Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index

The two Journal Citation Reports of the Science Citation Index 2004 and the Social Science Citation Index 2004 were combined in order to analyze and map journals and specialties at the edges and in the overlap between the two databases. For journals which belong to the overlap (e.g., Scientometrics), the merger mainly enriches our insight into the structure which can be obtained from the two databases separately; but in the case of scientific journals which are more marginal in either database, the combination can provide a new perspective on the position and function of these journals (e.g., Environment and Planning B — Planning and Design). The combined database additionally enables us to map citation environments in terms of the various specialties comprehensively. Using the vector-space model, visualizations are provided for specialties that are parts of the overlap (information science, science & technology studies). On the basis of the resulting visualizations, “betweenness” — a measure from social network analysis — is suggested as an indicator for measuring the interdisciplinarity of journals.

[1]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[2]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  The cognitive and the social structure of STS , 2001, Scientometrics.

[3]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[4]  Bethany S. Dohleman.  Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI , 2005, Scientometrics.

[6]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators , 2010, Scientometrics.

[8]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  The cognitive and the social structure of STS , 2001 .

[9]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Katy Börner,et al.  Mapping knowledge domains , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Environment and Planning B as a Journal: The interdisciplinarity of its environment and the citation impact , 2009, ArXiv.

[14]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies , 1989, Scientometrics.

[15]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[16]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design as a Journal: The Interdisciplinarity of its Environment and the Citation Impact , 2007 .

[18]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[19]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..