Assessment of dependence in daily activities combined with a self-rating of difficulty.

OBJECTIVE To study the information gained by extending a well-established instrument of dependence/independence in activities of daily living with a self-rating of difficulty, and to illustrate the relevance and usefulness of this combined approach with cross-national data. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS Cross-sectional survey study data collected with 1918 very old persons in 5 European countries. METHODS The "ADL staircase assessment" of dependence/independence, extended with a self-rating of difficulty, was administered at home visits. Data distribution in the 5 national samples and analyses with or without use of the self-rating data were carried out. RESULTS High proportions of the subjects were independent in most of the activities assessed, while substantial proportions reported difficulties. Considerable differences were identified among the national samples. In personal activities of daily living, those assessed as independent varied from 87% to 100%, while the proportion of those who rated themselves as "independent without difficulty" ranged from 53% to 98%. In instrumental activities, 33-91% were assessed as independent, while the proportions of "independent without difficulty" ranged from 24% to 77%. Analysis results differed as to whether or not self-ratings of difficulty were used. CONCLUSION The combined approach to data collection gave a diversified, information-rich picture. The assessment used is easy to administer and can be used in practice contexts in different countries.

[1]  J C Grip,et al.  Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Julie Robison,et al.  Difficulty and Dependence: Two Components of the Disability Continuum among Community-Living Older Persons , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Alternative data treatment principles for categorical ADL data , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[4]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. , 2007, The Gerontologist.

[5]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living , 1969 .

[6]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[7]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. , 2007, The Gerontologist.

[8]  W. Spector,et al.  The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[9]  S. Katz Studies of illness in the aged , 1963 .

[10]  A M Jette,et al.  How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[12]  U. Sonn,et al.  Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  W. Spector,et al.  Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  W. Fisher,et al.  Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: I. Exploring unidimensionality. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  B. Spillman Changes in elderly disability rates and the implications for health care utilization and cost. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[16]  B. Wright,et al.  Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: a study of instrumental structures. , 1998, Stroke.

[17]  U. Sonn,et al.  Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[18]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: lessons from the ENABLE-AGE project , 2004, European journal of ageing.

[19]  On Scaling Methodology and Environmental Influences in Disability Assessments: The Cumulative Structure of Personal and Instrumental ADL among Older Adults in a Swedish Rural District , 1997 .

[20]  A Agresti,et al.  A survey of models for repeated ordered categorical response data. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  D. Wolf,et al.  Perspectives on the recent decline in disability at older ages. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[22]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[23]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing Enabler , 2005, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[24]  Carol Jagger,et al.  Determining health expectancies. , 2002 .

[25]  E. Kua,et al.  Item response bias was present in instrumental activity of daily living scale in Asian older adults. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  U. Sonn,et al.  Activities of daily living studied longitudinally between 70 and 76 years of age. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  Environmental influences on the cumulative structure of instrumental ADL: an example in osteoporosis patients in a Swedish rural district , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  Svend Kreiner,et al.  Functional ability scales for the elderly: A validation study , 1996 .

[29]  E. Svensson Analysis of systematic and random differences between paired ordinal categorical data , 1995 .