Antecedents and consequents of a mobile website’s interactivity

The value proposition of mobile technology for education is expected to grow as forecasts speak of mobile internet users exceeding desktop internet users by 2014. A key concern for higher education administrators will be how to implement a mobile website that attracts and retains students in its use. To answer this question, a scenario-based study of 288 USA college students was conducted involving two wireframes of a mobile website design varying only in its degree of interactivity. A PLS-based data analysis offered support for the positive effects of interactivity on the perceived usefulness, ease of use, and enjoyment of the university’s mobile website, which in turn positively influenced their intention to use it. The measurement model offered high explanatory power (47% of the variance in the behavioral intention to use the university’s mobile website was explained by its three antecedents). Implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.

[1]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[2]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Measuring perceived interactivity of mobile advertisements , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Susan Bull,et al.  A mobile learning organiser for university students , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[4]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[5]  Chien Chou,et al.  Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[8]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Premium rate culture: the new business of mobile interactivity , 2007, New Media Soc..

[9]  David C. Yen,et al.  Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Pirkko Walden,et al.  Factors Affecting Consumer Adoption Decisions and Intents in Mobile Commerce: Empirical Insights , 2003, Bled eConference.

[12]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Hedonic and Utilitarian Outcomes of Website Social Presence: The Impacts of Framing and Time Constraints , 2008 .

[13]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVATIONS FOR ONLINE RETAIL SHOPPING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[14]  Hee-Woong Kim,et al.  A balanced thinking-feelings model of information systems continuance , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[16]  N. McNamara,et al.  Defining usability: quality of use or quality of experience? , 2005, IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005..

[17]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Defining Interactivity , 2000, New Media Soc..

[18]  Mark Tremayne,et al.  Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: a media learning experiment , 2008, New Media Soc..

[19]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites , 1998 .

[20]  R. Bagozzi.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment , 1981 .

[21]  Seungwan Ryu,et al.  Implementation of Next Generation Mobile Service: The Context-Aware Follow-Me Service , 2006, International Conference on Computational Science.

[22]  Jonathan Trevor,et al.  Exploiting space and location as a design framework for interactive mobile systems , 2000, TCHI.

[23]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Wendy Macias,et al.  A Beginning Look at the Effects of Interactivity, Product Involvement and Web Experience on Comprehension: Brand Web Sites as Interactive Advertising , 2003 .

[25]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[26]  Rudy Bretz,et al.  Media for Interactive Communication , 1983 .

[27]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  DAVID KIRSH,et al.  Interactivity and multimedia interfaces , 1997 .

[29]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  A Meta-Analytical Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies , 2011 .

[33]  Giasemi N. Vavoula,et al.  Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning , 2004 .

[34]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Toward the Study of Aesthetics in Information Technology , 2004, ICIS.

[35]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Interactive to me – interactive to you? A study of use and appreciation of interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites , 2011, New Media Soc..

[36]  Nick Bontis,et al.  The impact of distractions on the usability and intention to use mobile devices for wireless data services , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Shannon D. Smith,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2009—Key Findings , 2010 .

[38]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  A research agenda for mobile usability , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[39]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[40]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[42]  Charles Steinfield,et al.  The development of location based services in mobile commerce , 2004 .

[43]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[44]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[45]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Russell Richards,et al.  Users, interactivity and generation , 2006, New Media Soc..

[47]  Nick Bontis,et al.  The Impact of Distractions on the Usability and the Adoption of Mobile Devices for Wireless Data Services , 2007, ECIS.

[48]  J. Leckenby,et al.  The role of perceived interactivity in interactive ad processing , 2000 .

[49]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  Web Aesthetics and Usability: An Empirical Study of the Effects of White Space , 2012, Int. J. E Bus. Res..

[50]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The Role of Affect in is Research: A Critical Survey and a Research Model, in Hci and Mis (I): Foundations , 2006 .

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations , 2007 .

[52]  B. Szuprowicz.  Interactive Communications: New Technologies and Future Directions , 1995 .

[53]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  An empirical investigation of color temperature and gender effects on web aesthetics , 2008 .

[54]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[56]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[57]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  JungKun Park,et al.  Role of perceived interactivity in intended loyalty for mobile cell-phones , 2008 .

[59]  Grace J. Johnson,et al.  Interactivity and its Facets Revisited: Theory and Empirical Test , 2006 .

[60]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Microblogging - more than fun? , 2008 .

[61]  ThaeMin Lee,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PERCEPTIONS OF INTERACTIVITY ON CUSTOMER TRUST AND TRANSACTION INTENTIONS IN MOBILE COMMERCE , 2005 .

[62]  De Liu,et al.  The Effects of Trust and Enjoyment on Intention to Play Online Games , 2007 .

[63]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[64]  Dongyoung Sohn,et al.  Anatomy of interaction experience: Distinguishing sensory, semantic, and behavioral dimensions of interactivity , 2011, New Media Soc..

[65]  Chien Chou,et al.  The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: Students' perceptions, uses, and evaluations , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Environmental Detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.

[67]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video , 1986 .

[68]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[69]  Thomas Finley,et al.  (Perceived) interactivity: does interactivity increase enjoyment and creative identity in artistic spaces? , 2009, CHI.

[70]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Smart TV: are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean Smart TV , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[71]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Beginning SAP R/3 Implementation at Geneva Pharmaceuticals , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Oliver Quiring,et al.  What do users associate with ‘interactivity’? , 2009, New Media Soc..

[73]  Sally J. McMillan.  A four-part model of cyber-interactivity , 2002, New Media Soc..

[74]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Assessment of a Web-Based Learning Game in an Information Systems Course , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[76]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments , 2007, Interact. Comput..