Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality and patient absorbed dose in lumbar spine radiography

The 'European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images' do not address the choice of film characteristic (H/D) curve, which is an important parameter for the description of a radiographic screen-film system. Since it is not possible to investigate this influence by taking repeated exposures of the same patients on films with systematically varied H/D curves, patient images of lumbar spine were digitised in the current study. The image contrast was altered by digital image processing techniques, simulating images with H/D curves varying from flat over standard latitude to a film type steeper than a mammography film. The manipulated images were printed on film for evaluation. Seven European radiologists evaluated the clinical image quality of in total 224 images by analysing the fulfilment of the European Image Criteria and by visual grading analysis of the images. The results show that the local quality can be significantly improved by the application of films with a steeper film H/D curve compared to the standard latitude film. For images with an average optical density of about 1.25, the application of the steeper film results in a reduction of patient absorbed dose by about 10-15% without a loss of diagnostically relevant image information. The results also show that the patient absorbed dose reduction obtained by altering the tube voltage from 70 kV to 90 kV coincides with a loss of image information that cannot be compensated for by simply changing the shape of the H/D curve.

[1]  Lars Gunnar Månsson Evaluation of radiographic procedures : investigations related to chest imaging , 1994 .

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  J. Hanley Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[4]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[5]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[6]  D. Hoeschen,et al.  Correlation Between Physical Image Quality Parameters and Visually Perceptible Image Quality in X-Ray Diagnosis , 1993 .

[7]  S. Mattsson,et al.  Comparison of two methods for evaluating image quality of chest radiographs , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Anders Tingberg Quantifying the quality of medical x-ray images. An evaluation based on normal anatomy for lumbar spine and chest radiography. , 2000 .

[9]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  L B Lusted,et al.  Factors affecting the detectability of a simulated radiographic signal. , 1973, Investigative radiology.

[11]  D. Chakraborty,et al.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. , 1990, Radiology.

[12]  M Zankl,et al.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  B B Hobbs,et al.  Detection accuracy in chest radiography. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Optimization of chest and lumbar spine radiography by Monte Carlo modeling of the patient and imaging system , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Evaluation of lumbar spine images with added pathology , 2000, Medical Imaging.