Fidelity metrics and the test-pedestal approach to spatial vision

This paper has three parts. Part 1 contains musings on the title of this conference, 'Computational Vision Based on Neurobiology.' Progress has been slow in computational vision because very difficult problems are being tackled before the simpler problems have been solved. Part 2 is about one of these simpler problems in computational vision that is largely neglected by computational vision researchers: the development of a fidelity metric. This is an enterprise perfectly suited for computational vision with the side benefit of having spectacular practical implications. Part 3 discusses the research my colleagues and I have been pursuing for the past several years on the Test-Pedestal approach to spatial vision. This approach can be helpful as a guide for the development of a fidelity metric. A number of experiments using this approach are discussed. These examples demonstrate both the power and the pitfalls of the Test-Pedestal approach.

[1]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The role of separation and eccentricity in encoding position , 1990, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[4]  S. Klein,et al.  Evidence against narrow-band spatial frequency channels in human vision: the detectability of frequency modulated gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[5]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  The role of local contrast in the visual deficits of humans with naturally occurring amblyopia , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Thom Carney,et al.  Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination? , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  S A Klein,et al.  Double-judgment psychophysics: problems and solutions. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  lan Tattersall,et al.  Treatise on man , 1993, Nature.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Opponent-movement mechanisms in human vision. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  Stanley A. Klein Spatial vision models: problems and successes , 1994 .

[17]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Visual detection and discrimination of luminance increments. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  D M Levi,et al.  Peripheral hyperacuity: isoeccentric bisection is better than radial bisection. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[21]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Visual Multipoles And The Assessment Of Visual Sensitivity To Displayed Images , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[22]  S. Klein,et al.  Position sense of the peripheral retina. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  Thom Carney,et al.  Vernier acuity as line and dipole detection , 1990, Vision Research.