Land use change scenarios and associated groundwater impacts in a protected peri-urban area

Land use changes in peri-urban areas are usually associated with significant impacts on groundwater resources due to alteration of the recharge regime as well as through the establishment of pollution sources. Quantifying the aforementioned impacts and assessing the vulnerability of the groundwater resources is an important step for the better management and protection of the aquifers. In the present study, a physically based, distributed hydrologic model has been used to identify the impacts from specific land use change scenarios in the protected area of Loutraki catchment. A vulnerability assessment method has been also implemented to provide a decision support tool to the land planning authorities and also hydrologic mitigation measures for the sustainable development of the area have been proposed. The hydrologic impacts of the land use scenarios include a 5% reduction in the annual recharge of the study aquifer for scenario 1 (doubling of the current urban areas) and 7% decrease for scenario 2 (tripling of the current urban areas). Nevertheless, these impacts can be minimised if small-scale artificial recharge infrastructure is developed and the land planning measures suggested through the vulnerability and recharge maps will be followed.

[1]  Marie-Odile Cordier,et al.  Parameterisation of hydrological models: a review and lessons learned from studies of an agricultural catchment (Naizin, France) , 2002 .

[2]  Elias Dimitriou,et al.  Integrated water management scenarios for wetland protection: application in Trichonis Lake , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[4]  F. Zwahlen,et al.  Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method) , 1999 .

[5]  J. Refsgaard Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[6]  Chadi Abdallah,et al.  Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zones: the case of Occidental Lebanon , 2006 .

[7]  Hugo A. Loáiciga,et al.  Distributed hydrological modelling in California semi-arid shrublands: MIKE SHE model calibration and uncertainty estimation , 2006 .

[8]  A. Jakeman,et al.  A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall‐runoff modeling and its implications , 2001 .

[9]  C. Cosenza,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[10]  J. Thompson,et al.  Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England , 2004 .

[11]  C. Demetriou,et al.  Evaluating sustainable groundwater management options using the MIKE SHE integrated hydrogeological modelling package , 1998, Environ. Model. Softw..