Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets
暂无分享,去创建一个
Stephen J. Wright | Julie C. Mitchell | Anthony Gitter | Huikun Zhang | Spencer S Ericksen | Ching-Pei Lee | Gene E Ananiev | Nathan Wlodarchak | Peng Yu | Julie C Mitchell | Stephen J Wright | F Michael Hoffmann | Scott A Wildman | Michael A Newton | Spencer S. Ericksen | M. Newton | Ching-pei Lee | A. Gitter | Huikun Zhang | G. Ananiev | N. Wlodarchak | F. Hoffmann | S. Wildman
[1] Juho Rousu,et al. Computational-experimental approach to drug-target interaction mapping: A case study on kinase inhibitors , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[2] David Rogers,et al. Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[3] Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al. k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.
[4] Hanna Geppert,et al. Current Trends in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening: Molecular Representations, Data Mining Methods, New Application Areas, and Performance Evaluation , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[5] P. Clemons,et al. Chemogenomic data analysis: prediction of small-molecule targets and the advent of biological fingerprint. , 2007, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[6] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[7] Stephen J. Wright,et al. PMU Placement for Line Outage Identification via Multinomial Logistic Regression , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.
[8] Matthieu Schapira,et al. Identification of small molecule inhibitors that block the Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry kinase ROP18. , 2016, ACS infectious diseases.
[9] Gaël Varoquaux,et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[10] Stephen J. Capuzzi,et al. Progress towards a public chemogenomic set for protein kinases and a call for contributions , 2017, bioRxiv.
[11] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[12] Anne Mai Wassermann,et al. Experimental Design Strategy: Weak Reinforcement Leads to Increased Hit Rates and Enhanced Chemical Diversity , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[13] A. Bender,et al. Analysis of Iterative Screening with Stepwise Compound Selection Based on Novartis In-house HTS Data. , 2016, ACS chemical biology.
[14] Roman Garnett,et al. Introducing the ‘active search’ method for iterative virtual screening , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[15] Chang Liu,et al. Predicting Drug–Target Interactions Using Probabilistic Matrix Factorization , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[16] Trevor Hastie,et al. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.
[17] Yuan Wang,et al. Using Information from Historical High-Throughput Screens to Predict Active Compounds , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[18] Anne Mai Wassermann,et al. Ligand Prediction for Orphan Targets Using Support Vector Machines and Various Target-Ligand Kernels Is Dominated by Nearest Neighbor Effects , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[19] Gerard J P van Westen,et al. Drug Discovery Maps, a Machine Learning Model That Visualizes and Predicts Kinome–Inhibitor Interaction Landscapes , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Nicole E. Bodycombe,et al. Connecting Small Molecules with Similar Assay Performance Profiles Leads to New Biological Hypotheses , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[21] Anne Mai Wassermann,et al. Public Domain HTS Fingerprints: Design and Evaluation of Compound Bioactivity Profiles from PubChem's Bioassay Repository , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[22] G. Schneider,et al. Active learning for computational chemogenomics. , 2017, Future medicinal chemistry.
[23] G. Bemis,et al. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] P. Petrone,et al. Aggregated Compound Biological Signatures Facilitate Phenotypic Drug Discovery and Target Elucidation. , 2016, ACS chemical biology.
[25] Huikun Zhang,et al. Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] J. Bajorath,et al. Recent Advances in Scaffold Hopping. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[27] E. Lionta,et al. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: Principles, Applications and Recent Advances , 2014, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[28] Peter S. Kutchukian,et al. Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity. , 2012, ACS chemical biology.
[29] Y. Martin,et al. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[30] Andreas Bender,et al. Discovering Highly Potent Molecules from an Initial Set of Inactives Using Iterative Screening , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] T. Willson,et al. Seeding Collaborations to Advance Kinase Science with the GSK Published Kinase Inhibitor Set (PKIS) , 2014, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[32] Michael J. Keiser,et al. Predicted Biological Activity of Purchasable Chemical Space , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[33] John P. Overington,et al. Comprehensive characterization of the Published Kinase Inhibitor Set , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.
[34] Andreas Bender,et al. Data-Driven Derivation of an "Informer Compound Set" for Improved Selection of Active Compounds in High-Throughput Screening , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[35] M. Yuan,et al. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .
[36] Christin Rakers,et al. Chemogenomic Active Learning's Domain of Applicability on Small, Sparse qHTS Matrices: A Study Using Cytochrome P450 and Nuclear Hormone Receptor Families , 2018, ChemMedChem.
[37] Anthony Nicholls,et al. What do we know and when do we know it? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[38] M. Stahl,et al. Scaffold hopping. , 2004, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[39] Edward W. Lowe,et al. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery , 2014, Pharmacological Reviews.
[40] Robin Taylor,et al. Simulation Analysis of Experimental Design Strategies for Screening Random Compounds as Potential New Drugs and Agrochemicals , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[41] D. Drewry,et al. In Silico Screen and Structural Analysis Identifies Bacterial Kinase Inhibitors which Act with β-Lactams To Inhibit Mycobacterial Growth. , 2018, Molecular pharmaceutics.