Genetic Improvement of U.S. Soybean in Maturity Groups II, III, and IV

Soybean improvement via plant breeding has been critical for the success of the crop. The objective of this study was to quantify genetic change in yield and other traits that occurred during the past 80 yr of North American soybean breeding in Maturity Groups (MGs) II, III, and IV. Historic sets of 60 MG II, 59 MG III, and 49 MG IV soybean cultivars, released from 1923 to 2008, were evaluated in field trials conducted in 17 U.S. states and one Canadian province during 2010 to 2011. Averaged over 27 MG II and MG IV and 26 MG III site-years of data, the estimated rates of yield improvement during the 80 yr were 23 kg ha–1 yr–1 for MGs II and III, and 20 kg ha–1 yr–1 for MG IV cultivars. However, a two-segment linear regression model provided a better fit to the data and indicated that the average current rate of genetic yield gain across MGs is 29 kg ha–1 yr–1. Modern cultivars yielded more than old cultivars in all environments, but particularly in high-yielding environments. New cultivars in the historic sets used in this study are shorter in height, mature later, lodge less, and have seeds with less protein and greater oil concentration. Given that on-farm soybean yields in the United States are also increasing at a rate of 29 kg ha–1 yr–1, it can be inferred that continual release of greater-yielding cultivars has been a substantive driver of the U.S. onfarm realized yield increases. K. Rincker, C. Fox, T. Cary, and B. Diers, Dep. of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; R. Nelson, USDA-ARS, Soybean/Maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research Unit, and Dep. of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; J.E. Specht and G. Graef, Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583; D. Sleper and G. Shannon, Division of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211; S. Cianzio, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 550011; S. Casteel, Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue, Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907; S. Conley and V. Davis, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706; P. Chen, Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701; C. Godsey, Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078; D. Holshouser, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech, Suffolk, VA 23437; G. Jiang, Dep. of Plant Sciences, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007; S. Kantartzi, Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901; W. Kenworthy, Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; C. Lee, Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546; R. Mian, USDA-ARS, and Dep. of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State Univ., Wooster, OH 44691; L. McHale, Dep. of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State Univ., Wooster, OH 44691; S. Naeve and J. Orf, Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; V. Poysa, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON N0R 1G0 Canada; W. Schapaugh, Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506; R. Uniatowski, Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716; D. Wang, Dep. of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. Received 7 Oct. 2013. *Corresponding author (bdiers@illinois.edu). Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion; BLUP, best linear unbiased predictor; MG, maturity group; PI, plant introduction; PVP, plant variety protection. Published in Crop Sci. 54:1419–1432 (2014). doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0665 © Crop Science Society of America | 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. Published April 28, 2015

[1]  T. Carter,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Soybean , 2016 .

[2]  Inna Gerlovina.  Small Sample Inference , 2016 .

[3]  Richard M. Heiberger,et al.  Data and Statistics , 2015 .

[4]  Paul D. Esker,et al.  Physiological and phenological responses of historical soybean cultivar releases to earlier planting , 2014 .

[5]  James E. Specht,et al.  Estimating Soybean Genetic Gain for Yield in the Northern United States—Influence of Cropping History , 2013 .

[6]  J. Foley,et al.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050 , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  W. Raun,et al.  Genetic Yield Potential Improvement of Semidwarf Winter Wheat in the Great Plains , 2013 .

[8]  James E. Specht,et al.  Genetic gain × management interactions in soybean: I. Planting date , 2013 .

[9]  Trevor W. Rife,et al.  Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing for Plant Breeding and Genetics , 2012 .

[10]  R. Nelson,et al.  Ozone Exposure Response for U.S. Soybean Cultivars: Linear Reductions in Photosynthetic Potential, Biomass, and Yield1[W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[11]  R. Pitman,et al.  Genetic Yield Improvement in Soft Red Winter Wheat in the Eastern United States from 1919 to 2009 , 2012 .

[12]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[13]  Donald N. Duvick,et al.  Long‐Term Selection in a Commercial Hybrid Maize Breeding Program , 2010 .

[14]  R. Bernardo.  Genomewide selection with minimal crossing in self-pollinated crops. , 2010 .

[15]  T. Sakurai,et al.  Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean , 2010, Nature.

[16]  Donna L. Mohr,et al.  Data and Statistics , 2010 .

[17]  P. Pedersen,et al.  Yield Improvement and Stability for Soybean Cultivars with Resistance to Heterodera Glycines Ichinohe , 2008 .

[18]  Richard F. Wilson,et al.  Soybean: Market Driven Research Needs , 2008 .

[19]  R. Reiter,et al.  Molecular Markers in a Commercial Breeding Program , 2007 .

[20]  L. Ziska,et al.  Predicting the impact of changing CO(2) on crop yields: some thoughts on food. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[21]  C. A. Strausbaugh,et al.  Seventy‐five Years of Breeding Dry Bean of the Western USA , 2007 .

[22]  S. Long,et al.  Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations , 2006, Science.

[23]  D. Posada,et al.  Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[24]  Joshua A. Udall,et al.  Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants , 2003 .

[25]  J. Araus,et al.  Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? , 2002, Annals of botany.

[26]  J. Wilcox.  Sixty Years of Improvement in Publicly Developed Elite Soybean Lines , 2001 .

[27]  B. English,et al.  Genetic progress in soybean of the U.S. Midsouth , 2001 .

[28]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[29]  J. Specht,et al.  Soybean yield potential: A genetic and physiological perspective , 1999 .

[30]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[31]  Elroy R. Cober,et al.  Fifty‐Eight Years of Genetic Improvement of Short‐Season Soybean Cultivars in Canada , 1997 .

[32]  K. Rosentrater,et al.  Soybean , 1995, Integrated Processing Technologies for Food and Agricultural By-Products.

[33]  C. Sneller.  Pedigree Analysis of Elite Soybean Lines , 1994 .

[34]  T. Carter,et al.  Genetic Base for North American Public Soybean Cultivars Released between 1947 and 1988 , 1994 .

[35]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Changes in Yield and Seed Growth Traits in Soybean Cultivars Released in the Southern USA from 1945 to 1983 , 1993 .

[36]  G. Kitagawa,et al.  Akaike Information Criterion Statistics , 1988 .

[37]  R. L. Bernard.  Origins and pedigrees of public soybean varieties in the United States and Canada , 1988 .

[38]  W. Fehr.  Principles of Cultivar Development: Theory and Technique , 1987 .

[39]  J. W. Burton,et al.  Quantitative genetics: results relevant to soybean breeding , 1987 .

[40]  J. Specht,et al.  Contribution of genetic technology to soybean productivity: retrospect and prospect , 1984 .

[41]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency in Crop Production , 1984 .

[42]  R. L. Bernard,et al.  Genetic Improvement of Soybeans in the Midwest1 , 1979 .

[43]  H. Boerma.  Comparison of Past and Recently Developed Soybean Cultivars in Maturity Groups VI, VII, and VIII1 , 1979 .

[44]  V. D. Luedders.  Genetic Improvement in Yield of Soybeans1 , 1977 .

[45]  W. Fehr,et al.  Stage of Development Descriptions for Soybeans, Glycine Max (L.) Merrill , 1971 .

[46]  K. W. Finlay,et al.  The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme , 1963 .

[47]  J. L. Cartter,et al.  Soybeans: Culture and Varieties. , 1949 .