The Development of a Conflict Hazardous Assessment Model for Evaluating Urban Intersection Safety

Road safety conditions in China have worsened following rapid urbanization and motorization. For a long time now, China has ranked first in the world in the number of road accidents and fatalities. Therefore, evaluating safety levels is essential to implementing effective countermeasures. For developing countries like China, however, assessing safety levels via crash data statistical analysis is difficult because of limitations on a short history of collecting crash data, small samples and an incomplete collection of information. To address these limitations, the method of surrogate safety analysis using the traffic conflict technique (TCT) has become a widely used evaluation procedure. On the basis of the mechanism analysis of TCT, the paper presents a conflict hazardous assessment model (CHAM) for the mixed traffic safety evaluation of urban intersections. In the proposed model, the principle of the conservation of momentum is used. CHAM is a model used for assessing safety levels from the aspects of severe conflict numbers and conflict hazardous levels (CHLs) when traffic conflicts among mixed-traffic modes occur. Factors such as the conflict type and conflict angle of different traffic modes, weight and velocity are considered and incorporated into the model through the integration of the accident collision theory and the head injury criterion (HIC) index for head hazard assessments. The calibration and validation of CHL models are also carried out using 341 intersection crash reports in Beijing from 2006 to 2008. The results show that the established CHL models have good validity.

[1]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: Experimental analysis of power , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Carol Conroy,et al.  The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity of drivers in head-on motor vehicle crashes. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  R Madro,et al.  Ankle joint injuries as a reconstruction parameter in car-to-pedestrian accidents. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[4]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[5]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict standards for intersections , 1999 .

[6]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Analysis and prediction of traffic fatalities resulting from angle collisions including the effect of vehicles' configuration and compatibility. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring the overall and specific crash severity levels at signalized intersections. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Mark J. Kaiser,et al.  The Head Injury Criterion (HIC) functional , 1998, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[10]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  Measurement of traffic conflicts , 1997 .

[11]  Lynn B. Fricke,et al.  Traffic Accident Reconstruction , 1990 .

[12]  W. D. Glauz,et al.  EXPECTED TRAFFIC CONFLICT RATES AND THEIR USE IN PREDICTING ACCIDENTS , 1985 .

[13]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Development of a Road Safety Risk Index , 2002 .

[14]  Ronald Pfefer,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 12: A GUIDE FOR REDUCING COLLISIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2004 .

[15]  Jian Lu,et al.  Level-of-Safety Service for Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Intersections , 2008 .

[16]  Raymond J Kiefer,et al.  Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Melissa J. Williams,et al.  Validity of the traffic conflicts technique , 1981 .

[18]  Li Ke-ping,et al.  Traffic Conflict Simulation Analysis for Urban Road Intersection , 2009 .

[19]  Keping Li,et al.  Calibration and Validation Procedure for Intersection Safety Simulation using SSAM and VISSIM , 2010 .

[20]  Christer Hydén,et al.  Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  K Mizuno,et al.  Compatibility problems in frontal, side, single car collisions and car-to-pedestrian accidents in Japan. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  E Hauer,et al.  Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Severe-to-fatal head injuries in motor vehicle impacts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.