Co-Definition of Product Structure and Production Network for Frugal Innovation Perspectives: Towards a Modular-based Approach

Abstract Frugal innovation theory is proposed to help companies rethinking their current product design and production strategies facing competitive challenges. Co-evolution of product and production systems is required to reach frugality goals. The success of the co-evolution strategy should be based on robust models ensuring the global consistency of the whole development process. Modular-based models are a good solution for such problematics since they provide a common semantic for the representation of the physical product structure as well as the organizational structure of the production system through the definition of interfaces between elements and the hierarchical decomposition of a system into different elements. This paper proposes a conceptual modular-based approach dealing with the selection of product modules influencing the selection of suppliers and the allocation of orders in a global production network. The indirect linking of the customer to production is also discussed in terms of the timewise restrictions in selecting product modules offering the customer a maximum degree of flexibility in product specification.

[1]  Jan Dörmer Produktionsprogrammplanung bei variantenreicher Fließproduktion , 2013 .

[2]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  SPECIES—Co-evolution of products, processes and production systems , 2010 .

[3]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Fundamentals of product family architecture , 2000 .

[4]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets , 2011 .

[5]  A. Brem,et al.  Frugal and reverse innovation - Literature overview and case study insights from a German MNC in India and China , 2012, 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation.

[6]  Mari Sako,et al.  Modularity and Outsourcing , 2003 .

[7]  Hans Peter Lomholt Bruun,et al.  PLM support to architecturebased development: Contribution to computer-supported architecture modelling , 2015 .

[8]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[9]  Herbert Meyr,et al.  Structure of Advanced Planning Systems , 2015 .

[10]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Frugal Innovation: A Global Networks' Perspective , 2012 .

[11]  Xuehong Du,et al.  Product Families for Mass Customization , 2003 .

[12]  S. H. Cheraghi,et al.  Critical Success Factors For Supplier Selection: An Update , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Planning of capacities and orders in build-to-order automobile production: A review , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  P. Dicken,et al.  Global production networks: realizing the potential , 2008 .

[15]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Product Variety Management , 1998 .

[16]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[18]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems , 1988 .