Sensitivity analysis: an aid for belief-network quantification

When building a Bayesian belief network, usually a large number of probabilities have to be assessed by experts in the domain of application. Experience shows that experts are often reluctant to assess all probabilities required, feeling that they are unable to give assessments with a high level of accuracy. We argue that the elicitation of probabilities from experts can be supported to a large extent by iteratively performing sensitivity analyses of the belief network in the making, starting with rough, initial assessments. Since it gives insight into which probabilities require a high level of accuracy and which do not, performing a sensitivity analysis allows for focusing further elicitation efforts. We propose an elicitation procedure in which, alternately, sensitivity analyses are performed and probability assessments refined, until satisfactory behaviour of the belief network is obtained, until the costs of further elicitation outweigh the benefits of higher accuracy or until higher accuracy can no longer be attained due to lack of knowledge.

[1]  P J Lucas,et al.  Converting a rule-based expert system into a belief network. , 1993, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[2]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[3]  Silja Renooij,et al.  How to Elicit Many Probabilities , 1999, UAI.

[4]  Niels Peek,et al.  Using sensitivity analysis for efficient quantification of a belief network , 1999, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[5]  L. C. van der Gaag,et al.  Practicable sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks , 1998 .

[6]  D. Heckerman,et al.  Toward Normative Expert Systems: Part I The Pathfinder Project , 1992, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[8]  L. C. van der Gaag,et al.  Index expression belief networks for information disclosure , 1994 .

[9]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems , 1990 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[11]  Niels Peek,et al.  Developing a Decision-Theoretic Network for a Congenital Heart Disease , 1997, AIME.

[12]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[13]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  The ALARM Monitoring System: A Case Study with two Probabilistic Inference Techniques for Belief Networks , 1989, AIME.

[14]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  NESTOR: A Computer-Based Medical Diagnostic Aid That Integrates Causal and Probabilistic Knowledge. , 1984 .

[15]  J D Habbema,et al.  Analysing clinical decision analyses. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  MUNIN - A Causal Probabilistic Network for Interpretation of Electromyographic Findings , 1987, IJCAI.

[17]  Marek J. Druzdzel,et al.  Elicitation of Probabilities for Belief Networks: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information , 1995, UAI.