Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.

INTRODUCTION During SAE level 3 automated driving, the driver's role changes from active driver to fallback-ready driver. Drowsiness is one of the factors that may degrade driver's takeover performance. This study aimed to investigate effects of non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) to counter driver's drowsiness with a Level 3 system activated and to improve successive takeover performance in a critical situation. A special focus was placed on age-related differences in the effects. METHOD Participants of three age groups (younger, middle-aged, older) drove the Level 3 system implemented in a high-fidelity motion-based driving simulator for about 30 min under three experiment conditions: without NDRT, while watching a video clip, and while switching between watching a video clip and playing a game. The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and eyeblink duration measured driver drowsiness. At the end of the drive, the drivers had to take over control of the vehicle and manually change the lane to avoid a collision. Reaction time and steering angle variability were measured to evaluate the two aspects of driving performance. RESULTS For younger drivers, both single and multiple NDRT engagements countered the development of driver drowsiness during automated driving, and their takeover performance was equivalent to or better than their performance without NDRT engagement. For older drivers, NDRT engagement did not affect the development of drowsiness but degraded takeover performance especially under the multiple NDRT engagement condition. The results for middle-aged drivers fell at an intermediate level between those for younger and older drivers. Practical Applications: The present findings do not support general recommendations of NDRT engagement to counter drowsiness during automated driving. This study is especially relevant to the automotive industry's search for options that will ensure the safest interfaces between human drivers and automation systems.

[1]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[2]  Gary S. Robinson,et al.  Temporal Separation and Self-Rating of Alertness as Indicators of Driver Fatigue in Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Nadja Schömig,et al.  The Interaction Between Highly Automated Driving and the Development of Drowsiness , 2015 .

[4]  Jing Feng,et al.  Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Drowsiness detection using heart rate variability , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[6]  Motohiro Kimura,et al.  The auditory N1 amplitude for task-irrelevant probes reflects visual interest. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Riender Happee,et al.  Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  I Feinberg,et al.  Changes in sleep cycle patterns with age. , 1974, Journal of psychiatric research.

[9]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Drowsiness in Conditional Automation: Proneness, diagnosis and driving performance effects , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[10]  Frederik Naujoks,et al.  From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  D. Dinges,et al.  Catastrophes, sleep, and public policy: consensus report. , 1988, Sleep.

[12]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Transport and industrial safety, how are they affected by sleepiness and sleep restriction? , 2006, Sleep medicine reviews.

[13]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Tobias Vogelpohl,et al.  Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  Electrophysiological evaluation of attention in drivers and passengers: Toward an understanding of drivers’ attentional state in autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[16]  P. Caffier,et al.  Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[17]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Effect of Active and Passive Fatigue on Performance Using a Driving Simulator , 2008 .

[19]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  James A. Horne,et al.  Driver sleepiness—Comparisons between young and older men during a monotonous afternoon simulated drive , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[22]  Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  The Influence of Prolonged Conditionally Automated Driving on the Take-Over Ability of the Driver , 2017 .

[23]  A. Gazzaley,et al.  Attention and Ageing , 2014 .

[24]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Impaired alertness and performance driving home from the night shift: a driving simulator study , 2005, Journal of sleep research.

[25]  E. Bixler,et al.  Excessive daytime sleepiness in a general population sample: the role of sleep apnea, age, obesity, diabetes, and depression. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[26]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Automated Driving: The Potential of Non-driving-Related Tasks to Manage Driver Drowsiness , 2018 .

[28]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. , 1990, The International journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Wake Up and Take Over! The Effect of Fatigue on the Take-over Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[30]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Katsuya Matsunaga,et al.  Differences of drivers' reaction times according to age and mental workload. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Catherine Neubauer,et al.  The Effects of Cell Phone Use and Automation on Driver Performance and Subjective State in Simulated Driving , 2012 .

[33]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Distraction Becomes Engagement in Automated Driving , 2015 .