Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration

Abstract Aims A standardized sedation protocol for pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) through irreversible cellular electroporation has not been well established. We report our experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the PFA of AF. Methods and results All consecutive patients undergoing PFA for AF at our center were included. Our sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. We enrolled 66 patients (age = 59 ± 9 years, 78.8% males, body mass index = 28.8 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 21[15–30] min, skin-to-skin time = 75[60–100] min and PFA LA dwell time = 25[22–28] min). By the end of the procedure, PVI had been achieved in all patients by means of PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 56.4 ± 6 min, with 50 (76%) patients being sedated for less than 1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsey Sedation Scale level before ketamine infusion was achieved in all patients except one (78.8% of the patients with rank 3; 19.7% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found to be acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (Score = 0 in 98.5% of cases). All patients reported none or mild pain. No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported. Conclusion Our standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacological offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction. Clinical trial registration Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT05617456.

[1]  E. Maor,et al.  Differential effect of high-frequency electroporation on myocardium vs. non-myocardial tissues , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  M. Caldwell,et al.  A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia , 2022, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  P. Neužil,et al.  Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF) , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  H. Servatius,et al.  Validation of a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for endpoint assessment in pulmonary vein isolation procedures. , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  K. Narayanan,et al.  Worldwide sedation strategies for atrial fibrillation ablation: current status and evolution over the last decade. , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Kalman,et al.  Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: current indications and evolving technologies , 2020, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[7]  J. Osorio,et al.  General anesthesia during atrial fibrillation ablation: Standardized protocol and experience , 2020, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  S. Kaneko,et al.  General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation , 2017, Heart and Vessels.

[9]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: results from a randomized study. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[10]  J. Klein,et al.  Anaesthesia in haemodynamically compromised emergency patients: does ketamine represent the best choice of induction agent? , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[11]  Z. Bosnjak,et al.  Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  D. Steward A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. , 1976, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.