Work-to-rule: the emergence of algorithmic governance in Wikipedia

Research has shown the importance of a functioning governance system for the success of peer production communities. It particularly highlights the role of human coordination and communication within the governance regime. In this article, we extend this line of research by differentiating two categories of governance mechanisms. The first category is based primarily on communication, in which social norms emerge that are often formalized by written rules and guidelines. The second category refers to the technical infrastructure that enables users to access artifacts, and that allows the community to communicate and coordinate their collective actions to create those artifacts. We collected qualitative and quantitative data from Wikipedia in order to show how a community's consensus gradually converts social mechanisms into algorithmic mechanisms. In detail, we analyze algorithmic governance mechanisms in two embedded cases: the software extension "flagged revisions" and the bot "xqbot". Our insights point towards a growing relevance of algorithmic governance in the realm of governing large-scale peer production communities. This extends previous research, in which algorithmic governance is almost absent. Further research is needed to unfold, understand, and also modify existing interdependencies between social and algorithmic governance mechanisms.

[1]  Ray Bert,et al.  Automate This: How Algorithms Came To Rule Our World By Christopher Steiner. New York City: Portfolio/Penguin, 2012 , 2012 .

[2]  M. Markus The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? , 2007 .

[3]  Christopher Steiner,et al.  Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World , 2012 .

[4]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[5]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  An empirical study of software developers' management of dependencies and changes , 2008, 2008 ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[6]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia , 2009, GROUP.

[7]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[8]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia , 2008, CHI.

[9]  Paul B. de Laat,et al.  Governance of open source software: state of the art , 2007 .

[10]  José van Dijck,et al.  Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system , 2010, New Media Soc..

[11]  M. Tushman Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[12]  E. Morrison,et al.  Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. , 1993 .

[13]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens , 2021, ICWSM.

[14]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  The singularity is not near: slowing growth of Wikipedia , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[15]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Herding the cats: the influence of groups in coordinating peer production , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[16]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[17]  R. Stuart Geiger,et al.  The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal , 2010, CSCW '10.

[18]  Mark Cenite Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 2000 .

[19]  Rebecca E. Grinter Recomposition: Coordinating a Web of Software Dependencies , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  The Hidden Order of Wikipedia , 2007, HCI.

[21]  R. Stuart Geiger The social roles of bots and assisted editing programs , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[22]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Bots and Cyborgs: Wikipedia's Immune System , 2012, Computer.

[23]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[24]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Governance in Open Source Software Development Projects: A Comparative Multi-level Analysis , 2010, OSS.

[25]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Governance of open content creation: A conceptualization and analysis of control and guiding mechanisms in the open content domain , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Jonathan T. Morgan,et al.  The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System , 2013 .

[27]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Mopping up: modeling wikipedia promotion decisions , 2008, CSCW.

[28]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[29]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[30]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[31]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.