Modeling and Predicting Biological Performance of Contact Stabilization Process Using Artificial Neural Networks

In this paper, the microfauna distribution data of a contact stabilization process were used in a neural network system to model and predict the biological activity of the effluent. Five uncorrelated components of the microfauna were used as the artificial neural network model input to predict the dehydrogenase activity of the effluent (DAE) using back-propagation and general regression algorithms. The models’ optimum architectures were determined for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model by varying the number of hidden layers, hidden transfer functions, test set size percentages, and initial weights. Comparison of the two model prediction results showed that the genetic general regression neural network model demonstrated the ability to calibrate the multicomponent microfauna, and yielded reliable DAE close to that resulting from direct experimentation, and thus was judged superior to BPNN models.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[2]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[3]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  A general regression neural network , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  C. Curds,et al.  The effect of ciliated protozoa on the fate of Escherichia coli in the activated-sludge process , 1969 .

[5]  D. F. Specht,et al.  Experience with adaptive probabilistic neural networks and adaptive general regression neural networks , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[6]  Philip D. Wasserman,et al.  Advanced methods in neural computing , 1993, VNR computer library.

[7]  Yoon-Seok Timothy Hong,et al.  Analysis of a municipal wastewater treatment plant using a neural network-based pattern analysis. , 2003, Water research.

[8]  M. Hamoda,et al.  Performance-Based Characterization of a Contact Stabilization Process for Slaughterhouse Wastewater , 2003, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[9]  James V. Hansen,et al.  Learning experiments with genetic optimization of a generalized regression neural network , 1996, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  L. Meeker,et al.  Protozoa and Metazoa as Indicators of Effluent Quality in Rotating Biological Contactors , 1988 .

[11]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  The general regression neural network - Rediscovered , 1993, Neural Networks.

[12]  M Bongards,et al.  Improving the efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant by fuzzy control and neural network. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  P. Werbos,et al.  Beyond Regression : "New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences , 1974 .

[14]  A. Spagni,et al.  Soft sensors for control of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewaters by neural networks. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Michael Häck,et al.  Estimation of wastewater process parameters using neural networks , 1996 .

[16]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Advanced algorithms for neural networks: a C++ sourcebook , 1995 .

[17]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[18]  P. Madoni,et al.  Toxic effect of heavy metals on the activated sludge protozoan community , 1996 .

[19]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Rough set-based hybrid fuzzy-neural controller design for industrial wastewater treatment. , 2003, Water research.

[20]  C. Curds THE FLOCCULATION OF SUSPENDED MATTER BY PARAMECIUM CAUDATUM. , 1963, Journal of general microbiology.

[21]  Ming Rao,et al.  An on-line wastewater quality predication system based on a time-delay neural network , 1998 .

[22]  Martin Cote,et al.  Dynamic modelling of the activated sludge process: Improving prediction using neural networks , 1995 .