Relationship between Psychophysical Abilities and Speech Perception for Subjects with Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Hearing Impairments

Over the past few years several groups have reported studies of the relationship between psychophysical abilities and speech perception in the hearing impaired (e.g., Dreschler and Plomp, 1980, 1985; Festen and Plomp, 1983; Patterson et al., 1982; Tyler et al., 1982). Such studies can have a number of different (non-exclusive) purposes, including: 1) To gain more insight into the difficulties of speech perception experienced by the hearing impaired, especially in noisy situations; 2) To make inferences about the relative importance of different types of information in speech (e.g., spectral versus temporal); 3) to provide guidelines for the design of “signal-processing” hearing aids which are intended to (partially) compensate for one or more of the deficits found in the hearing impaired. Our own work in this area has all three of these purposes, but in this paper we will concentrate on the first two.

[1]  B. Moore,et al.  Auditory Frequency Selectivity , 1986, Nato ASI Series.

[2]  John Bamford,et al.  Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .

[3]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[4]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Moore Frequency Selectivity in Hearing , 1987 .

[7]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Arthur Boothroyd,et al.  Developments in Speech Audiometry , 1968 .

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing‐impaired subjects. II , 1980 .

[13]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[14]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.