Experimental designs for phase I and phase I/II dose-finding studies

We review the rationale behind the statistical design of dose-finding studies as used in phase I and phase I/II clinical trials. We underline what the objectives of such dose-finding studies should be and why the widely used standard design fails to meet any of these objectives. The standard design is a ‘memoryless’ design and we discuss how this impacts on practical behaviour. Designs introduced over the last two decades can be viewed as designs with memory and we discuss how these designs are superior to memoryless designs. By superior we mean that they require less patients overall, less patients to attain the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and concentrate a higher percentage of patients at and near to the MTD. We reanalyse some recently published studies in order to provide support to our contention that markedly better results could have been achieved had a design with memory been used instead of a memoryless design.

[1]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a low‐clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of lurtotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced leukemia , 2004, Cancer.

[2]  I. Okamoto,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of amrubicin, a synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, in patients with refractory or relapsed lung cancer , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[3]  K. Gelmon,et al.  A phase I study of AMD473 and docetaxel given once every 3 weeks in patients with advanced refractory cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group trial, IND 131. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Retrospective Analysis of Sequential Dose‐Finding Designs , 2005, Biometrics.

[5]  D. Faries,et al.  Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials. , 1994, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[6]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach. , 1996, Biometrics.

[7]  L V Rubinstein,et al.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Jeffrey R. Eisele,et al.  A Curve‐Free Method for Phase I Clinical Trials , 2000, Biometrics.

[9]  D. Frappaz,et al.  Dose finding and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase study of cisplatin combined with temozolomide in paediatric solid malignancies , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Ethan Reiner,et al.  Operating characteristics of the standard phase I clinical trial design , 1999 .

[11]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials , 1998, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  S. Goodman,et al.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  R. Porcher,et al.  Alternate designs for conduct and analysis of phase I cancer trials. , 2001, Blood.

[14]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.

[15]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  A phase I study of intraperitoneal topotecan in combination with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2005, European journal of cancer.