Benefits and limitations of porous substrates as biosensors for protein adsorption.

Porous substrates have gained widespread interest for biosensor applications based on molecular recognition. Thus, there is a great demand to systematically investigate the parameters that limit the transport of molecules toward and within the porous matrix as a function of pore geometry. Finite element simulations (FES) and time-resolved optical waveguide spectroscopy (OWS) experiments were used to systematically study the transport of molecules and their binding on the inner surface of a porous material. OWS allowed us to measure the kinetics of protein adsorption within porous anodic aluminum oxide membranes composed of parallel-aligned, cylindrical pores with pore radii of 10-40 nm and pore depths of 0.8-9.6 μm. FES showed that protein adsorption on the inner surface of a porous matrix is almost exclusively governed by the flux into the pores. The pore-interior surface nearly acts as a perfect sink for the macromolecules. Neither diffusion within the pores nor adsorption on the surface are rate limiting steps, except for very low rate constants of adsorption. While adsorption on the pore walls is mainly governed by the stationary flux into the pores, desorption from the inner pore walls involves the rate constants of desorption and adsorption, essentially representing the protein-surface interaction potential. FES captured the essential features of the OWS experiments such as the initial linear slopes of the adsorption kinetics, which are inversely proportional to the pore depth and linearly proportional to protein concentration. We show that protein adsorption kinetics allows for an accurate determination of protein concentration, while desorption kinetics could be used to capture the interaction potential of the macromolecules with the pore walls.

[1]  A. Minton,et al.  Analysis of mass transport-limited binding kinetics in evanescent wave biosensors. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  W. Deen Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid‐filled pores , 1987 .

[3]  W. Knoll,et al.  Mounted nanoporous anodic alumina thin films as planar optical waveguides. , 2010, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[4]  Lisa M. Bonanno,et al.  Label-free porous silicon immunosensor for broad detection of opiates in a blind clinical study and results comparison to commercial analytical chemistry techniques. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Michael J Sailor,et al.  A label-free porous alumina interferometric immunosensor. , 2009, ACS nano.

[6]  Hans Söderlund,et al.  Antibody-Based Bio-Nanotube Membranes for Enantiomeric Drug Separations , 2002, Science.

[7]  R. Probstein Physicochemical Hydrodynamics: An Introduction , 1989 .

[8]  E. Pereira,et al.  Active waveguide effects from porous anodic alumina: An optical sensor proposition , 2010 .

[9]  Sara D. Alvarez,et al.  Porous SiO2 interferometric biosensor for quantitative determination of protein interactions: binding of protein A to immunoglobulins derived from different species. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  I. Vlassiouk,et al.  "Direct" detection and separation of DNA using nanoporous alumina filters. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  J L Sussman,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of avidin and the avidin-biotin complex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Antony Murphy,et al.  High-performance biosensing using arrays of plasmonic nanotubes. , 2010, ACS nano.

[13]  Benjamin L Miller,et al.  Quantatitive assessment of enzyme immobilization capacity in porous silicon. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  C. Steinem,et al.  Piezoelectric Mass-Sensing Devices as Biosensors-An Alternative to Optical Biosensors? , 2000, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  Kornelius Nielsch,et al.  Hexagonal pore arrays with a 50-420 nm interpore distance formed by self-organization in anodic alumina , 1998 .

[16]  W. Lukosz,et al.  Integrated optical difference interferometer as biochemical sensor , 1994 .

[17]  Robert M. Metzger,et al.  On the Growth of Highly Ordered Pores in Anodized Aluminum Oxide , 1998 .

[18]  D G Myszka,et al.  Advances in surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[19]  E. Lorenzo,et al.  AFM, SECM and QCM as useful analytical tools in the characterization of enzyme-based bioanalytical platforms. , 2010, The Analyst.

[20]  Michael J Sailor,et al.  A stable, label-free optical interferometric biosensor based on TiO2 nanotube arrays. , 2010, ACS nano.

[21]  Liang Feng,et al.  Colorimetric sensor array for determination and identification of toxic industrial chemicals. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  W. Knoll,et al.  Interfaces and thin films as seen by bound electromagnetic waves. , 1998, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[23]  P. Schuck,et al.  Use of surface plasmon resonance to probe the equilibrium and dynamic aspects of interactions between biological macromolecules. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[24]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Template-imprinted nanostructured surfaces for protein recognition , 1999, Nature.

[25]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces. , 2011, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[26]  Ralf B. Wehrspohn,et al.  Self-ordering Regimes of Porous Alumina: The 10% Porosity Rule , 2002 .

[27]  G. C. Wood,et al.  The morphology and mechanism of formation of porous anodic films on aluminium , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  D G Myszka,et al.  Extending the range of rate constants available from BIACORE: interpreting mass transport-influenced binding data. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Makoto Fujimaki,et al.  Influence of nanometric holes on the sensitivity of a waveguide-mode sensor: label-free nanosensor for the analysis of RNA aptamer-ligand interactions. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  Michael J. Sailor,et al.  A Porous Silicon Optical Biosensor: Detection of Reversible Binding of IgG to a Protein A-Modified Surface , 1999 .

[31]  John D Brennan,et al.  Surface immobilization of structure-switching DNA aptamers on macroporous sol-gel-derived films for solid-phase biosensing applications. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  On the adsorption behavior of biotin-binding proteins on gold and silica. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  W. Knoll,et al.  Long range surface plasmon and hydrogel optical waveguide field-enhanced fluorescence biosensor with 3D hydrogel binding matrix: on the role of diffusion mass transfer. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[34]  W. Knoll,et al.  Polycyanurate nanorod arrays for optical-waveguide-based biosensing. , 2010, Nano letters.

[35]  W. Knoll,et al.  Polyelectrolyte layer-by-layer deposition in cylindrical nanopores. , 2010, ACS nano.

[36]  David R Walt Ubiquitous sensors: when will they be here? , 2009, ACS nano.

[37]  D G Myszka,et al.  Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[38]  Andreas Janshoff,et al.  Quartz Crystal Microbalance for Bioanalytical Applications , 2001 .

[39]  Sui-Lam Wong,et al.  Engineering Soluble Monomeric Streptavidin with Reversible Biotin Binding Capability* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Tatsuro Endo,et al.  Label-free detection of peptide nucleic acid-DNA hybridization using localized surface plasmon resonance based optical biosensor. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  J. Buriak,et al.  Block copolymer templated etching on silicon. , 2007, Nano letters.

[42]  W. Knoll,et al.  Highly sensitive detection of processes occurring inside nanoporous anodic alumina templates : a waveguide optical study , 2004 .

[43]  P. Schuck,et al.  Reliable determination of binding affinity and kinetics using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. , 1997, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[44]  Yang Jiao,et al.  Size-Dependent Infiltration and Optical Detection of Nucleic Acids in Nanoscale Pores , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[45]  P. Hemker,et al.  Label-free assessment of high-affinity antibody-antigen binding constants. Comparison of bioassay, SPR, and PEIA-ellipsometry. , 2011, Journal of immunological methods.

[46]  W. Deen,et al.  Effects of molecular size and configuration on diffusion in microporous membranes , 1981 .