PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ANTEPARTUM FETAL HEART RATE NON‐STRESS TEST IN HIGH‐RISK PREGNANCY

Abstract. For antepartum evaluation of high‐risk pregnancies the non‐stress test (NST) was performed in order to predict favorable or adverse fetal outcome. Between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1980, 4078 NSTs were performed on 454 women with high‐risk pregnancies. The NSTs were evaluated for pathology by a CTG pathology score. The NST interpretation were normal 95%, slight pathological 4% and severe pathological 1%. The group of women in whom all NST results were normal gave birth to healthy babies. In tact with an increasing number of pathologica‐NSTs and with worsening CTG pathology score, a significant increase was found for cesarean section rate, acute operative delivery, low Apgar score, low umbilical cord artery pH and infants born small for gestational age or clinically dysmature. The frequence of perinatal morbidity was almost the same, irrespective of whether the NSTs showed accelarations or not on one or more occasions. To identify fetuses suffering from retarded intra‐uterine growth the predictive value of normal NST was 97.3% and the predictive value of pathological NST was 34.8%. To identify perinatal morbidity the predictive values were 87.4% and 55.1% respectively. The NST appears to be a realiable test for antepartum assessment of fetal well‐being in high‐risk pregnancies.

[1]  R. Knuppel,et al.  A review of the nonstress test. , 1982, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[2]  C. Lenstrup Predictive Value of a Single Unstressed Antepartum Cardiotocogram in Apparently Uncomplicated Pregnancy , 1982, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  M. E. Towell,et al.  ABNORMAL FETAL HEART RATE ASSOCIATED WITH CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES , 1980, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  M. Keirse,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF ANTEPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAMS IN HIGH‐RISK PREGNANCY , 1980, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  K. Käär Antepartal cardiotocography in the assessment of fetal outcome , 1980, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[6]  R. Paul,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  R. Paul,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. V. The nonstress test--an outpatient approach. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  B. Schifrin,et al.  Routine fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period. , 1979, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  C. Y. Lee,et al.  The nonstress test for the antepartum assessment of fetal reserve. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  R. Paul,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate testing , 1979 .

[11]  R. Paul,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate testing: the nonstress test. , 1978, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. Dobbing The current status of fetal heart rate monitoring and ultrasound in obstetrics , 1978 .

[13]  D. Nochimson,et al.  The nonstress test. , 1978, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  C. Y. Lee,et al.  Fetal activity acceleration determination for the evaluation of fetal reserve. , 1976, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  D. Nochimson,et al.  An Evaluation of the Significance of a Positive Oxytocin Challenge Test , 1976, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Lee Cy,et al.  A study of fetal heart rate acceleration patterns. , 1975 .

[17]  C. Y. Lee,et al.  A Study of Fetal Heart Rate Acceleration Patterns , 1975, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  R. Freeman,et al.  Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.