Comparison of different filtering strategies to reduce noise in strain measurement with digital image correlation

The main limitation of digital image correlation is the remarkable noise affecting the digital image correlation–computed strain distributions. Neither manufacturers of digital image correlation systems nor the literature provide guidelines for optimal filtering of digital image correlation strain distributions. However, filtering is also associated with loss of information (smoothing of the strain gradients). We systematically explored different filtering strategies to reduce noise while minimizing the loss of information in the digital image correlation–computed strain distributions. The first filtering strategy was directly applied to the acquired images that were then fed to the digital image correlation software. Median adaptive low-pass filters and notch filters were used to eliminate noise: both strategies increased (rather than reducing) the noise in the digital image correlation–computed strain distributions. The second strategy explored was a Gaussian low-pass filtering of the strain distributions. When the optimal cutoff frequency was selected, the noise was remarkably reduced (by 70%) without excessive loss of information. At the same time, when non-optimal cutoff frequencies were used, the residual noise and/or loss of information seriously compromised the results. Finally, image combination techniques were applied both to the input images and to the strain distributions. This strategy was extremely time-consuming but not very effective (noise reduction <10%). In conclusion, the only truly effective noise reduction strategy, if measurements are carried out using commercial closed software, consists in filtering the strain distribution.

[1]  Pascal Doumalin,et al.  Digital Image Correlation accuracy: influence of kind of speckle and recording setup , 2010 .

[2]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[3]  Mario Bertero,et al.  Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging , 1998 .

[4]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of a speckle pattern in the digital image correlation method by mean subset fluctuation , 2011 .

[5]  W. D. Callister,et al.  Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction -9/E. , 2015 .

[6]  Jubing Chen,et al.  Image pre-filtering for measurement error reduction in digital image correlation , 2015 .

[7]  Y. Wang,et al.  Investigation of the Uncertainty of DIC Under Heterogeneous Strain States with Numerical Tests , 2012 .

[8]  S. Roux,et al.  Comparison of Local and Global Approaches to Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[9]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[10]  Jun Ma,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. , 2011, Optics letters.

[11]  Sun Yaofeng,et al.  Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images , 2007 .

[12]  Pascal Doumalin,et al.  Strain Measurement by Digital Image Correlation: Influence of Two Types of Speckle Patterns Made from Rigid or Deformable Marks , 2012 .

[13]  Jean-Noël Périé,et al.  Unstructured finite element-based digital image correlation with enhanced management of quadrature and lens distortions , 2016 .

[14]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark , 2013 .

[15]  Jianguo Zhu,et al.  Study of the performance of different subpixel image correlation methods in 3D digital image correlation. , 2010, Applied optics.

[16]  W. Tong An Evaluation of Digital Image Correlation Criteria for Strain Mapping Applications , 2005 .

[17]  Alessandro Freddi,et al.  Experimental Stress Analysis for Materials and Structures. Stress Analysis Models for Developing Design Methodologies , 2015 .

[18]  J. L. Cam,et al.  A Review of the Challenges and Limitations of Full-Field Measurements Applied to Large Heterogeneous Deformations of Rubbers , 2012 .

[19]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[20]  J. Janesick,et al.  Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices , 2001 .

[21]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  A practical approach to optimizing the preparation of speckle patterns for digital-image correlation , 2014 .

[22]  Martin Lévesque,et al.  Image‐based Continuous Displacement Measurements Using an Improved Spectral Approach , 2013 .

[23]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Signal Processing 4th Edition , 2006 .

[24]  M. Sutton,et al.  Gaussian Pre-Filtering for Uncertainty Minimization in Digital Image Correlation Using Numerically-Designed Speckle Patterns , 2015 .

[25]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[26]  Julien Réthoré,et al.  On the Use of NURBS Functions for Displacement Derivatives Measurement by Digital Image Correlation , 2010 .

[27]  S. Choi,et al.  Measurement of deformations on concrete subjected to compression using image correlation , 1997 .

[28]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  Comparison of two approaches for differentiating full-field data in solid mechanics , 2009 .