THE MOSDEF SURVEY: DYNAMICAL AND BARYONIC MASSES AND KINEMATIC STRUCTURES OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT 1.4 ≤ z ≤ 2.6

We present H &agr; ?> gas kinematics for 178 star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 2 ?> from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field survey. We have developed models to interpret the kinematic measurements from fixed-angle multi-object spectroscopy, using structural parameters derived from Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey Hubble Space Telescope/F160W imaging. For 35 galaxies, we measure resolved rotation with a median of ( V / &sgr; V , 0 ) R E = 2.1 ?> . We derive dynamical masses from the kinematics and sizes and compare them to baryonic masses, with gas masses estimated from dust-corrected H &agr; ?> star formation rates (SFRs) and the Kennicutt–Schmidt relation. When assuming that galaxies with and without observed rotation have the same median ( V / &sgr; V , 0 ) R E ?> , we find good agreement between the dynamical and baryonic masses, with a scatter of &sgr; rms = 0.34 dex ?> and a median offset of Δ log 10 M = 0.04 dex ?> . This comparison implies a low dark matter fraction (8% within an effective radius) for a Chabrier initial mass function (IMF), and disfavors a Salpeter IMF. Moreover, the requirement that M dyn ?> / M baryon ?> should be independent of inclination yields a median value of ( V / &sgr; V , 0 ) R E = 2.1 ?> for galaxies without observed rotation. If, instead, we treat the galaxies without detected rotation as early-type galaxies, the masses are also in reasonable agreement ( Δ log 10 M = − 0.07 dex ?> , &sgr; rms = 0.37 dex ?> ). The inclusion of gas masses is critical in this comparison; if gas masses are excluded, there is an increasing trend of M dyn ?> / M * ?> with higher specific SFR (SSFR). Furthermore, we find indications that V / &sgr; ?> decreases with increasing H &agr; ?> SSFR for our full sample, which may reflect disk settling. We also study the Tully–Fisher relation and find that at fixed stellar mass S 0.5 = ( 0.5 V 2.2 2 + &sgr; V , 0 2 ) 1 / 2 ?> was higher at earlier times. At fixed baryonic mass, we observe the opposite trend. Finally, the baryonic and dynamical masses of the active galactic nuclei in our sample are also in excellent agreement, suggesting that the kinematics trace the host galaxies.

[1]  A. Coil,et al.  THE MOSDEF SURVEY: DISSECTING THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION USING Hα AND Hβ EMISSION LINES AT z ∼ 2 , 2015, 1507.03017.

[2]  A. V. D. Wel,et al.  FORMING COMPACT MASSIVE GALAXIES , 2015, 1506.03085.

[3]  A. Coil,et al.  THE MOSDEF SURVEY: MEASUREMENTS OF BALMER DECREMENTS AND THE DUST ATTENUATION CURVE AT REDSHIFTS z ∼ 1.4–2.6 , 2015, 1504.02782.

[4]  P. Dokkum,et al.  ONE PLANE FOR ALL: MASSIVE STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES LIE ON THE SAME MASS FUNDAMENTAL PLANE AT z ∼ 0 AND z ∼ 0.7 , 2014, 1410.5818.

[5]  M. Fabricius,et al.  THE KMOS3D SURVEY: DESIGN, FIRST RESULTS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY KINEMATICS FROM 0.7 ⩽ z ⩽ 2.7 , 2014, 1409.6791.

[6]  A. Coil,et al.  THE MOSDEF SURVEY: OPTICAL ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS DIAGNOSTICS AT z ∼ 2.3 , 2014, 1409.6522.

[7]  B. Weiner,et al.  COMBINED CO AND DUST SCALING RELATIONS OF DEPLETION TIME AND MOLECULAR GAS FRACTIONS WITH COSMIC TIME, SPECIFIC STAR-FORMATION RATE, AND STELLAR MASS , 2014, 1409.1171.

[8]  D. Hogg,et al.  triangle.py v0.1.1 , 2014 .

[9]  H. Rix,et al.  GEOMETRY OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES FROM SDSS, 3D-HST, AND CANDELS , 2014, 1407.4233.

[10]  D. Wake,et al.  3D-HST+CANDELS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY SIZE–MASS DISTRIBUTION SINCE z = 3 , 2014, 1404.2844.

[11]  Shannon G. Patel,et al.  3D-HST WFC3-SELECTED PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS IN THE FIVE CANDELS/3D-HST FIELDS: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR MASSES , 2014, 1403.3689.

[12]  F. Bournaud,et al.  Active galactic nuclei-driven outflows without immediate quenching in simulations of high-redshift disc galaxies , 2014, 1402.4482.

[13]  S. Belli,et al.  VELOCITY DISPERSIONS AND DYNAMICAL MASSES FOR A LARGE SAMPLE OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z > 1: IMPROVED MEASURES OF THE GROWTH IN MASS AND SIZE , 2013, 1311.3317.

[14]  G. Zamorani,et al.  THE SINS/zC-SINF SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: EVIDENCE FOR POWERFUL ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS-DRIVEN NUCLEAR OUTFLOWS IN MASSIVE STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2013, 1311.2596.

[15]  P. McCarthy,et al.  DYNAMO – I. A sample of Hα-luminous galaxies with resolved kinematics , 2013, 1310.6082.

[16]  B. Lundgren,et al.  DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF DUST ATTENUATION IN z ∼ 1.5 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES FROM 3D-HST: IMPLICATIONS FOR DUST GEOMETRY AND STAR FORMATION RATES , 2013, 1310.4177.

[17]  G. Zamorani,et al.  THE SINS/zC-SINF SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: EVIDENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL QUENCHING , 2013, 1310.3838.

[18]  C. Conselice,et al.  SINFONI/VLT 3D spectroscopy of massive galaxies: evidence of rotational support at z ∼ 1.4 , 2013, 1305.0268.

[19]  H. Rix,et al.  THE ASSEMBLY OF MILKY-WAY-LIKE GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 2.5 , 2013, 1304.2391.

[20]  H. Rix,et al.  THE RADIAL DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 FROM THE 3D-HST SURVEY , 2013, 1301.0320.

[21]  Andreas Burkert,et al.  THE SINS/zC-SINF SURVEY OF z ∼ 2GALAXY KINEMATICS: THE NATURE OF DISPERSION-DOMINATED GALAXIES , 2012, 1211.6160.

[22]  B. Weiner,et al.  PHIBSS: MOLECULAR GAS CONTENT AND SCALING RELATIONS IN z ∼ 1–3 MASSIVE, MAIN-SEQUENCE STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2012, 1211.5743.

[23]  H. Rix,et al.  STELLAR KINEMATICS OF z ∼ 2 GALAXIES AND THE INSIDE-OUT GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES, , 2012, 1211.3424.

[24]  M. Sullivan,et al.  UNCOVERING DRIVERS OF DISK ASSEMBLY: BULGELESS GALAXIES AND THE STELLAR MASS TULLY–FISHER RELATION , 2012, 1211.3415.

[25]  P. Dokkum,et al.  MASSIVE AND NEWLY DEAD: DISCOVERY OF A SIGNIFICANT POPULATION OF GALAXIES WITH HIGH-VELOCITY DISPERSIONS AND STRONG BALMER LINES AT z ∼ 1.5 FROM DEEP KECK SPECTRA AND HST/WFC3 IMAGING , 2012, 1210.7236.

[26]  Sean Adkins,et al.  MOSFIRE, the multi-object spectrometer for infra-red exploration at the Keck Observatory , 2012, Other Conferences.

[27]  G. Illingworth,et al.  THE STELLAR MASS STRUCTURE OF MASSIVE GALAXIES FROM z = 0 TO z = 2.5: SURFACE DENSITY PROFILES AND HALF-MASS RADII , 2012, 1208.4363.

[28]  B. Weiner,et al.  THE EPOCH OF DISK SETTLING: z ∼ 1 TO NOW , 2012, 1207.7072.

[29]  David R. Law,et al.  A HST/WFC3-IR MORPHOLOGICAL SURVEY OF GALAXIES AT z = 1.5–3.6. II. THE RELATION BETWEEN MORPHOLOGY AND GAS-PHASE KINEMATICS , 2012, 1206.6889.

[30]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  3D-HST: A WIDE-FIELD GRISM SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE , 2012, 1204.2829.

[31]  A. Dekel,et al.  On the effect of cosmological inflow on turbulence and instability in galactic discs , 2012, 1203.0810.

[32]  C. Blake,et al.  Scaling relations of star-forming regions: from kpc-sized clumps to H ii regions , 2012, 1203.0309.

[33]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[34]  B. Garilli,et al.  MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS - IV. Fundamental relations of star-forming galaxies at 1 < z < 1.6 , 2012, 1202.3107.

[35]  H. Rix,et al.  SPATIALLY RESOLVED Hα MAPS AND SIZES OF 57 STRONGLY STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 FROM 3D-HST: EVIDENCE FOR RAPID INSIDE-OUT ASSEMBLY OF DISK GALAXIES , 2012, 1202.1822.

[36]  M. Sullivan,et al.  THE ASSEMBLY HISTORY OF DISK GALAXIES. II. PROBING THE EMERGING TULLY–FISHER RELATION DURING 1 < z < 1.7 , 2012, 1201.4386.

[37]  L. Paioro,et al.  MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS - II. Kinematics and close environment classification , 2012, 1201.3329.

[38]  A. Bolton,et al.  The SWELLS survey. III. Disfavouring "heavy" initial mass functions for spiral lens galaxies , 2012, 1201.1677.

[39]  B. Garilli,et al.  MASSIV: Mass Assemby Survey with SINFONI in VVDS. I. Survey description and global properties of the 0.9 < z < 1.8 galaxy sample , 2011, 1111.3631.

[40]  P. Cox,et al.  THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM IN DISTANT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES: TURBULENT PRESSURE, FRAGMENTATION, AND CLOUD SCALING RELATIONS IN A DENSE GAS DISK AT z = 2.3 , 2011, 1110.2780.

[41]  A. Dekel,et al.  Evolution of violent gravitational disc instability in galaxies: late stabilization by transition from gas to stellar dominance , 2011, 1110.2412.

[42]  David R. Law,et al.  AN HST/WFC3-IR MORPHOLOGICAL SURVEY OF GALAXIES AT z = 1.5–3.6. I. SURVEY DESCRIPTION AND MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2011, 1107.3137.

[43]  A. Dekel,et al.  Rotational support of giant clumps in high-z disc galaxies , 2011, 1106.5587.

[44]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES FROM ULTRA-DEEP HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 IMAGING: THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1106.1641.

[45]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[46]  M. Sullivan,et al.  THE ASSEMBLY HISTORY OF DISK GALAXIES. I. THE TULLY–FISHER RELATION TO z ≃ 1.3 FROM DEEP EXPOSURES WITH DEIMOS , 2011, 1102.3911.

[47]  S. More,et al.  Dark halo response and the stellar initial mass function in early-type and late-type galaxies , 2010, 1012.5859.

[48]  G. Zamorani,et al.  THE SINS SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: PROPERTIES OF THE GIANT STAR-FORMING CLUMPS , 2010, 1011.5360.

[49]  Jeremiah P. Ostriker,et al.  THE TWO PHASES OF GALAXY FORMATION , 2010, 1010.1381.

[50]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  ON THE MASSES OF GALAXIES IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE , 2010, 1009.1620.

[51]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Dynamical properties of AMAZE and LSD galaxies from gas kinematics and the Tully-Fisher relation at z~3 , 2010, 1007.4180.

[52]  Harland Epps,et al.  Design and development of MOSFIRE: the multi-object spectrometer for infrared exploration at the Keck Observatory , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[53]  Romain Teyssier,et al.  HYDRODYNAMICS OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXY COLLISIONS: FROM GAS-RICH DISKS TO DISPERSION-DOMINATED MERGERS AND COMPACT SPHEROIDS , 2010, 1006.4782.

[54]  J. Newman,et al.  On the evolution of the velocity–mass–size relations of disc-dominated galaxies over the past 10 billion years , 2010, 1006.3558.

[55]  T. Treu,et al.  KECK SPECTROSCOPY OF z>1 FIELD SPHEROIDALS: DYNAMICAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE GROWTH RATE OF RED “NUGGETS” , 2010, 1004.1331.

[56]  B. Weiner,et al.  A study of the gas–star formation relation over cosmic time , 2010, 1003.5180.

[57]  M. C. Cooper,et al.  High molecular gas fractions in normal massive star-forming galaxies in the young Universe , 2010, Nature.

[58]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.

[59]  J. Gunn,et al.  THE PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTIES IN STELLAR POPULATION SYNTHESIS MODELING. III. MODEL CALIBRATION, COMPARISON, AND EVALUATION , 2009, 0911.3151.

[60]  D. Elbaz,et al.  VERY HIGH GAS FRACTIONS AND EXTENDED GAS RESERVOIRS IN z = 1.5 DISK GALAXIES , 2009, 0911.2776.

[61]  M. Blanton,et al.  Physical properties and environments of nearby galaxies , 2009, 0908.3017.

[62]  M. Franx,et al.  THE EVOLVING RELATIONS BETWEEN SIZE, MASS, SURFACE DENSITY, AND STAR FORMATION IN 3 × 104 GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 , 2009, 0906.4786.

[63]  B. Elmegreen,et al.  CLUMPY GALAXIES IN GOODS AND GEMS: MASSIVE ANALOGS OF LOCAL DWARF IRREGULARS , 2009, 0906.2660.

[64]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  AN ULTRA-DEEP NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRUM OF A COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXY AT z = 2.2 , 2009, 0905.1692.

[65]  C. Balkowski,et al.  Evidence for strong dynamical evolution in disc galaxies through the last 11 Gyr. GHASP VIII – a local reference sample of rotating disc galaxies for high‐redshift studies , 2009, 0904.3891.

[66]  B. Garilli,et al.  Integral field spectroscopy with SINFONI of VVDS galaxies I. Galaxy dynamics and mass assembly at 1.2 < z < 1.6 , 2009, 0903.1211.

[67]  James E. Larkin,et al.  THE KILOPARSEC-SCALE KINEMATICS OF HIGH-REDSHIFT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2009, 0901.2930.

[68]  Daniel Ceverino,et al.  FORMATION OF MASSIVE GALAXIES AT HIGH REDSHIFT: COLD STREAMS, CLUMPY DISKS, AND COMPACT SPHEROIDS , 2009, 0901.2458.

[69]  James E. Larkin,et al.  DYNAMICS OF GALACTIC DISKS AND MERGERS AT z ∼ 1.6: SPATIALLY RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY WITH KECK LASER GUIDE STAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS , 2008, 0810.5599.

[70]  A. Dutton On the origin of exponential galaxy discs , 2008, 0810.5164.

[71]  C. Steidel,et al.  A STEEP FAINT-END SLOPE OF THE UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTION AT z ∼ 2–3: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL STELLAR MASS DENSITY AND STAR FORMATION IN LOW-MASS HALOS , 2008, 0810.2788.

[72]  R. Davé,et al.  Galaxies in a simulated ΛCDM Universe – I. Cold mode and hot cores , 2008, 0809.1430.

[73]  S. Rabien,et al.  From Rings to Bulges: Evidence for Rapid Secular Galaxy Evolution at z ~ 2 from Integral Field Spectroscopy in the SINS Survey , 2008, 0807.1184.

[74]  Michele Cappellari,et al.  Measuring the inclination and mass-to-light ratio of axisymmetric galaxies via anisotropic Jeans models of stellar kinematics , 2008, 0806.0042.

[75]  J. Gach,et al.  GHASP: an Hα kinematic survey of spiral and irregular galaxies - VI. New Hα data cubes for 108 galaxies , 2008, 0805.0976.

[76]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Submillimeter Galaxies at z ~ 2: Evidence for Major Mergers and Constraints on Lifetimes, IMF, and CO-H2 Conversion Factor , 2008, 0801.3650.

[77]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  Vigorous Star Formation with Low Efficiency in Massive Disk Galaxies at z = 1.5 , 2007, 0711.4995.

[78]  R. Dav'e The galaxy stellar mass-star formation rate relation: evidence for an evolving stellar initial mass function? , 2007, 0710.0381.

[79]  James E. Larkin,et al.  Integral Field Spectroscopy of High-Redshift Star-forming Galaxies with Laser-guided Adaptive Optics: Evidence for Dispersion-dominated Kinematics , 2007, 0707.3634.

[80]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Dynamical Properties of z ~ 2 Star-forming Galaxies and a Universal Star Formation Relation , 2007, 0706.2656.

[81]  Miguel Ángel Martínez,et al.  Variable Very High Energy γ-Ray Emission from Markarian 501 , 2007, astro-ph/0702008.

[82]  Columbia,et al.  Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: The Dominance of Gradually Declining Star Formation, and the Main Sequence of Star-forming Galaxies , 2007, astro-ph/0701924.

[83]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  Resolved Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Star Formation in Disks at High Redshift , 2007, astro-ph/0701121.

[84]  M. McElwain,et al.  Integral Field Spectroscopy of a Candidate Disk Galaxy at z ~ 1.5 Using Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics , 2006, astro-ph/0612199.

[85]  B. Weiner,et al.  The Stellar Mass Tully-Fisher Relation to z = 1.2 from AEGIS , 2006, astro-ph/0702643.

[86]  C. Steidel,et al.  The Physical Nature of Rest-UV Galaxy Morphology during the Peak Epoch of Galaxy Formation , 2006, astro-ph/0610693.

[87]  P. P. van der Werf,et al.  What Do We Learn from IRAC Observations of Galaxies at 2 < z < 3.5? , 2006, astro-ph/0609548.

[88]  B. Elmegreen,et al.  Observations of Thick Disks in the Hubble Space Telescope Ultra Deep Field , 2006, astro-ph/0607540.

[89]  R. Abuter,et al.  SINFONI Integral Field Spectroscopy of z ~ 2 UV-selected Galaxies: Rotation Curves and Dynamical Evolution , 2006, astro-ph/0603559.

[90]  Fabio Governato,et al.  Forming disc galaxies in ΛCDM simulations , 2006 .

[91]  A. Hopkins,et al.  On the Normalization of the Cosmic Star Formation History , 2006, astro-ph/0601463.

[92]  R. Davies,et al.  The SAURON project - IV. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the Fundamental Plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0505042.

[93]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  Dark Matter and Stellar Mass in the Luminous Regions of Disk Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0504581.

[94]  M. Shmakova,et al.  Observation of Small-Scale Structure Using Sextupole Lensing , 2005, astro-ph/0504200.

[95]  I. Smail,et al.  A Redshift Survey of the Submillimeter Galaxy Population , 2004, astro-ph/0412573.

[96]  A. Dekel,et al.  Galaxy bimodality due to cold flows and shock heating , 2004, astro-ph/0412300.

[97]  Ralf Bender,et al.  KMOS: an infrared multiple-object integral field spectrograph for the ESO VLT , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[98]  G. Chabrier Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.

[99]  R. Davé,et al.  How do galaxies get their gas , 2002, astro-ph/0407095.

[100]  F. V. D. Bosch The origin of the density distribution of disc galaxies: a new problem for the standard model of disc formation , 2001, astro-ph/0107195.

[101]  J. Cuby,et al.  The Rest-Frame Optical Spectra of Lyman Break Galaxies: Star Formation, Extinction, Abundances, and Kinematics , 2001, astro-ph/0102456.

[102]  E. Bell,et al.  Stellar Mass-to-Light Ratios and the Tully-Fisher Relation , 2000, astro-ph/0008056.

[103]  A. Kinney,et al.  The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911459.

[104]  C. Pritchet,et al.  Analysis of Spatially Resolved Emission Lines in the Spectra of Distant Galaxies , 1999 .

[105]  R. Nichol,et al.  High-Redshift Quasars Found in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data , 1999, astro-ph/0103228.

[106]  Jr.,et al.  The Global Schmidt law in star forming galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9712213.

[107]  S. White,et al.  The formation of galactic discs , 1997, astro-ph/9707093.

[108]  A. Fabian,et al.  Active Galactic Nuclei , 1997 .

[109]  D. Spergel,et al.  The Formation of Disk Galaxies , 1996, astro-ph/9611226.

[110]  Carlos S. Frenk,et al.  Galaxy formation through hierarchical clustering , 1991 .

[111]  J. Mathis,et al.  The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .

[112]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Formation of galaxies and large-scale structure with cold dark matter , 1984, Nature.

[113]  S. M. Fall,et al.  Formation and rotation of disc galaxies with haloes , 1980 .

[114]  M. Rees,et al.  Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering , 1978 .

[115]  MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES FROM ULTRADEEP HST WFC3 IMAGING: THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE AT Z , 2013 .

[116]  N. Vogt,et al.  A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to Z ∼ 1 in the Tkrs/goods-n Field. Ii. Evolution in the Tully-fisher Relation , 2006 .

[117]  Accepted for publication in ApJ Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 12/14/05 THE STELLAR, GAS AND DYNAMICAL MASSES OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT Z ∼ 2 1 , 2006 .

[118]  A. Szalay,et al.  High-Redshift Quasars Found in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data. IV. Luminosity Function from the Fall Equatorial Stripe Sample , 2001 .

[119]  Accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal Optical Rotation Curves and Linewidths for Tully-Fisher Applications 1 , 1997 .

[120]  Submitted to The Astronomical Journal , 1995 .

[121]  D. Osterbrock,et al.  Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei , 1989 .

[122]  K. Freeman On the disks of spiral and SO Galaxies , 1970 .

[123]  E. Salpeter The Luminosity function and stellar evolution , 1955 .

[124]  M. Franx,et al.  SUBMITTED TO THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 DETECTION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES IN A BICOLOR SEQUENCE FROM Z = 0 − 2 , 2022 .

[125]  J. Gunn,et al.  THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTIES IN STELLAR POPULATION SYNTHESIS MODELING I: THE RELEVANCE OF UNCERTAIN ASPECTS OF STELLAR EVOLUTION AND THE IMF TO THE DERIVED PHYSICAL PR , 2022 .