On the accuracy and effectiveness of dose reconstruction for tomotherapy.

Dose reconstruction is a process that re-creates the treatment-time dose deposited in a patient provided there is knowledge of the delivered energy fluence and the patient's anatomy at the time of treatment. A method for reconstructing dose is presented. The process starts with delivery verification, in which the incident energy fluence from a treatment is computed using the exit detector signal and a transfer matrix to convert the detector signal to energy fluence. With the verified energy fluence and a CT image of the patient in the treatment position, the treatment-time dose distribution is computed using any model-based algorithm such as convolution/superposition or Monte Carlo. The accuracy of dose reconstruction and the ability of the process to reveal delivery errors are presented. Regarding accuracy, a reconstructed dose distribution was compared with a measured film distribution for a simulated breast treatment carried out on a thorax phantom. It was found that the reconstructed dose distribution agreed well with the dose distribution measured using film: the majority of the voxels were within the low and high dose-gradient tolerances of 3% and 3 mm respectively. Concerning delivery errors, it was found that errors associated with the accelerator, the multileaf collimator and patient positioning might be detected in the verified energy fluence and are readily apparent in the reconstructed dose. For the cases in which errors appear in the reconstructed dose, the possibility for adaptive radiotherapy is discussed.

[1]  Geoffrey S. Ibbott,et al.  Radiation Dosimetry: Electron Beams with Energies Between 1 and 50MeV (ICRU Report No. 35) , 1985 .

[2]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[3]  R E Hermes,et al.  Portal dose images. I: Quantitative treatment plan verification. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A Dutreix,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 2. Determination of the target absorbed dose. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  J W Wong,et al.  Portal dose images. II: Patient dose estimation. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  A dose distribution evaluation utilizing megavoltage CT imaging system. , 1990, Radiation medicine.

[7]  E. Van Der Schueren,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 1. Entrance dose measurements, a reliable procedure. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Mark P. Carol,et al.  3-D planning and delivery system for optimized conformal therapy , 1992 .

[9]  Conjecture on the use of high energy electrons for conformal radiotherapy , 1992 .

[10]  N. Blanckaert,et al.  Are port films reliable for in vivo exit dose measurements? , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Exit dose measurements by portal film dosimetry , 1993 .

[12]  J. Cygler,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.

[14]  M C Kirby,et al.  Measurement possibilities using an electronic portal imaging device. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  D. Huyskens,et al.  Midplane dose determination using in vivo dose measurements in combination with portal imaging. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  M C Schell,et al.  Input/output characteristics of a matrix ion-chamber electronic portal imaging device. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Portal dose measurement in radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Dosimetric characteristics of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  D A Jaffray,et al.  Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M C Kirby,et al.  The use of an electronic portal imaging device for exit dosimetry and quality control measurements. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Portal dosimetry using a liquid ion chamber matrix: dose response studies. , 1995, Medical physics.

[22]  R. Boellaard,et al.  The dose response relationship of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device. , 1996, Medical physics.

[23]  A R Bleier,et al.  The field-matching problem as it applies to the peacock three dimensional conformal system for intensity modulation. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  M. Carol,et al.  Initial clinical experience with the Peacock intensity modulation of a 3-D conformal radiation therapy system. , 1996, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[25]  M van Herk,et al.  Transmission dosimetry with a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  P M Evans,et al.  The application of transit dosimetry to precision radiotherapy. , 1996, Medical physics.

[27]  N Papanikolaou,et al.  Calculation of portal dose using the convolution/superposition method. , 1996, Medical physics.

[28]  B R Paliwal,et al.  Modeling dose distributions from portal dose images using the convolution/superposition method. , 1996, Medical physics.

[29]  S. Webb.  The Physics of Conformal Radiotherapy: Advances in Technology , 1997 .

[30]  M van Herk,et al.  Two-dimensional exit dosimetry using a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device and a convolution model. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  J O Deasy,et al.  An investigation of tomotherapy beam delivery. , 1997, Medical physics.

[32]  R. Boellaard,et al.  A convolution model to convert transmission dose images to exit dose distributions. , 1997, Medical physics.

[33]  B. Paliwal,et al.  Analysis and convergence of the iterative convolution/superposition dose reconstruction technique for multiple treatment beams and tomotherapy. , 1997, Medical physics.

[34]  S Mutic,et al.  Abutment region dosimetry for sequential arc IMRT delivery. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  A G Visser,et al.  Accurate portal dose measurement with a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for open and wedged beams and dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  M van Herk,et al.  New method to obtain the midplane dose using portal in vivo dosimetry. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  A G Visser,et al.  Portal dose image (PDI) prediction for dosimetric treatment verification in radiotherapy. I. An algorithm for open beams. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  M van Herk,et al.  First clinical tests using a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device and a convolution model for the verification of the midplane dose. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  T R Mackie,et al.  Maximum likelihood as a common computational framework in tomotherapy , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[41]  A G Visser,et al.  In vivo dosimetry for prostate cancer patients using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID); demonstration of internal organ motion. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[42]  M. Fix,et al.  Calibration of a portal imaging device for high-precision dosimetry: a Monte Carlo study. , 1998, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[43]  T R Mackie,et al.  Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  In vivo dosimetry during conformal radiotherapy: requirements for and findings of a routine procedure. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[45]  T R Mackie,et al.  Characterization of the output for helical delivery of intensity modulated slit beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[46]  T. Mackie,et al.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  C. Fiorino,et al.  In-vivo dosimetry by diode semiconductors in combination with portal films during TBI: reporting a 5-year clinical experience. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[48]  C. Langer,et al.  Concurrent chemoradiation using paclitaxel and carboplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[49]  T R Mackie,et al.  Registration using tomographic projection files. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  Gustavo H. Olivera,et al.  SIX PARAMETER PATIENT REGISTRATION DIRECTLY FROM PROJECTION DATA , 1999 .

[51]  A G Visser,et al.  Transit dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for 115 prostate cancer patients. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[52]  T. Mackie,et al.  Database Energy Fluence Verification and the Importance of On-Board CT Imaging in Dose Reconstruction , 2000 .

[53]  T. Mackie,et al.  Delivery Modification as an Alternative to Patient Repositioning in Tomotherapy , 2000 .

[54]  Kenneth J. Ruchala.  Megavoltage computed tomography for tomotherapeutic verification , 2000 .

[55]  J. Kapatoes,et al.  Megavoltage CT image reconstruction during tomotherapy treatments. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[56]  Variation of relative transit dose profiles with patient-detector distance. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[57]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[58]  D. Huyskens,et al.  A method to estimate the transit dose on the beam axis for verification of dose delivery with portal images. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[59]  T. Mackie,et al.  Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[60]  P J Reckwerdt,et al.  Megavoltage CT imaging as a by-product of multileaf collimator leakage. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[61]  Thomas R. Mackie,et al.  Tomographic Verification of Tomotherapy -- Before, During, and After Treatment , 2000 .

[62]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  A Generalization of Adaptive Radiotherapy and the Registration of Deformable Dose Distributions , 2000 .

[63]  T R Mackie,et al.  A feasible method for clinical delivery verification and dose reconstruction in tomotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.