Layer Stability Characteristics of an Untapered Wing at Low Speeds , 1960 .

[19]  E. J. Hopkins.  Charts for predicting turbulent skin friction from the Van Driest method (2) , 1972 .

[20]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 2006 .

[21]  F. White.  Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[22]  William F Hilton,et al.  High-speed aerodynamics , 1951 .

[23]  J. Weissinger,et al.  The Lift Distribution of Swept-Back Wings , 1947 .

[24]  B. Kulfan.  Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[25]  Leland M. Nicolai.  Fundamentals of Aircraft Design , 1984 .

[26]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of advanced aircraft configurations , 1997 .

[27]  Richard Shepherd Shevell,et al.  Fundamentals of Flight , 1983 .

[28]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Variable Fidelity Conceptual Design Environment for Revolutionary Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2008 .

[29]  F. Schultz-grunow.  New frictional resistance law for smooth plates , 1941 .

[30]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction , 1999 .

[31]  J. Reneaux,et al.  The use of numerical optimization for airfoil design , 1985 .

[32]  B. E. Tinling,et al.  The effects of Mach number and Reynolds number on the aerodynamic characteristics of several 12-percent-thick wings having 35 degrees of sweepback and various amounts of camber , 1951 .

[33]  W J McCroskey,et al.  A critical assessment of wind tunnel results for the NACA 0012 airfoil , 1987 .

[34]  Brett Malone,et al.  Aircraft concept optimization using parametric multiobjective figures of merit , 1996 .

[35]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Numerical Prediction of Interference Drag of Strut-Surface Intersection in Transonic Flow , 2001 .

[36]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Design of Low-Speed Airfoils by Numerical Optimization , 1975 .

[37]  G. Redeker.  DLR-F4 Wing-Body Configuration. , 1994 .

[38]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[39]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of the Fourth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2010 .

[40]  Barnes W. McCormick,et al.  An Iterative Non-Linear Lifting Line Model For Wings with Unsymmetrical Stall , 1989 .

[41]  Peter Sturdza,et al.  A Rapid Geometry Engine for Preliminary Aircraft Design , 2006 .

[42]  D. B. Spalding,et al.  The drag of a compressible turbulent boundary layer on a smooth flat plate with and without heat transfer , 1964, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[43]  G. R. Inger.  Application of Oswatitsch's theorem to supercritical airfoil drag calculation , 1991 .

[44]  Stephen C. Smith.  A Computational and Experimental Study of Nonlinear Aspects of Induced Drag , 1996 .

[45]  D. Owens.  Weissinger's model of the nonlinear lifting-line method for aircraft design , 1998 .

[46]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design , 1979 .

[47]  Eugene E. Covert,et al.  Prediction and Verification of Aerodynamic Drag, Part I: Prediction. , 1985 .

[48]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Data Summary from Second AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2003 .

[49]  Raymond L. Barger.  An analytical procedure for computing smooth transitions between two specified cross sections with applications to blended wing body configuration , 1982 .

[50]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  Momentum transfer in boundary layers , 1977 .