Context and Interference Effects in the Combinations of Natural Concepts

The mathematical formalism of quantum theory exhibits significant effectiveness when applied to cognitive phenomena that have resisted traditional (set theoretical) modeling. Relying on a decade of research on the operational foundations of micro-physical and conceptual entities, we present a theoretical framework for the representation of concepts and their conjunctions and disjunctions that uses the quantum formalism. This framework provides a unified solution to the ‘conceptual combinations problem’ of cognitive psychology, explaining the observed deviations from classical (Boolean, fuzzy set and Kolmogorovian) structures in terms of genuine quantum effects. In particular, natural concepts ‘interfere’ when they combine to form more complex conceptual entities, and they also exhibit a ‘quantum-type context-dependence’, which are responsible of the ‘over- and under-extension’ that are systematically observed in experiments on membership judgments.

[1]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[2]  K. Sailer Quantum mechanics, 4th Ed. Alastair I.M. Rae , 2003 .

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  QUANTUM INTERFERENCE AND SUPERPOSITION IN COGNITION: A THEORY FOR THE DISJUNCTION OF CONCEPTS , 2011 .

[5]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure and human thought. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[6]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties , 2005 .

[7]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  New fundamental evidence of non-classical structure in the combination of natural concepts , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[11]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[12]  L. A. Zadeh,et al.  A note on prototype theory and fuzzy sets , 1982, Cognition.

[14]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[15]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[16]  E. Beltrametti,et al.  Bericht: On the Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1973 .

[17]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Beyond-Quantum Modeling of Question Order Effects and Response Replicability in Psychological Measurements , 2015, ArXiv.

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure of negation and conjunction in human thought , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[19]  J. Hampton,et al.  Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[20]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[21]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[22]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[23]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition , 2015, Front. Phys..

[24]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Physics: A General Realistic and Operational Approach , 2001, quant-ph/0105109.

[25]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Interference and Superposition in Cognition: Development of a Theory for the Disjunction of Concepts , 2007, 0705.0975.

[26]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[28]  Sam Alxatib,et al.  On the Psychology of Truth-Gaps , 2009, ViC.