A Lane Assessment Method Using Visual Information Based on a Dynamic Bayesian Network

The perception and the interpretation of the vehicle's surrounding are the core modules in any advanced driving assistance system, and the first two stages of every autonomous driving solution. The purpose of the perception stage is to assess the state of the relevant objects (objects’ positions, shape, class, orientation, speed) using the primary sensorial information. The purpose of the interpretation stage is to use the objects assessment in order to achieve situation assessment, that is, identification of the instantaneous relations between the traffic environment elements as well as their evolution in time. The work presented in this article lies within the interpretation layer; our aim is to identify on which of the road's lanes is the ego-vehicle currently traveling. We refer to the own vehicle as the ego-vehicle and to its current driving lane as the ego-lane. The ego-vehicle is equipped with a stereovision perception system, and the proposed solution is to identify the ego-lane number by matching the visually detected lane landmarks with the corresponding map landmarks, available from an original extended digital map. Additionally, the visually detected vehicles are used for ego-lane number identification. The proposed solution is a probabilistic one, in the form of a Bayesian network, which uses as evidence the visual cues provided by the stereovision perception system. In order to incorporate the dynamic nature of the problem, a temporal dimension was added to the network, resulting in a dynamic Bayesian model. Experimental results illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method in complex situations, and the improved efficiency of the dynamic approach over the static one.

[1]  Jürgen Valldorf,et al.  Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2009 , 2009 .

[2]  Wilfried Enkelmann,et al.  A video-based lane keeping assistant , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8511).

[3]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Curb Detection Based on a Multi-Frame Persistence Map for Urban Driving Scenarios , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[5]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Progress with situation assessment and risk prediction in advanced driver assistance systems: A survey , 2009 .

[6]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Stereovision-Based Sensor for Intersection Assistance , 2009 .

[7]  Thanh-Son Dao,et al.  Markov-Based Lane Positioning Using Intervehicle Communication , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  K. Weiss,et al.  Environmental perception and situation assessment for an advanced highway assistant , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[9]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning , 2002 .

[10]  Gerd Wanielik,et al.  Situation Assessment for Automatic Lane-Change Maneuvers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Vojkan Mihajlovic,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian Networks: A State of the Art , 2001 .

[12]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Lane identification and ego-vehicle accurate global positioning in intersections , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[13]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Automatic Symbolic Traffic Scene Analysis Using Belief Networks , 1994, AAAI.

[14]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  The BATmobile: Towards a Bayesian Automated Taxi , 1995, IJCAI.

[15]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Probabilistic Approach for Automated Reasoning for Lane Identification in Intelligent Vehicles , 2011, 2011 13th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing.

[16]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Revisions to the JDL data fusion model , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Kyoung-Ho Choi,et al.  Methods to Detect Road Features for Video-Based In-Vehicle Navigation Systems , 2010, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[19]  David Bernstein,et al.  Some map matching algorithms for personal navigation assistants , 2000 .

[20]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Detection and classification of painted road objects for intersection assistance applications , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Olaf Stursberg,et al.  Safety assessment of driving behavior in multi-lane traffic for autonomous vehicles , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[22]  Maan El Badaoui El Najjar,et al.  A Road Matching Method for Precise Vehicle Localization Using Hybrid Bayesian Network , 2008, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[23]  Michael Brost,et al.  Action Recognition and Prediction for Driver Assistance Systems Using Dynamic Belief Networks , 2002, Agent Technologies, Infrastructures, Tools, and Applications for E-Services.

[24]  Paulo E. Santos,et al.  Probabilistic Logic Reasoning about Traffic Scenes , 2011, TAROS.

[25]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Situation assessment algorithm for a collision prevention assistant , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[26]  Mark Witkowski,et al.  Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems: 12th Annual Conference, TAROS 2011, Sheffield, UK, August 31 -- September 2, 2011, Proceedings , 2011 .