Keeping Up with the Neighbors: Social Interaction in a Market Economy

We consider a world in which individuals have private endowments and trade in markets while their utility is negatively affected by the consumption of their neighbors. Our interest is in understanding how the social structure of comparisons, taken together with the familiar fundamentals of the economy (endowments, technology, and preferences), shapes equilibrium prices, allocations, and welfare. We show that equilibrium prices and consumption are a function of a single network statistic: centrality. An individual's "centrality" is given by the weighted sum of paths of different lengths to all others in a social network. In particular, prices are proportional to the sum of centralities, and an individual's consumption depends on how central she is relative to others in the network. Inequalities in wealth and connections reinforce each other in markets: A transfer of resources from less to more central agents raises prices. As segregated communities become integrated, the poor lose while the rich gain in utility! (JEL: D5, D6, D85) (c) 2010 by the European Economic Association.

[1]  Hi-Lin Tan.  Prices in Networks , 2006 .

[2]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer.  Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being , 2004 .

[3]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[4]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[5]  T. Veblen.  The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1901 .

[6]  R. Easterlin.  Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence , 1974 .

[7]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Aspirations, Segregation, and Occupational Choice , 2010 .

[8]  R. Nesse.  Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess , 2001 .

[9]  H. Crès.  Symmetric Smooth Consumption Externalities , 1996 .

[10]  Giulio Zanella,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions and Endogenous Memberships , 2007 .

[11]  J. Montgomery.  Social Networks and Labor-Market Outcomes: Toward an Economic Analysis , 1991 .

[12]  H. Crès,et al.  Externalities, internalization and fluctuations , 1997 .

[13]  K. Arrow,et al.  *Conspicuous Consumption, Inconspicuous Leisure , 2009 .

[14]  B. Frey,et al.  What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Camille Roth,et al.  Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks by Sanjeev Goyal , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[16]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  R. Layard.  Happiness: Lessons from a New Science , 2005 .

[18]  A. Kapteyn,et al.  The Own and Social Effects of an Unexpected Income Shock: Evidence from the Dutch Postcode Lottery , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew B. Abel,et al.  Asset Prices Under Habit Formation and Catching Up with the Joneses , 1990 .

[20]  E. Hopkins,et al.  Running to Keep in the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status , 2002 .

[21]  Peter Funk,et al.  Status Effects and Negative Utility Growth , 2001 .

[22]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Trading in Networks: A Normal Form Game Experiment , 2009 .

[23]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Social Decision Theory: Choosing within and between Groups , 2012 .

[24]  Andrew J. Oswald,et al.  The Macroeconomics of Happiness , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[25]  J. Duesenberry,et al.  Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior , 1950 .

[26]  Francis Bloch,et al.  Pricing in networks , 2008 .

[27]  Arthur J. Robson,et al.  Status, the Distribution of Wealth, Private and Social Attitudes to Risk , 1992 .

[28]  Andrea Galeotti,et al.  Consumers Networks and Search Equilibria , 2004 .

[29]  R. Kranton,et al.  A Theory of Buyer-Seller Networks , 2001 .

[30]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .