What use are computational models of cognitive processes

Computational modellers are not always explicit about their motivations for constructing mod- els, nor are they always explicit about the theoretical implications of their models once con- structed. Perhaps in part due to this, models have been criticised as “black-box” exercises which can play little or no role in scientific explanation. This paper argues that models are useful, and that the motivations for constructing computational models can be made clear by considering the roles that tautologies can play in the development of explanatory theories. From this, additionally, I propose that although there are diverse benefits of model building, only one class of benefits — those which relate to explanation — can provide justification for the activity.

[1]  Stephan Lewandowsky General Article THE REWARDS AND HAZARDS OF COMPUTER SIMULATIONS , 1993 .

[2]  Paul Krugman,et al.  How I Work , 1993 .

[3]  Christina E. Erneling,et al.  The Future of the Cognitive Revolution , 1997 .

[4]  原田 秀逸 私の computer 環境 , 1998 .

[5]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[6]  Ralph Linsker,et al.  Self-organization in a perceptual network , 1988, Computer.

[7]  D. Geary,et al.  Psychonomic Bulletin Review , 2000 .

[8]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[10]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  New Ideas in Psychology , 2005 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[12]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[13]  P. Smolensky On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  A. Tellegen,et al.  in Psychological Science , 1996 .

[15]  G. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 1999 .

[16]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Making machines (and artificial intelligence) see , 1989 .

[17]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Neural networks and neuroscience: what are connectionist simulations good for? , 1997 .

[19]  M. McCloskey Networks and Theories: The Place of Connectionism in Cognitive Science , 1991 .

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[21]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[23]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[24]  K. J. Craik,et al.  The nature of explanation , 1944 .

[25]  R. Ellis,et al.  Connectionist psychology: A text with readings , 1999 .

[26]  I. Hacking,et al.  Against Method (revised edition). , 1991 .

[27]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[28]  Methods of Theoretical Psychology , 2001 .

[29]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology , 2014, Scholarpedia.

[30]  Francis Crick,et al.  The recent excitement about neural networks , 1989, Nature.

[31]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[32]  D. P. Gallogly,et al.  Computational analyses in cognitive neuroscience: In defense of biological implausibility , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[34]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling , 2005 .

[35]  A. Kukla AMPLIFICATION AND SIMPLIFICATION AS MODES OF THEORETICAL ANALYSIS IN PSYCHOLOGY , 1995 .

[36]  W. Schmaus Theories of Explanation. Joseph C. Pitt , 1989 .

[37]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Psychological Review , 2003 .

[38]  Joseph C. Pitt,et al.  Theories of Explanation , 1988 .