‘Saving the appearances’, , is a slogan that, in its time, stood or was made to stand for many different methodological positions in many different branches of ancient natural science. It is not my aim, in this paper, to attempt to tackle the subject as a whole. I shall concentrate on just one inquiry, astronomy. Nor, with astronomy, can I do justice to all the complexities of what was certainly one of the central methodological issues, if not the central issue, in the history of ancient theoretical astronomy. I have a quite limited aim, to examine the foundations, and test the applicability, of a widespread and influential line of interpretation of ancient Greek astronomy according to which it was essentially, or at least predominantly, what we may call ‘instrumentalist’ in character—that is, broadly speaking, that Greek astronomical theories were devices or fictions put forward purely for the sake of calculations with no claims to correspond with physical reality.
[1]
S. Sambursky.
Plato, Proclus, and the Limitations of Science
,
2008
.
[2]
John Louis Emil Dreyer,et al.
History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler
,
2007,
Nature.
[3]
E. J. Dijksterhuis,et al.
The Mechanization of the World Picture
,
1962
.
[4]
ca. Proclus,et al.
In Platonis Timaeum commentaria
,
1965
.
[5]
Bernard R. Goldstein,et al.
The Arabic Version of Ptolemy's Planetary Hypotheses
,
1967
.
[6]
L. Wright.
The astronomy of Eudoxus: Geometry or physics?
,
1973
.
[7]
P. Duhem,et al.
To save the Phenomena
,
1970
.