A benchmark study for glacial isostatic adjustment codes

The study of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) is gaining an increasingly im-portant role within the geophysical community. Understanding the response of the Earth to loading is crucial in various contexts, ranging from the the interpretation of modern satellite geodetic measurements (e. g. GRACE and GOCE) to the projections of future sea level trends in response to climate change. Modern modeling approaches to GIA are based on various techniques that range from purely analytical formulations to fully numerical methods. Despite various teams independently investigating GIA, we do not have a suitably large set of explicitly validated numerical results through which they may be validated; a community benchmark data set would clearly be valuable. Following the example of the mantle convection community, here we present, for the first time, the results of a benchmark study of codes designed to model GIA. The approaches benchmarked are based on significantly different codes and different techniques. This effort is performed within the Working Group 4 (WG4) of the ESF COST Action ES0701 “Improved constraints on models of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment”. Our aims are: i) testing the codes currently in use by the various teams, ii) establish a sufficiently large set of agreed results, iii) correct possible systematic errors embedded in the various physical formulations or computer implementations, and iv) facilitate the dissemination of numerical tools for surface loading studies to the community and to young scientists. The test computations are mainly based on models with spherical symmetry and Maxwell rheology and include inputs from various different methods and solution techniques: viscoelastic normal modes, spectral finite–elements and finite–elements. The tests involve the loading and tidal Love numbers and their relaxation spectra, the deformation and gravity variations driven by surface loads characterized by simple geometry and time–history, and the rotational fluctuations in response to glacial unloading. In spite of the significant differences in the numerical methods employed, the test computations show a satisfactory agreement between the results provided by the participants. Most of the existing misfits have been addressed during the preparation of the manuscript, some others are currently the subject of analysis within the WG4 community.

[1]  Hansheng Wang,et al.  Effects of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness and mantle viscosity on glacially induced surface motion on a spherical, self-gravitating Maxwell Earth , 2006 .

[2]  D. Widder The inversion of the Laplace integral and the related moment problem , 1934 .

[3]  Z. Martinec Propagator-matrix Technique for the Viscoelastic Response of a Multi-layered Sphere to Surface Toroidal Traction , 2007 .

[4]  I. Sasgen,et al.  Temporal Gravity Variations near Shrinking Vatnajökull Ice Cap, Iceland , 2009 .

[5]  G. Spada,et al.  Postglacial rebound in a non‐Newtonian spherical Earth , 2000 .

[6]  Detlef Wolf,et al.  Compressible viscoelasticity: stability of solutions for homogeneous plane-Earth models , 2003 .

[7]  D. Yuen,et al.  Postglacial rebound with a non-Newtonian upper mantle and a Newtonian lower mantle rheology , 1992 .

[8]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  GRACE Gravity Data Constrain Ancient Ice Geometries and Continental Dynamics over Laurentia , 2007, Science.

[9]  G. Spada,et al.  Analytical visco-elastic relaxation models , 1996 .

[10]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[11]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Some analytical solutions for the viscoelastic gravitational relaxation of a two-layer non-self-gravitating incompressible spherical earth , 1996 .

[12]  W. Wal,et al.  Postglacial sealevels on a spherical, self-gravitating viscoelastic earth: effects of lateral viscosity variations in the upper mantle on the inference of viscosity contrasts in the lower mantle , 2003 .

[13]  Hansheng Wang,et al.  Optimal locations for GPS measurements in North America and northern Europe for constraining Glacial Isostatic Adjustment , 2010 .

[14]  R. Sabadini,et al.  The compressional and compositional stratifications in Maxwell earth models: the gravitational overturning and the long-period tangential flux , 2010 .

[15]  W. Peltier,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment and Earth rotation: Refined constraints on the viscosity of the deepest mantle , 1996 .

[16]  On Postglacial Sea Level , 2007 .

[17]  W. R. Peltier,et al.  The LAGEOS constraint on deep mantle viscosity: Results from a new normal mode method for the inversion of viscoelastic relaxation spectra , 1985 .

[18]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  Glacial Isostatic Adjustment over Antarctica from combined ICESat and GRACE satellite data , 2009 .

[19]  D. Yuen,et al.  Effects on post-glacial rebound from the hard rheology in the transition zone , 1992 .

[20]  W. Peltier The impulse response of a Maxwell Earth , 1974 .

[21]  Archie Paulson,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Inference of mantle viscosity from GRACE and relative sea level data , 2007 .

[22]  D. Yuen,et al.  Viscosity stratification of the lower mantle as inferred by the j2 observation. , 1985 .

[23]  Charles A. Williams,et al.  A rheologically layered three‐dimensional model of the San Andreas Fault in central and southern California , 1991 .

[24]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Using commercial finite element packages for the study of earth deformations, sea levels and the state of stress , 2004 .

[25]  L. Boschi,et al.  Using the Post-Widder formula to compute the Earth's viscoelastic Love numbers , 2006 .

[26]  J. Wahr,et al.  Post‐Glacial Rebound Analysis for a Rotating Earth , 2013 .

[27]  G. Spada Changes in the Earth inertia tensor: The role of boundary conditions at the core‐mantle interface , 1995 .

[28]  W. Peltier Chapter 4 Global glacial isostatic adjustment and modern instrumental records of relative sea level history , 2001 .

[29]  C. Ferrari,et al.  Glacier shrinkage and modeled uplift of the Alps , 2006 .

[30]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Deformation of an incompressible viscoelastic flat earth with powerlaw creep: a finite element approach , 1992 .

[31]  K. Fleming,et al.  Geoid displacement about Greenland resulting from past and present‐day mass changes in the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2004 .

[32]  J. Wünsch,et al.  A Reanalysis and Reinterpretation of Geodetic and Geological Evidence of Glacial-Isostatic Adjustment in the Churchill Region, Hudson Bay , 2006 .

[33]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Viscoelastic versus viscous deformation and the advection of pre-stress , 1992 .

[34]  W. Peltier,et al.  ICE-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of po , 1991 .

[35]  Giorgio Spada,et al.  ALMA, a Fortran program for computing the viscoelastic Love numbers of a spherically symmetric planet , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[36]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Effects of mantle flow law stress exponent on postglacial induced surface motion and gravity in Laurentia , 2002 .

[37]  G. Spada,et al.  Shallow upper mantle rheology and secular ice sheet fluctuations , 2011 .

[38]  V. Barletta,et al.  Investigating superswells and sea level changes caused by superplumes via normal mode relaxation theory , 2006 .

[39]  R. Gross,et al.  An estimate of motion between the spin axis and the hotspots over the past century , 2004 .

[40]  M. Nakada Polar wander caused by the Quaternary glacial cycles and fluid Love number , 2002 .

[41]  W. Peltier,et al.  Viscous gravitational relaxation , 1982 .

[42]  Bifrost GPS measurements to constrain geodynamic processes in Fennoscandia , 1996 .

[43]  D. Yuen,et al.  Polar wandering and the forced responses of a rotating, multilayered, viscoelastic planet , 1981 .

[44]  G. Spada,et al.  Mantle viscosity from Monte Carlo inversion of very long baseline interferometry data , 2001 .

[45]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  The Earth's Variable Rotation: Geophysical Causes and Consequences , 1980 .

[46]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Regional Perturbations in a Global Background Model of Glacial Isostasy , 2008 .

[47]  W. Peltier,et al.  Pleistocene deglaciation and the Earth's rotation: a new analysis , 1984 .

[48]  R. Riva,et al.  Approximation method for high-degree harmonics in normal mode modelling , 2002 .

[49]  Z. Martinec,et al.  An Estimate of Global Mean Sea-level Rise Inferred from Tide-gauge Measurements Using Glacial-isostatic Models Consistent with the Relative Sea-level Record , 2007 .

[50]  M. Greff-Lefftz Secular variation of the geocenter , 2000 .

[51]  W. Peltier,et al.  On the origins of Earth rotation anomalies: New insights on the basis of both “paleogeodetic” data and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data , 2009 .

[52]  M. Nakada Polar wander of the Earth associated with the Quaternary glacial cycle on a convecting mantle , 2009 .

[53]  G. Spada,et al.  Implementation of the Complete Sea Level Equation in a 3D Finite Elements Scheme: A Validation Study , 2012 .

[54]  G. Spada,et al.  Polar wandering of a dynamic earth , 1993 .

[55]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Constraints on shallow low-viscosity zones in Northern Europe from future GOCE gravity data , 2009 .

[56]  D. Yuen,et al.  Eustatic sea level fluctuations induced by polar wander , 1990, Nature.

[57]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Ice‐age cycles: Earth's rotation instabilities and sea‐level changes , 1997 .

[58]  Giorgio Spada,et al.  SELEN: A Fortran 90 program for solving the "sea-level equation" , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[59]  Lapo Boschi,et al.  MODELING EARTH'S POST-GLACIAL REBOUND , 2004 .

[60]  B. Vermeersen,et al.  Global Dynamics of the Earth , 2004 .

[61]  Klaus Regenauer-Lieb,et al.  Towards a Self Consistent Plate Mantle Model that Includes Elasticity: Simple Benchmarks and Application to Basic Modes of Convection , 2005 .

[62]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Significance of the fundamental mantle rotational relaxation mode in polar wander simulations , 1996 .

[63]  V. Barletta,et al.  A comparative analysis of the solutions for a Maxwell Earth: the role of the advection and buoyancy force , 2009 .

[64]  Björn Lund,et al.  A comparison between two solution techniques to solve the equations of glacially induced deformation of an elastic Earth , 2008 .

[65]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Spectral finite element approach to postseismic deformation in a viscoelastic self-gravitating spherical Earth , 2009 .

[66]  Walter Munk,et al.  The rotation of the earth , 1960 .

[67]  G. Blewitt Self‐consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth , 2003 .

[68]  G. S. Miller,et al.  Development of recurrent coastal plume in Lake Michigan observed for first time , 1996 .

[69]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Mode coupling in a viscoelastic self-gravitating spherical earth induced by axisymmetric loads and lateral viscosity variations , 2002 .

[70]  X.,et al.  Postglacial sea-level change on a rotating Earth : first results from a gravitationally self-consistent sea-level equation , 2022 .

[71]  J. Wahr,et al.  The viscoelastic relaxation of a realistically stratified earth, and a further analysis of postglacial rebound , 1995 .

[72]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Models of Active Glacial Isostasy Roofing Warm Subduction: Case of the South Patagonian Ice Field , 2007 .

[73]  M. Greff-Lefftz,et al.  Degree-one deformations of the Earth , 2000 .

[74]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Spectral-finite element approach to viscoelastic relaxation in a spherical compressible Earth: application to GIA modelling , 2011 .

[75]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Some effects of lateral heterogeneities in the upper mantle on postglacial land uplift close to continental margins , 1997 .

[76]  W. Peltier,et al.  Pleistocene deglaciation and the Earth's rotation: implications for mantle viscosity , 1981 .

[77]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Constraints on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment from GOCE and Sea Level Data , 2009 .

[78]  Carl W. Gable,et al.  3D convection at infinite Prandtl number in Cartesian geometry — a benchmark comparison , 1994 .

[79]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  Comparison of sequence accelerators forthe Gaver method of numerical Laplace transform inversion , 2004 .

[80]  D. V. Widder,et al.  The Laplace Transform , 1943 .

[81]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Glacial rebound and plate spreading: Results from the first countrywide GPS observations in Iceland , 2009 .

[82]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  Changes in rotation induced by Pleistocene ice masses with stratified analytical Earth models , 1997 .

[83]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Improved Constraints on Models of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment: A Review of the Contribution of Ground-Based Geodetic Observations , 2010 .

[84]  L. Vermeersen,et al.  A new class of stratified viscoelastic models by analytical techniques , 1997 .

[85]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Glacial isostasy and plate motion , 2008 .

[86]  Hansheng Wang,et al.  Effects of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness and mantle viscosity on glacially induced relative sea levels and long wavelength gravity field in a spherical, self-gravitating Maxwell Earth , 2006 .

[87]  W. Peltier,et al.  Pleistocene deglaciation and the global gravity field , 1989 .

[88]  Louis Moresi,et al.  A benchmark study on mantle convection in a 3‐D spherical shell using CitcomS , 2008 .

[89]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Postglacial sea-level change on a rotating Earth , 1998 .

[90]  David M. Smith,et al.  Efficient multiple-precision evaluation of elementary functions , 1989 .

[91]  Manfred Koch,et al.  A benchmark comparison for mantle convection codes , 1989 .

[92]  L. Cathles,et al.  The Viscosity of the Earth's Mantle , 1975 .

[93]  S. M. Nakiboglu,et al.  Deglaciation effects on the rotation of the Earth , 1980 .

[94]  Björn Lund,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment: Implications for glacially induced faulting and nuclear waste repositories , 2009 .

[95]  Andrea Bordoni,et al.  Clearing observed PGR in GRACE data aimed at global viscosity inversion: Weighted Mass Trends technique , 2009 .

[96]  Z. Martinec Spectral–finite element approach to three‐dimensional viscoelastic relaxation in a spherical earth , 2000 .

[97]  D. Yuen,et al.  Viscosity of the lower mantle as inferred from rotational data , 1982 .

[98]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Contribution of glacial-isostatic adjustment to the geocenter motion , 2011 .

[99]  A. Paulson,et al.  The rotational stability of an ice-age earth , 2005 .

[100]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment on 3‐D Earth models: a finite‐volume formulation , 2005 .

[101]  G. Spada,et al.  Compressible rotational deformation , 1996 .

[102]  P. Whitehouse Glacial isostatic adjustment and sea-level change : state of the art report. , 2009 .

[103]  R. Sabadini Applications of Normal Mode Relaxation Theory to Solid Earth Geophysics , 2004 .

[104]  G. Spada,et al.  Glacio–isostatic Adjustment in the Po Plain and in the Northern Adriatic Region , 2009 .

[105]  W. Farrell Deformation of the Earth by surface loads , 1972 .

[106]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Time-domain approach to linearized rotational response of a three-dimensional viscoelastic earth model induced by glacial-isostatic adjustment: I. Inertia-tensor perturbations , 2005 .