Use of Subjective Global Assessment to Identify Nutrition-Associated Complications and Death in Geriatric Long-Term Care Facility Residents

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of Subjective Global Assessment to identify nutrition-associated complications and death in a geriatric population. A secondary objective was to evaluate the ability of Subjective Global Assessment to identify geriatric residents of long-term care facilities who were undernourished or at risk for developing undernutrition. Methods: Fifty-three consecutive residents who were ≥ 65 years of age and had been residing in a long-term care facility for < 2 weeks were enrolled in the study. The Subjective Global Assessment Classification technique was performed according to the procedure outlined by Detsky and colleagues. Residents were classified as well-nourished (A), mild/moderately undernourished (B) or severely undernourished (C). In addition, a Subjective Global Assessment Composite Score was derived. Subjective Global Assessment measures were compared with two traditional objective measurements of nutritional status: serum albumin and serum total cholesterol. Outcome measurements of nutrition-associated complications were determined over a 3-month period by recording the incidence of major infections, decubitus ulcers, nutrition-related hospital readmissions, and mortality. Results: Sixteen residents (30.2%) were categorized as Subjective Global Assessment class A, 28 residents (52.8%) were class B, and 9 residents (17%) were class C. A significant association was found between nutritional status as determined by Subjective Global Assessment Composite Score and nutrition-associated complications (p<0.05). Subjective Global Assessment Classification was related to death (p<0.05) with severely undernourished residents having the highest mortality rate. Hypoalbuminemia only demonstrated a significant relationship with nutrition-associated complications (p<0.05), whereas hypocholesterolemia was associated with death (p<0.05). Conclusions: Subjective Global Assessment of nutritional status appears to be a simple, noninvasive and cost-effective tool for assessing nutritional status of geriatric residents in long-term care facilities. This assessment tool is also beneficial for identifying patients with increased risk of nutrition-associated complications as well as death.

[1]  E. Lipkin,et al.  Assessment of nutritional status. The clinician's perspective. , 1993, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[2]  A. Detsky,et al.  Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements. , 1982, New England Journal of Medicine.

[3]  R. Uauy,et al.  Human protein requirements: nitrogen balance response to graded levels of egg protein in elderly men and women. , 1978, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  J. Hasse,et al.  Subjective global assessment: alternative nutrition-assessment technique for liver-transplant candidates. , 1993, Nutrition.

[5]  D. Sullivan Impact of Nutritional Status on Health Outcomes of Nursing Home Residents , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  R. Beyth,et al.  The Relationship Between Clinical Assessments of Nutritional Status and Adverse Outcomes in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  J. Morley,et al.  Nutritional Issues in Nursing Home Care , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  D. Sullivan Risk Factors for Early Hospital Readmission in a Select Population of Geriatric Rehabilitation Patients: The Significance of Nutritional Status , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  D. Rudman,et al.  Antecedents of Death in the Men of a Veterans Administration Nursing Home , 1987, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  P. Rojo,et al.  Subjective global assessment of nutritional status: further validation. , 1991, Nutrition.

[11]  A S Detsky,et al.  What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? , 1987, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[12]  D. Rudman,et al.  Prognostic significance of serum cholesterol in nursing home men. , 1988, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[13]  S. Sharma,et al.  Nutritional status of the elderly. , 1997, The Indian journal of medical research.

[14]  H. T. Reynolds,et al.  The analysis of cross-classifications , 1977 .

[15]  P J Garry,et al.  The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. , 1999, Nutrition.

[16]  C. Zoccali,et al.  Subjective global assessment of nutrition in dialysis patients. , 1993, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[17]  G. Blackburn,et al.  Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient. , 1977, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[18]  A. Detsky,et al.  Nutritional assessment. , 2000, Nutrition.

[19]  D Norton,et al.  Calculating the risk: reflections on the Norton Scale. , 1989, Decubitus.

[20]  A. Detsky,et al.  Predicting nutrition-associated complications for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. , 1987, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[21]  A. Detsky,et al.  A comparison of the predictive value of nutritional assessment techniques. , 1982, Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition.

[22]  Lipschitz Da Screening for nutritional status in the elderly. , 1994 .

[23]  N. Wellman The Nutrition Screening Initiative. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[24]  M. Unosson,et al.  Interrater variability and validity in subjective nutritional assessment of elderly patients. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.