A Decision-Making Perspective on Coaching Behavior Change: A Field Experiment on Promoting Exercise at Work

We discuss a decision-making perspective on coaching behavior change and report a field experiment following the perspective in which we promoted physical exercises at work using an e-coaching app. More specifically, we investigated what are the important attributes that influence the attractiveness of exercise options, and whether showing an extreme option would nudge users to do more exercises (a.k.a. compromise effect). Seventy participants were coached by the app BeActive! for 10 days to consider taking breaks at work twice a day to do simple exercises. Through choice modeling, it was found that people cared more about whether the exercise options would reduce their productivity at work and whether doing the exercises were socially embarrassing, than the health benefits of the exercise options. The results did not reveal the compromise effect, but rather an effect in the opposite direction, supporting an alternative model that people make decisions hierarchically. Potentials and challenges of taking the decision-making perspective in behavior change research are discussed based on what we learned from the experiment.

[1]  Bart Kamphorst,et al.  Why option generation matters for the design of autonomous e-coaching systems , 2014, AI & SOCIETY.

[2]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing Technology for Just-in-Time Motivation of Behavior Change , 2004, MedInfo.

[3]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[4]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[5]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[6]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[7]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[8]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Finding Kairos: The Influence of Context-Based Timing on Compliance with Well-Being Triggers , 2016, Symbiotic.

[9]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Information processing as a paradigm for decision making. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[11]  Sudeep Bhatia,et al.  Associations and the accumulation of preference. , 2013, Psychological review.

[12]  Sabrina Thai,et al.  ExperienceSampler: An Open-Source Scaffold for Building Smartphone Apps for Experience Sampling , 2018, Psychological methods.

[13]  Guillaume Faddoul,et al.  What's Your 2%? A Pilot Study for Encouraging Physical Activity Using Persuasive Video and Social Media , 2014, PERSUASIVE.

[14]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .