Groups in Space: Stereotypes and the Spatial Agency Bias

Abstract We propose that spatial imagery is systematically linked to stereotypic beliefs, such that more agentic groups are envisaged to the left of less agentic groups. This spatial agency bias was tested in three studies. In Study 1, a content analysis of over 200 images of male–female pairs (including artwork, photographs, and cartoons) showed that males were over-proportionally presented to the left of females, but only for couples in which the male was perceived as more agentic. Study 2 ( N  = 40) showed that people tend to draw males to the left of females, but only if they hold stereotypic beliefs that associate males with greater agency. Study 3 ( N  = 61) investigated whether scanning habits due to writing direction are responsible for the spatial agency bias. We found a tendency for Italian-speakers to position agentic groups (men and young people) to the left of less agentic groups (females and old people), but a reversal in Arabic-speakers who tended to position the more agentic groups to the right. Together, our results suggest a subtle spatial bias in the representation of social groups that seems to be linked to culturally determined writing/reading habits.

[1]  Israel Nachson,et al.  Effects of Directional Habits and Handedness on Aesthetic Preference for Left and Right Profiles , 1999 .

[2]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth , 1999 .

[3]  Anne Maass,et al.  How Beautiful is the Goal and How Violent is the Fistfight? Spatial Bias in the Interpretation of Human Behavior , 2007 .

[4]  R. Jackendoff.  The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface , 1996 .

[5]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Portrait Profiles and the Notion of Agency , 2002 .

[6]  L. Boroditsky.  Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Anne Maass,et al.  Directional Bias in the Mental Representation of Spatial Events , 2003, Psychological science.

[8]  R. Helson.  Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents , 1979, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  I. Gordon.  Left and right in Goya's portraits , 1974, Nature.

[10]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences is Spatially Organised: Evidence from Days of the Week , 2004, Cortex.

[11]  M. Conway,et al.  Status, communality, and agency: implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Archer,et al.  Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. , 1983 .

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[14]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Laterality of expression in portraiture: putting your best cheek forward , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Caterina Suitner,et al.  Positioning Bias in Portraits and Self-Portraits: Do Female Artists Make Different Choices? , 2007 .

[16]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[17]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Cerebral Lateralization and Some Implications for Art, Aesthetic Perception, and Artistic Creativity , 1988 .

[18]  N. Humphrey,et al.  Status and the left cheek , 1973 .

[19]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Perceptual Bias for Forward-Facing Motion , 1992 .

[20]  Linda B. Smith.  Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment , 2005 .

[21]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Time (also) flies from left to right , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  I. Mcmanus,et al.  Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts , 2005, European Review.

[25]  N. Schwarz,et al.  What's in a picture? The impact of face‐ism on trait attribution , 1989 .

[26]  H. Hughes.  A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology , 2004 .

[27]  C. Cate.  Posing as Professor: Laterality in Posing Orientation for Portraits of Scientists , 2002 .

[28]  Studies in perceptual development, 3: perceptual exploration. , 1967, Child development.

[29]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Language, interaction and social cognition , 1992 .

[30]  C. Judd,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[32]  A. Abele.  The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  R. Kolbe,et al.  Man to Man: A Content Analysis of Sole-Male Images in Male-Audience Magazines , 1996 .

[35]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Beauty and the Brain: Biological Aspects of Aesthetics , 2000 .

[36]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  A. Mulac,et al.  Linguistic Contributors to the Gender-Linked Language Effect , 1986 .

[38]  Jacqueline Fagard,et al.  The effects of reading-writing direction on the asymmetry of space perception and directional tendencies: A comparison between French and Tunisian children , 2003, Laterality.

[39]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Language and space: some interactions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  S. Chokron,et al.  Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  T. Hubbard.  Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Thomas M. Spalek,et al.  Supporting the attentional momentum view of IOR: Is attention biased to go right? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Studies in perceptual development. , 1907 .

[47]  J. Clifton.  Gender and Shame in Masaccio’s Expulsion from the Garden of Eden , 1999 .

[48]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  B. Thurston,et al.  The duality of human existence , 1966 .

[50]  R. Borden,et al.  Handedness and lateral positioning in heterosexual couples: Are men still strong-arming women? , 1978 .

[51]  Anthony Mulac.  Evaluation of the speech dialect attitudinal scale , 1975 .

[52]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents , 1978 .

[53]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.