Evaluation of a New Single-Parameter Volumetric Flow Cytometer (CyFlowgreen) for Enumeration of Absolute CD4+ T Lymphocytes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Thai Patients

ABSTRACT Use of the standard dual-platform flow cytometric method for determination of CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, which needs both a flow cytometer (FCM) and hematological analyzer, would inevitably lead to increased variability. The development of new single-platform (SP) FCMs that provide direct CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts for improved assay precision and accuracy have recently attracted attention. This study evaluated one of those systems, CyFlowgreen (Partec), a single-parameter SP volumetric FCM. The performance of CyFlowgreen was compared with those of two reference standard SP microbead-based technologies of the three-color TruCOUNT tube with the FACScan FCM and a two-color FACSCount system (Becton Dickinson Biosciences). Absolute CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts in 200 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive blood specimens were determined. Statistical analysis for correlation and agreement were performed. A high correlation of absolute CD4 counts was shown when those obtained with CyFlowgreen were compared with those obtained with the bead-based three-color TruCOUNT system (R2 = 0.96; mean bias, −69.1 cells/μl; 95% confidence interval [CI], −225.7 to +87.5 cells/μl) and the FACSCount system (R2 = 0.97; mean bias, −40.0 cells/μl; 95% CI, −165.1 to +85.1 cells/μl). The correlation of the CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts obtained by the two bead-based systems was high (R2 = 0.98). Interestingly, CyFlowgreen yielded CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts that were 21.8 and 7.2 cells/μl lower than those obtained with the TruCOUNT and the FACSCount systems, respectively, when CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were <250 CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts/μl range or 17.3 and 5.8 cells/μl less, respectively, when CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were <200 cells/μl. The single-parameter CyFlowgreen volumetric technology performed well in comparison with the performance of the standard SP bead-based FCM system. However, a multicenter comparative study is needed before this FCM machine is implemented in resource-limited settings.

[1]  Luc Kestens,et al.  Absolute CD4 T-Cell Counting in Resource-Poor Settings: Direct Volumetric Measurements Versus Bead-Based Clinical Flow Cytometry Instruments , 2005, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[2]  G. Janossy,et al.  New trends in affordable CD4 T-cell enumeration by flow cytometry in HIV/AIDS , 2003 .

[3]  W. Göhde,et al.  A New No-Lyse, No-Wash Flow-Cytometric Method for the Determination of CD4 T Cells in Blood Samples , 2003, Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy.

[4]  F. Mandy,et al.  Guidelines for performing single-platform absolute CD4+ T-cell determinations with CD45 gating for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[5]  G. Mazurek,et al.  Guidelines for performing single-platform absolute CD4+ T-cell determinations with CD45 gating for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus; Guidelines for using the quantiFERON-TB test for diagnosing latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection , 2003 .

[6]  McDougal Js,et al.  Guidelines for performing single-platform absolute CD4+ T-cell determinations with CD45 gating for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[7]  George Janossy,et al.  Affordable CD4+-T-Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry: CD45 Gating for Volumetric Analysis , 2002, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[8]  G. Janossy,et al.  Affordable CD4+ T cell counts by flow cytometry. II. The use of fixed whole blood in resource-poor settings. , 2001, Journal of immunological methods.

[9]  W. Göhde,et al.  The "vanishing counting bead" phenomenon: effect on absolute CD34+ cell counting in phosphate-buffered saline-diluted leukapheresis samples. , 2001, Cytometry.

[10]  D Barnett,et al.  Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis. , 2000, Cytometry.

[11]  George Janossy,et al.  Affordable CD4(+) T-cell counts on 'single-platform' flow cytometers I. Primary CD4 gating. , 2000 .

[12]  W. Göhde,et al.  Affordable CD4+ T‐cell counts on ‘single‐platform’ flow cytometers I. Primary CD4 gating , 2000, British journal of haematology.

[13]  B. Brando,et al.  Enumeration of Absolute Cell Counts Using Immunophenotypic Techniques , 2000, Current protocols in cytometry.

[14]  C. S. Scott,et al.  Microvolume fluorimetry for the determination of absolute CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte counts in patients with HIV: a comparative evaluation. , 1999, Clinical and laboratory haematology.

[15]  I. Storie,et al.  Absolute CD4+ T‐lymphocyte and CD34+ stem cell counts by single‐platform flow cytometry: the way forward , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[16]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Current Protocols In Cytometry , 1997 .

[17]  T. Denny,et al.  Evaluation of a method for counting absolute numbers of cells with a flow cytometer , 1997, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[18]  A Orfao,et al.  Performance evaluation of the FACSCount System: a dedicated system for clinical cellular analysis. , 1996, Cytometry.

[19]  N. Sizto,et al.  Volumetric capillary cytometry: a new method for absolute cell enumeration. , 1996, Cytometry.

[20]  C. Spino,et al.  Standardization of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts across laboratories: an evaluation of the Ortho CytoronAbsolute flow cytometry system on normal donors. , 1995, Cytometry.

[21]  T. Quinn,et al.  A manual bead assay for the determination of absolute CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals , 1995, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[22]  I. Lisse,et al.  Determination of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes with the cytosphere assay: a comparative study with flow cytometry and the immunoalkaline phosphatase method. , 1995, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[23]  J. Nicholson,et al.  Evaluation of alternative CD4 technologies for the enumeration of CD4 lymphocytes. , 1994, Journal of immunological methods.

[24]  J. Kagan,et al.  Assessment of the effects of instrumentation, monoclonal antibody, and fluorochrome on flow cytometric immunophenotyping: a report based on 2 years of the NIAID DAIDS flow cytometry quality assessment program. , 1993, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[25]  M. Wansbrough-Jones,et al.  Effect of type of haematology analyser on CD4 count , 1992, The Lancet.

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[27]  D K Glencross,et al.  CD4+ T cell enumeration in HIV infection with limited resources. , 1999, Journal of immunological methods.

[28]  J. Malone,et al.  Sources of variability in repeated T-helper lymphocyte counts from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: total lymphocyte count fluctuations and diurnal cycle are important. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.