Crawling and turning in a minimal reaction-diffusion cell motility model: Coupling cell shape and biochemistry.

We study a minimal model of a crawling eukaryotic cell with a chemical polarity controlled by a reaction-diffusion mechanism describing Rho GTPase dynamics. The size, shape, and speed of the cell emerge from the combination of the chemical polarity, which controls the locations where actin polymerization occurs, and the physical properties of the cell, including its membrane tension. We find in our model both highly persistent trajectories, in which the cell crawls in a straight line, and turning trajectories, where the cell transitions from crawling in a line to crawling in a circle. We discuss the controlling variables for this turning instability and argue that turning arises from a coupling between the reaction-diffusion mechanism and the shape of the cell. This emphasizes the surprising features that can arise from simple links between cell mechanics and biochemistry. Our results suggest that similar instabilities may be present in a broad class of biochemical descriptions of cell polarity.

[1]  Nadine Peyriéras,et al.  Inhibitory signalling to the Arp2/3 complex steers cell migration , 2013, Nature.

[2]  T. Ohta,et al.  Oscillatory motions of an active deformable particle. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape , 2011, PLoS biology.

[4]  M. Sano,et al.  Simple model of cell crawling , 2015, 1509.05215.

[5]  Marc Herant,et al.  Form and function in cell motility: from fibroblasts to keratocytes. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Dynamics of a deformable self-propelled domain , 2010, 1003.0755.

[7]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A Computational Model of Cell Polarization and Motility Coupling Mechanics and Biochemistry , 2010, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[8]  Collins,et al.  Diffuse interface model of diffusion-limited crystal growth. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  George Oster,et al.  Force generation by actin polymerization II: the elastic ratchet and tethered filaments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Giuseppe Buttazzo,et al.  Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , 1988 .

[11]  P. Bates,et al.  Mullins-Sekerka motion of small droplets on a fixed boundary , 2000 .

[12]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Decoding Information in Cell Shape , 2013, Cell.

[13]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging of Signaling Molecules in Living Cells , 2000 .

[14]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Periodic migration in a physical model of cells on micropatterns. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[15]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility , 1992 .

[16]  D. Odde,et al.  Potential for Control of Signaling Pathways via Cell Size and Shape , 2006, Current Biology.

[17]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Actin Disassembly 'clock' and Membrane Tension Determine Cell Shape and Turning: a Mathematical Model Actin Disassembly 'clock' and Membrane Tension Determine Cell Shape and Turning: a Mathematical Model , 2010 .

[18]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Non-Brownian dynamics and strategy of amoeboid cell locomotion. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[21]  S. Schuster,et al.  Osmotic stress response in Dictyostelium is mediated by cAMP , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Klaus Kassner,et al.  Phase-field approach to three-dimensional vesicle dynamics. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Falko Ziebert,et al.  Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[24]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Computational approach for modeling intra- and extracellular dynamics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Polarity mechanisms such as contact inhibition of locomotion regulate persistent rotational motion of mammalian cells on micropatterns , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Multiple scale model for cell migration in monolayers: Elastic mismatch between cells enhances motility , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[27]  F. Raynaud,et al.  Minimal model for spontaneous cell polarization and edge activity in oscillating, rotating and migrating cells , 2016, Nature Physics.

[28]  Elsen Tjhung,et al.  Spontaneous symmetry breaking in active droplets provides a generic route to motility , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  K R Elder,et al.  Sharp interface limits of phase-field models. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Linking morphodynamics and directional persistence of T lymphocyte migration , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[33]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Computational model for cell morphodynamics. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[34]  J. Theriot,et al.  Biophysical Aspects of Actin-Based Cell Motility in Fish Epithelial Keratocytes , 2008 .

[35]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Takao Ohta,et al.  Deformable self-propelled particles. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[37]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Jakob Löber,et al.  Modeling crawling cell movement on soft engineered substrates. , 2014, Soft matter.

[39]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Dynamic membrane patterning, signal localization and polarity in living cells. , 2015, Soft matter.

[40]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A Comparison of Computational Models for Eukaryotic Cell Shape and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Igor S. Aranson,et al.  Computational approaches to substrate-based cell motility , 2016 .

[42]  A. Jilkine.  A wave-pinning mechanism for eukaryotic cell polarization based on Rho GTPase dynamics , 2009 .

[43]  Takao Ohta,et al.  Soft deformable self-propelled particles , 2012 .

[44]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[45]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Cell Shape and Negative Links in Regulatory Motifs Together Control Spatial Information Flow in Signaling Networks , 2008, Cell.

[46]  Xiangrong Li,et al.  SOLVING PDES IN COMPLEX GEOMETRIES: A DIFFUSE DOMAIN APPROACH. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.

[47]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Xinfu Chen,et al.  Motion of a droplet by surface tension along the boundary , 2000 .

[49]  Samuel A. Ramirez,et al.  Dendritic spine geometry can localize GTPase signaling in neurons , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[50]  M. Haataja,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of compositional interface fluctuations in planar lipid bilayer membranes. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.

[52]  Jelena Stajic,et al.  Redundant mechanisms for stable cell locomotion revealed by minimal models. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[53]  Jean-François Rupprecht,et al.  Actin Flows Mediate a Universal Coupling between Cell Speed and Cell Persistence , 2015, Cell.

[54]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  T. Ohta,et al.  Deformation of a self-propelled domain in an excitable reaction-diffusion system. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[57]  Davide Marenduzzo,et al.  Phase separation dynamics on curved surfaces , 2013 .

[58]  A. Gautreau,et al.  The Arp2/3 inhibitory protein arpin induces cell turning by pausing cell migration , 2015, Cytoskeleton.

[59]  Igor S. Aranson,et al.  Collisions of deformable cells lead to collective migration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[60]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Modelling Cell Polarization Driven by Synthetic Spatially Graded Rac Activation , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[61]  A. Goryachev,et al.  Curvature-driven positioning of Turing patterns in phase-separating curved membranes. , 2016, Soft matter.

[62]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A genetically-encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells , 2009, Nature.

[63]  M. Cates,et al.  A minimal physical model captures the shapes of crawling cells , 2015, Nature Communications.

[64]  Marten Postma,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling modules join hands at front and tail , 2004, EMBO reports.

[65]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Asymptotic and Bifurcation Analysis of Wave-Pinning in a Reaction-Diffusion Model for Cell Polarization , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[66]  James A. Warren,et al.  PHASE-FIELD SIMULATION OF SOLIDIFICATION 1 , 2002 .

[67]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[68]  G. Papoian,et al.  Supplemental Information : Mechano-Chemical Feedbacks Regulate Actin Mesh Growth in Lamellipodial Protrusions , 2010 .