Discipline-based instruction to promote interdisciplinary design of wearable and pervasive computing products

This paper reports on a design experience for undergraduates in computer engineering, industrial design, and marketing that focuses on pervasive computing devices. Across a broad range of targeted application areas and user groups, many of the student designs have been wearable computers. Consequently, our course will be of interest to the wearable computing community, particularly in terms of our aim of bridging the gap between design and engineering. For the two most recent offerings of the course, we have utilized external observers and surveyed the students in order to validate the impact of aspects of our process and changes to it. This paper is based upon 5 years of experience and 2 years of analysis of our course, and it presents an overview of our process with both qualitative and quantitative results from these two most recent offerings.

[1]  Richard Martin,et al.  Design for wearability , 1998, Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215).

[2]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[3]  Erin V. Lehman,et al.  Team Diagnostic Survey , 2005 .

[4]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[5]  Todd C. Kelley,et al.  The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm , 2001 .

[6]  Lisa D. McNair,et al.  A Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Design Course for Pervasive Computing , 2010 .

[7]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  User-centered interdisciplinary design of wearable computers , 1999, MOCO.

[8]  Jane McCann,et al.  A design process for the development of innovative smart clothing that addresses end-user needs from technical, functional, aesthetic and cultural view points , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05).

[9]  Michael Trottier,et al.  On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research , 2011 .

[10]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[11]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Benchmarking An Interdisciplinary Concurrent Design Methodology for Electronic/Mechanical Systems , 1995, 32nd Design Automation Conference.

[12]  Yang Li,et al.  External representations in ubiquitous computing design and the implications for design tools , 2006, DIS '06.

[13]  Tom Igoe.  Making Things Talk - Practical Methods for Connecting Physical Objects, Second Edition , 2011 .

[14]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[15]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[16]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval , 2001 .

[17]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[18]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[19]  Thomas Martin,et al.  The role of design in wearable computing , 2008, 2008 12th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[20]  Thomas L. Martin,et al.  Situativity Approaches for Improving Interdisciplinary Team Processes , 2010 .

[21]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .