A Sound Processor for Cochlear Implant Using a Simple Dual Path Nonlinear Model of Basilar Membrane

We propose a new active nonlinear model of the frequency response of the basilar membrane in biological cochlea called the simple dual path nonlinear (SDPN) model and a novel sound processing strategy for cochlear implants (CIs) based upon this model. The SDPN model was developed to utilize the advantages of the level-dependent frequency response characteristics of the basilar membrane for robust formant representation under noisy conditions. In comparison to the dual resonance nonlinear model (DRNL) which was previously proposed as an active nonlinear model of the basilar membrane, the SDPN model can reproduce similar level-dependent frequency responses with a much simpler structure and is thus better suited for incorporation into CI sound processors. By the analysis of dominant frequency component, it was confirmed that the formants of speech are more robustly represented after frequency decomposition by the nonlinear filterbank using SDPN, compared to a linear bandpass filter array which is used in conventional strategies. Acoustic simulation and hearing experiments in subjects with normal hearing showed that the proposed strategy results in better syllable recognition under speech-shaped noise compared to the conventional strategy based on fixed linear bandpass filters.

[1]  Laurel H Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P.C. Laizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  Q. Fu,et al.  Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Jay T Rubinstein,et al.  How cochlear implants encode speech , 2004, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[5]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  A composite auditory model for processing speech sounds. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Acoustic Simulations of Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (EAS) , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[8]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[9]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A Robert,et al.  A composite model of the auditory periphery for simulating responses to complex sounds. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Ray Meddis,et al.  The temporal representation of speech in a nonlinear model of the guinea pig cochlea. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  P C Loizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[13]  Jin Ho Kim,et al.  An Improved Speech Processing Strategy for Cochlear Implants Based on an Active Nonlinear Filterbank Model of the Biological Cochlea , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  I. Winter,et al.  The representation of steady-state vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of the guinea pig cochlear nerve and primarylike cochlear nucleus neurons. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  P C Loizou,et al.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  L. Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J Wouters,et al.  Enhancing the speech envelope of continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Eric D Young,et al.  Discrimination of Voiced Stop Consonants Based on Auditory Nerve Discharges , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .