Rapid electromagnetic-based microwave design optimisation exploiting shape-preserving response prediction and adjoint sensitivities

A new development of the shape-preserving response prediction (SPRP) technique for microwave design optimisation is presented here. The original SPRP method is enhanced by employing low-cost derivative information obtained through adjoint sensitivities. The authors propose using operator notation to simplify the SPRP surrogate description. The enhancement through sensitivity data is twofold: to ensure first-order consistency between the SPRP surrogate and the high-fidelity electromagnetic (EM) model under optimisation and to speed up the surrogate optimisation process. Fast surrogate optimisation allows us to use coarse-discretisation EM simulations as an underlying low-fidelity model and, therefore, efficiently apply SPRP to cases where reliable circuit models are not available (e.g. design of antenna structures). The proposed approach is demonstrated using a dielectric resonator filter and an ultra-wideband monopole antenna. Comparison with three benchmark techniques, including the original SPRP methods, space mapping with sensitivity and direct optimisation of the high-fidelity model, is also provided.

[1]  R. Lewis,et al.  An Overview of First-Order Model Management for Engineering Optimization , 2001 .

[2]  J.C. Rautio EM-Component-Based Design of Planar Circuits , 2007, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[3]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space Mapping With Adaptive Response Correction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[4]  S. Koziel,et al.  A Space-Mapping Framework for Engineering Optimization—Theory and Implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[5]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Shape-preserving response prediction with adjoint sensitivities for microwave design optimization , 2013, 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT).

[6]  S Koziel,et al.  Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Microwave Design Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  Lei Xia,et al.  Support Vector Regression Model for Millimeter Wave Transitions , 2007 .

[8]  Qi-Jun Zhang,et al.  Neural Network Inverse Modeling and Applications to Microwave Filter Design , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Quality assessment of coarse models and surrogates for space mapping optimization , 2008 .

[10]  L. Encica,et al.  Aggressive Output Space-Mapping Optimization for Electromagnetic Actuators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  Jon P. Webb,et al.  Optimization of microwave devices using 3-D finite elements and the design sensitivity of the frequency response , 2003 .

[12]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space mapping , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[14]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[15]  G. Macchiarella,et al.  Microwave filter design by synthesis and optimization , 2007, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[17]  M.C.E. Yagoub,et al.  Efficient analytical formulation and sensitivity analysis of neuro-space mapping for nonlinear microwave device modeling , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[18]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[19]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Robust space mapping optimization exploiting EM-based models with adjoint sensitivities , 2012, 2012 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[20]  Young-Seek Chung,et al.  Optimal design method for microwave device using time domain method and design sensitivity analysis. II. FDTD case , 2001 .

[21]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .