Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography

Nuclear pore complexes reside in the nuclear envelope of eukaryotic cells and mediate the nucleocytoplasmic exchange of macromolecules. Traffic is regulated by mobile transport receptors that target their cargo to the central translocation channel, where phenylalanine-glycine-rich repeats serve as binding sites. The structural analysis of the nuclear pore is a formidable challenge given its size, its location in a membranous environment and its dynamic nature. Here we have used cryo-electron tomography to study the structure of nuclear pore complexes in their functional environment, that is, in intact nuclei of Dictyostelium discoideum. A new image-processing strategy compensating for deviations of the asymmetric units (protomers) from a perfect eight-fold symmetry enabled us to refine the structure and to identify new features. Furthermore, the superposition of a large number of tomograms taken in the presence of cargo, which was rendered visible by gold nanoparticles, has yielded a map outlining the trajectories of import cargo. Finally, we have performed single-molecule Monte Carlo simulations of nuclear import to interpret the experimentally observed cargo distribution in the light of existing models for nuclear import.

[1]  C. Akey,et al.  Active nuclear pore complexes in Chironomus: visualization of transporter configurations related to mRNP export. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[2]  R. Milligan,et al.  Nuclear pore complexes exceeding eightfold rotational symmetry. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[3]  U. Aebi,et al.  Sequential Binding of Import Ligands to Distinct Nucleopore Regions During Their Nuclear Import , 1996, Science.

[4]  W. O. Saxton,et al.  The correlation averaging of a regularly arranged bacterial cell envelope protein , 1982, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  G. Riddick,et al.  A systems analysis of importin-α–β mediated nuclear protein import , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  G. Blobel,et al.  Karyopherin-mediated import of integral inner nuclear membrane proteins , 2006, Nature.

[7]  G. Blobel,et al.  A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  Dirk Görlich,et al.  Characterization of Ran‐driven cargo transport and the RanGTPase system by kinetic measurements and computer simulation , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[9]  G. Blobel,et al.  Structure of Nup58/45 Suggests Flexible Nuclear Pore Diameter by Intermolecular Sliding , 2007, Science.

[10]  L. Gerace,et al.  Gradient of Increasing Affinity of Importin β for Nucleoporins along the Pathway of Nuclear Import , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Maryann E Martone,et al.  Evidence for Ectopic Neurotransmission at a Neuronal Synapse , 2005, Science.

[12]  M Lugg,et al.  The hole picture , 2009 .

[13]  I. Mattaj,et al.  Quantitative models of nuclear transport. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Ralf P. Richter,et al.  FG-Rich Repeats of Nuclear Pore Proteins Form a Three-Dimensional Meshwork with Hydrogel-Like Properties , 2006, Science.

[16]  C. Akey Structural plasticity of the nuclear pore complex. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  G. Drin,et al.  A general amphipathic α-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of the route of protein import: the role of nuclear pore complex substructures. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[19]  G. Drin,et al.  A general amphipathic alpha-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature. , 2007, Nature structural & molecular biology.

[20]  M. Stewart,et al.  Nup50/Npap60 function in nuclear protein import complex disassembly and importin recycling , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[21]  L. Loew,et al.  Systems Analysis of Ran Transport , 2002, Science.

[22]  M. Rexach,et al.  Natively Unfolded Nucleoporins Gate Protein Diffusion across the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Cell.

[23]  F. Förster,et al.  Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Dynamics Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2004, Science.

[24]  B. Chait,et al.  Components of Coated Vesicles and Nuclear Pore Complexes Share a Common Molecular Architecture , 2004, PLoS biology.

[25]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[26]  M. Fornerod,et al.  The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  G. Blobel,et al.  Nup358, a Cytoplasmically Exposed Nucleoporin with Peptide Repeats, Ran-GTP Binding Sites, Zinc Fingers, a Cyclophilin A Homologous Domain, and a Leucine-rich Region (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  From lattice distortion to molecular distortion : characterising and exploiting crystal deformation , 1992 .

[29]  J. Gelles,et al.  Imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  V. Lučić,et al.  Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[31]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  U. Aebi,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: a jack of all trades? , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.