Human cis-acting elements regulating escape from X-chromosome inactivation function in mouse

Abstract A long-standing question concerning X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) has been how some genes avoid the otherwise stable chromosome-wide heterochromatinization of the inactive X chromosome. As 20% or more of human X-linked genes escape from inactivation, such genes are an important contributor to sex differences in gene expression. Although both human and mouse have genes that escape from XCI, more genes escape in humans than mice, with human escape genes often clustering in larger domains than the single escape genes of mouse. Mouse models offer a well-characterized and readily manipulated system in which to study XCI, but given the differences in genes that escape it is unclear whether the mechanism of escape gene regulation is conserved. To address conservation of the process and the potential to identify elements by modelling human escape gene regulation using mouse, we integrated a human and a mouse BAC each containing an escape gene and flanking subject genes at the mouse X-linked Hprt gene. Escape-level expression and corresponding low promoter DNA methylation of human genes RPS4X and CITED1 demonstrated that the mouse system is capable of recognizing human elements and therefore can be used as a model for further refinement of critical elements necessary for escape from XCI in humans.

[1]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  When the Lyon(ized chromosome) roars: ongoing expression from an inactive X chromosome , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Human Naive Pluripotent Stem Cells Model X Chromosome Dampening and X Inactivation. , 2017, Cell stem cell.

[3]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Human Embryonic Stem Cells Do Not Change Their X Inactivation Status during Differentiation. , 2017, Cell reports.

[4]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  A high-throughput small molecule screen identifies synergism between DNA methylation and Aurora kinase pathways for X reactivation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Andrew J. Dunford,et al.  Tumor suppressor genes that escape from X-inactivation contribute to cancer sex bias , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[6]  David J. Arenillas,et al.  YY1 binding association with sex-biased transcription revealed through X-linked transcript levels and allelic binding analyses , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse , 2016, Nature.

[8]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Escape Artists of the X Chromosome. , 2016, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[9]  Tuck C. Ngun,et al.  The importance of having two X chromosomes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Derivation of consensus inactivation status for X-linked genes from genome-wide studies , 2015, Biology of Sex Differences.

[11]  C. Disteche,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation and escape , 2015, Journal of Genetics.

[12]  N. Hannett,et al.  Transcription factor trapping by RNA in gene regulatory elements , 2015, Science.

[13]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome , 2015, Genome Biology.

[14]  René A. M. Dirks,et al.  Dynamics of gene silencing during X inactivation using allele-specific RNA-seq , 2015, Genome Biology.

[15]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  The lncRNA Firre anchors the inactive X chromosome to the nucleolus by binding CTCF and maintains H3K27me3 methylation , 2015, Genome Biology.

[16]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Escape from X Inactivation Varies in Mouse Tissues , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[17]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[18]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  Jennifer F. Hughes,et al.  Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage-sensitive regulators , 2014, Nature.

[20]  P. Mieczkowski,et al.  Evidence for Local Regulatory Control of Escape from Imprinted X Chromosome Inactivation , 2014, Genetics.

[21]  A. Sharp,et al.  DNA methylation profiling in X;autosome translocations supports a role for L1 repeats in the spread of X chromosome inactivation. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  D. Warburton,et al.  Turner syndrome revisited: review of new data supports the hypothesis that all viable 45,X cases are cryptic mosaics with a rescue cell line, implying an origin by mitotic loss , 2014, Human Genetics.

[23]  L. Carrel,et al.  Deletion of an X-Inactivation Boundary Disrupts Adjacent Gene Silencing , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[24]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Spread of X-chromosome inactivation into autosomal sequences: role for DNA elements, chromatin features and chromosomal domains , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[25]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Targeting of >1.5 Mb of Human DNA into the Mouse X Chromosome Reveals Presence of cis-Acting Regulators of Epigenetic Silencing , 2012, Genetics.

[26]  Wei Sun,et al.  Site-Specific Silencing of Regulatory Elements as a Mechanism of X Inactivation , 2012, Cell.

[27]  E. Simpson,et al.  Modelling Human Regulatory Variation in Mouse: Finding the Function in Genome-Wide Association Studies and Whole-Genome Sequencing , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[28]  Ian M. Wilson,et al.  Chromosome-wide DNA methylation analysis predicts human tissue-specific X inactivation , 2011, Human Genetics.

[29]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms from the human perspective , 2011, Human Genetics.

[30]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Female-biased expression of long non-coding RNAs in domains that escape X-inactivation in mouse , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[31]  L. Carrel,et al.  Strong purifying selection at genes escaping X chromosome inactivation. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  H. Kimura,et al.  Inactive X chromosome-specific histone H3 modifications and CpG hypomethylation flank a chromatin boundary between an X-inactivated and an escape gene , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  E. Simpson,et al.  Next generation tools for high-throughput promoter and expression analysis employing single-copy knock-ins at the Hprt1 locus. , 2009, Genomics.

[34]  F. Tempia,et al.  Selection of Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR Studies in Mouse Brain , 2009, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.

[35]  L. Carrel,et al.  Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Sayan Mukherjee,et al.  Evidence of Influence of Genomic DNA Sequence on Human X Chromosome Inactivation , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  T. Magnuson,et al.  A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  H. Willard,et al.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females , 2005, Nature.

[39]  J. Gécz,et al.  Mutations in the JARID1C gene, which is involved in transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling, cause X-linked mental retardation. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[40]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  C. Disteche,et al.  Comparative sequence and x-inactivation analyses of a domain of escape in human xp11.2 and the conserved segment in mouse. , 2004, Genome research.

[42]  D. Court,et al.  An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[44]  Muriel T. Davisson,et al.  Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[45]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  The mouse Smcx gene exhibits developmental and tissue specific variation in degree of escape from X inactivation. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[46]  H. Willard,et al.  Tissue and lineage-specific variation in inactive X chromosome expression of the murine Smcx gene. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[47]  N. Maeda,et al.  Single-copy transgenic mice with chosen-site integration. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  C. Disteche,et al.  Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[49]  M. A. Goldman,et al.  Mammalian X chromosome inactivation. , 1992, Molecular genetic medicine.